NCLC 110
In NCLC 110, reflective thinking made up most of the class. Throughout the class, we were assigned various readings from and The Arlington Reader and The Norton's Field Guide. Most
of our assignments consisted of developing a summary of the author's
arguments, analyzing a specific part of a reading, or developing our
own opinion of the reading. Both in and out of class, we were expected
to explore our mind, and see if there were any reflections we were able
to make about a specific part of one of the readings. Some of the types
of essays that were required assignments were analytical essays,
argumentative essays, reflection essays, and compare and contrasting
essays. Even though an essay might have been called a reflective essay,
every type of essay written in the class had to do with reflecting on a
specific topic. Another part that dealt with reflective thinking was
group work. For example, we went to hemlock and were separated into
groups. From there, we were completing all types of tasks and
activities as a group. If we did not accomplish a task at first, we had
to stop and reflect on how the group could improve the next time
around. For the Higher Education Project, we were given a specific
topic that was affecting higher education. As a task for the project,
we had to develop a reason as to why this topic was affecting higher
education. The reflective thinking part of it was analyzing the
problems of the topic, and then being able to come up with solutions
that would fix the problems. Overall, reflective thinking was a vital
aspect of this course. At the start of the course, it was essential
that we came into the class with an open mind. |
NCLC 130
In
NCLC 130, critical thinking was an important part of the class. Over
the course of the six weeks, we explored many different concepts and
ideologies dealing with The Social World. Everything
that we worked on in class was solely based off of facts. In other
words, work that was done for the class explored information that has
already been discovered and proven to be true. Within NCLC 130, we had
assignments that dealt with interpreting the past, present, and future
of historical information and statistics. Some of the assignment topics
were migration, globalization, and imperialism. For example, the
Discovery Project was about a specific migration group that related to
our discovery subject person. Within the project, we looked up
statistics of how many immigrants were on certain ships, how many
people settled in the different areas throughout the United States, and
much more. Then we researched why the immigrants came to the United
States, and what life was like once they arrived in the country.
Finally, all of our research was put into essays over the course of the
six weeks. Another example can be the Integrative Group project. This
required the class groups to come up with a presentation dealing with
migration. It was a broad topic because the professors wanted us to be
able to realize that there are many situations in history that deal
with migration. We had to create a museum exhibit, which explained our
specific topic about migration. Overall, NCLC 130 was a course based on
facts and our ability to interpret those facts. Throughout the course,
we dealt with ourselves in a broader picture of reality. |