Eyewitness identification has always relied on facial composite images to begin the investigating process for law enforcement. When a witness is unsure who the suspect is, the witness is asked to participate in a multistep process of constructing a facial image through memory that resembles the offender. This process includes describing the facial features and selecting specific aspects of the face to produce a constructed version of the offender to make a facial composite. Law enforcement agencies typically relied on forensic/ sketch artists in the past but this technique is now being replaced by computerized systems that are controlled by a police officer (McQuiston-Surrett, Topp & Malpass, 2006). Computerized facial composite systems allow the identification process to be conducted in an easy, more efficient manner which increases the chances of a precise facial composite. However, there are many factors that contribute to the accuracy of facial composites developed by a witness that need to be addressed before relying heavily on the new development in technology.