PBL:
Toxic Wastes at Former US Military Bases in the Philippines
|
|
Home
| Learner Notes | Facilitator
Notes | Glossary | Resources
| Email | WebCt | Concept
Map Constructions | Site Map
|
|
|
Prototype
After nearly a century of military operations in the Philippines, the US military left behind sites contaminated with toxic solvents, pesticides, asbestos, heavy metals, unexploded ordnance and other hazardous substances. Serious groundwater and soil contamination in over 46 sites on Clark and Subic is documented in reports by the US General Accounting Office (GAO), World Health Organization, Independent US and Philippine experts, two US-based environmental firms, and the Department of Defense's internal reports. US failure to meet its environmental safety standards is also documented by the GAO. Yet, US officials refuse to even acknowledge the problem.
It is unconscionable that the US, with full knowledge of the danger of military contamination and while willing to protect those in developed countries, is unwilling to help the Philippines, a country with few financial and technical resources to conduct a comprehensive cleanup. This US refusal to protect health violates international law. Filipino Americans can rectify this environmental injustice by pressuring the US government to meet its moral and legal obligations to protect health. When the U.S. military closed down its bases in the Philippines in 1992, they left behind toxic contamination that is now seeping into the environment, threatening the lives of thousands of people in surrounding communities. Today, more than one hundred people have died from illnesses believed to be linked to the toxic waste. Despite calls by community and environmental groups for U.S. accountability, the United States refuses to take responsibility for this environmental tragedy. Who is going to clean up the toxic wastes left at the former military bases in the Philippines, how is it going to be cleaned up, and how is the environmental health of the people in these affected communities in and surrounding the former bases going to be protected? |
Last Updated on Tuesday, May 14, 2002