Professional
Development Needs
Circle your level of need for each of the following categories.
Key: 1 – Not needed nor
necessary
2 – Very little need
3 - A need but not of the utmost
importance.
4 - Would like more information and
training. Important.
5 - Would like more information and
training. Most Important
Topic |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
How to use
technology |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Implementation of
technology in lessons |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Basics of
collaboration with peers |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Vocabulary in my
content |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Methods of
differentiation |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
How to implement
differentiation methodologies into my daily lessons |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Writing varied
levels of questions |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Making connections
between the concepts and to real-life situations |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Vertical aligning
curriculum |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Problem based
teaching and learning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
How to use data to
guide differentiation to meet student needs on a daily basis |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
How to use
benchmark data to guide differentiation to meet student needs for remediation |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Making Connections
Between Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction:
Professional
Development Proposal
High School: SOL assessed
courses
Teachers will:
·
Analyze
their learning style and discover their multiple intelligences acknowledging
how it affects their teaching style and relationships with their students.
·
Learn to
write higher level questions.
·
Review
types of lesson plans for investigative lessons and direct instruction.
·
Discuss
classroom management techniques that aid and support student-centered learning
and teaching.
·
Learn
the “How to’s” of providing differentiation within
their classrooms.
·
Discuss
the role of technology in meeting the needs of all students and its’ correct
usage.
·
Analyze
the first and second quarter data to determine weak areas in the curriculum and
their teaching.
·
Be split
into groups according to courses and schools.
·
Create a
unit of study based on a first or second quarter weakness
that are student-centered and relevant to the students’ lives.
·
Present
one of the lessons created during the summer during the assigned first/second
quarter and report back during the follow up sessions.
·
Follow
up reports are to include a reflection about how the lesson proceeded,
a sample of an assessment completed by a student (name omitted), discussion of
what the assessment is telling the teacher and the subsequent remediation,
connections between concepts that the teacher and students made during the
lesson, any changes, additions or deletions.
·
15 hours
during the summer, 1 hour on SCORE for the groups to finalize the unit, and 2 –
2 hour follow up sessions.
·
Book:
The written unit should include:
·
an
overview of the unit,
·
a list
of standards addressed in the unit,
·
key
concepts and/or generalizations to be used to focus the teacher and student,
·
what
students will be expected to know, understand, and be able to do as a result of
the unit, (showing) connections between concepts on the curriculum maps and
previous course concepts,
·
key
instructional strategies,
·
supporting
materials and equipment,
·
unit
overview chart (3 columns) includes 1) lesson sequence and the expected time
allotment, 2) whole class activities, and 3) differentiated components to meet
the needs of all students,
·
unit description
(lesson sequence and description, how they plan to gear up or gear down each
lesson, formative and summative assessments), and teacher commentary (thoughts
about the component and higher order questions). Differentiated components should be “starred”
and all supporting documents and assessment included at the end of the unit.
·
Reflection
(this is to be turned in separately after a lesson has been taught.)
Description posted on My Learning Plan:
This course is open to all
high school mathematics teachers. Teachers will have the opportunity to
recognize their teaching style strengths/weaknesses, look at varied questioning
levels, develop assessments, and investigate vertical alignment with respect to
the course you are teaching. Making connections in the content and exploring
how to differentiate, the how to’s, will be
discussed. Two follow up sessions will take place during the school year and
one online SCORE discussion.
Process used to determine professional development
needs:
Spotsylvania
County Schools require teachers to attend 20 hours of professional development
on the division level each year along with 18 hours of site based professional
development. It is a huge undertaking to decide the needs of teachers
county-wide. Professional development is attempting to gather data as to the
usefulness and success of the division wide professional development courses.
Thus a process has been implemented this year that guides how we go through
making these decisions. I have the freedom to determine what is offered but
need to submit a proposal, along with data to support the need for the course,
to the professional development department. A committee then approves,
disapproves, or amends our suggestions. After we are approved, I write a
proposal along with a course description that will be placed on My Learning
Plan for the teachers to view and sign up.
In order to make the best informed
decision possible I decided to go out to the teachers and administrators. Students
in our county take quarterly benchmark assessments. After the assessment is
given and the data gathered, I visit each of the secondary schools to discuss
concerns regarding the assessment, the curriculum for the past and current quarter, and how to use the data to remediate students as an
intervention to the end of course state assessments. After the second quarter
benchmark assessment I also used this time to determine professional
development needs. The questions on the survey (attached) are those that are
asked of teachers and administrator overseeing mathematics in each secondary
level building. I summarized the needs and requests for each school and then by
county. These needs, requests, are then correlated with data collected from the
benchmarks and Standards of Learning end of course assessment data.
Administrator concerns are heavily weighted in our decision of what will be
presented. The data and course request was submitted resulting in the
development of the attached proposal and course description.