Mimi Corcoran
   George Mason University
   Educational Leadership Ph.D. Portfolio
   Primary Concentration:  Mathematics
   Secondary Concentration: Instructional Technology
       
 Mixed Methods Research

Self-development is a higher duty than self-sacrifice.

Elizabeth Cady Stanton


There is nothing like returning to a place that remains unchanged to find the ways in which you yourself have altered.

Nelson Mandela

        As I walked along Mason Pond this summer, I thought about the many times I had walked past it previously.  The first semester had been snowy and icy.  Other times had been in the heat of the summer; sometimes I was rushing with a backpack full of materials.  And, many times, I had walked that path with a classmate after class while we talked about research and teaching and how we were progressing.  I got a little nostalgic for how my education and experiences have affected me and how my understanding has widened and deepened.

        My program required courses in introductory qualitative and quantitative research.  I was very curious about both.  I wanted to do research but had no idea how to go about it.  I enrolled in Dr. Maxwell's qualitative course for a summer semester.  Not only did I know painfully little about qualitative research, I had no idea that there were so many different types.  I had a hard time keeping them straight.  I never dismissed qualitative research as anything less than valuable; but, I did gain a great appreciation for it during this class.  I began reading dissertations and found that several of them had a chapter on the quantitative research, including some calculations, and a huge chapter on the qualitative research, complete with tables, charts, anecdotal information and transcripts.  So, I surmised that this was Mixed Methods.

        Wrong again.  There is so much more to mixed methods.  My EDRS 797 Mixed Methods course was intense and filled with voluminous reading assignments; I know that we just touched the surface.  The biggest revelation for me was that mixed methods truly does mean that the methods are intertwined, they inform each other and can clarify each other.  We read several articles from which one conclusion could have reasonably arisen.  However, when methods were "mixed" a completely different picture arose.  So, mixed methods is much more than "quantitative part + qualitative part = mixed methods."   I think of it almost as flour and water, or two crayon colors, both are fine are their own, but together they can be more than the sum of their parts.  

        I view this course as one of the best in my program.  I like the idea of having quantitative data clarify some reasons for qualitative findings and qualitative data shed light on why some of the numbers look the way they do.  It seems to me that this is a more thorough way of conducting research.  I have also found that some authors fail to take advantage of using different data sets to shed light on other data and clarify their findings.  I find it disappointing when such a great opportunity is missed.  I know it takes time; but, it is well worth it.

        In the summer institutes, we administered pre-tests and post-tests.  And, throughout the weeks, we listened to their classroom discussions, read their reflections and reviewed their homework.  None of these is viewed in isolation.  We talk about how one factor may be affected by another.  We even discuss students’ dispositions if anything may be a consideration.  For example, last year a student was taking our class two weeks before her wedding; and, this year, a student was hostile over the level of material being presented.  So, I think I have had some very good practical experience in mixed methods.  I have a very long way to go; but, I am on the path.