<Back to Main NCLC 120 Page>

NCLC-120 Extra Credit Opportunity (Optional)

LLOG 6: The Making and Evolution of Complexity

Synopsis Prompt Questions for LLOG 6:

1)     1. How does evolutionary theory explain the development of human eyes?  (Start with a two-cell eye, and include an explanation of the role of the Pax-6 gene.)

In a two-cell eye, there are photoreceptor and pigment cells. This is the most basic form of an eye. Today, you can find this type of an eye in larvae of ragworms. This type of an eye would typically be cup-shaped. The job of the most basic form of an eye is to detect light. The Pax-6 gene is a tool-kit protein, which means that it helps with building cell types. In this case, the Pax-6 gene is building the parts of the eye, such as the surrounding tissue. In a two-cell eye, the eye is shaped like a cup. As time went on, the eye evolved into a more complex cone shape because a constricted opening for a light source created better vision. The next part that evolved onto the eye was the lens, which helps create a sharper image. Now, there are three main types of eyes called camera, mirror, and compound eyes. Arthropods have more rhabdomeric eyes, while we humans have a ciliary eye. The main difference is that in a ciliary eye, there is more membrane surface area and the receptor area has the image of a bunch of stacked discs.

2. You may hear that the eye is too complex to have formed by natural selection:  “Evolution theory says the eye must have formed as a single mutation, or it won't function.  Without a fully-working eye, there would be no selective advantage.  Creatures with less than a 100% functioning eye would not pass their genetic mutation to their offspring.”  How would an evolutionary biologist such as Carroll respond?


Carroll would respond with this answer: The eye developed based on what was beneficial to the certain species. In a certain species, the eye started out cup-shaped. However, within those genes, there are switches which control the modification of tool-kit genes. The cause of the differences in eyes is because of these switches. That is why the development of the eye can relate to the development of differences in fruit fly wings in a certain way. Also, because there is a modification in the certain tool-kit gene, mainly the Pax6 gene, this means that certain changes may have occurred to help build the eye when certain switches were not on. However, the switches are meant to be separate so that it does not affect the modification of other tool-kit genes throughout the body. All of these characteristics kept being passed on, which is why the eye developed the way that it did. This also developed through the findings of Evo Devo. 

3)     3. What are tool-kit proteins?  How are they different from proteins such as hemoglobin?

Tool-kit proteins are the proteins that help with the building of cellular blocks which are part of a bigger structure. Tool-kit proteins build a structure, but certain proteins carry out other processes. Certain proteins such as hemoglobin transfer certain messages or necessary items like oxygen. Tool-kit proteins also have the ability to build full organs with their full structures. Unfortunately, other types of proteins can also carry diseases like sickle-cell anemia. Overall, tool-kit proteins control every characteristic of certain cell types through the body. Other proteins serve the purpose of assisting in immune response and cell signaling. It all depends on what the body needs. Tool-kit proteins just happen to be the proteins that assist in building organs because that is something that the body needs. If the body needed something else, a different protein would be formed to relay that message to other specified parts of the body.

      Most Challenging Concepts

            If the evolution of the eye, as Carroll explained, just kept improving the shape of the eye as time went on, why do so many people in the world have eyesight problems? There are more people going blind from certain causes, and there are many people that wear glasses. Shouldn’t every human being have really good eyesight? If the making of the eye has lasted for so many years, shouldn’t the code for a perfect eye keep being passed on through reproduction instead of so many people having eye problems?

Seminar Questions
1.  As Carroll has mentioned that there are genetic switches, what would happen if all of the genetic switches turned off at the same time? Would the function that they were controlling just stop?
2. If there has been this many years with the formation of eyes improving continuously, will there ever be a species to be considered to have the perfect eye? If this starts happening, is there anything that will affect this process?

Connections
    
    Compound eyes versus two-cell eyes can relate to group interaction versus individual work. With one photoreceptor, the eye can still function. However, with multiple photo receptors, there are multiple viewpoints that only have slight differences, which can be beneficial to seeing more objects at a time. This can relate to group interaction and individual work because when there are more people completing the one task together, they can get the task done faster than the individual person.
Both types of eyes serve the same purpose, but just get the job done differently. This is the same with group versus individual work because each way will get a specific task done, but the approach to getting that task done will be different.

Vocabulary

1. Epithelial: membranous tissue composed of one or more layers of cells separated by very little intercellular substance and forming the covering of most internal and external surfaces of the body and its organs
2. Contrivance: any improvised arrangement for temporary use; a device or control that is very useful for a particular job
3. Ganglion: a mass of nerve tissue existing outside the central nervous system
        *Definitions from www.dictionary.com*

<Back to Main NCLC 120 Page>