Yet the more nefarious side of deepfakes has emerged. Kietzmann and Pitt (2020) cite real life events of synthetic voices used for fraudulent financial gain, such as a situation in 2021 when a UK energy company pleaded with their banks about a wire scam worth hundreds of thousands because someone had their CEO's voice on the line. Chesney and Citron (2019) expand this concern into the realm of the “liar’s dividend” whereby the existence of deepfakes renders any video or audio untrustworthy. This assessment against the counterfeit world operates to give a two-for-one punch to bad actors: first, they can create fabricated evidence without repercussion; second, when genuine recordings exist against a guilty party, they can easily denounce it as fake. The liar's dividend is one of the largest concerns facing criminal trials today. While individual fraud is one concern, a concern for society and a wider scale of media rendition exists