In the research of “AI ethical decision making: Is society ready?” It raised several moral concerns regarding data security, bias, and policies.
When asked about their view on the subject, there is a social apprehension about AI’s ability to make moral judgments, however, the source of this fear isn’t necessarily rooted in individuals.
The study suggests that this rejection of AI comes from what individuals perceive and what society thinks. There are several moral concerns about data security, bias, and policies. Anyone can find themselves online, and privacy is nearly impossible, especially if they use social media, and this can result in nasty behavior.
Since we managed to survive a pandemic that heavily relied on technology to function, I believe our underlying social structures and the way we think about how people should be provided with resources to live should require significant policy adjustments.
According to the article “AI and Human Rights: A Critical Ethico-Legal Overview” AI. in general, has been a double-edged sword because of its potential to uphold human rights and severely violate them.
These issues include deep fakes, unemployment, restrictions on free movement, bias, and discrimination. However, in circumstances where there is a greater public interest, it might be tolerated in professions like law and medicine where there is a shortage of skilled employees. It appears that coming forward, AI-generative tools will most likely continue to be more widely used in a variety of applications rather than being constrained.
