Meeting notes from Feb. 7,
2001 - JMU T/TAC
· Most training occurs off site
· Trainers take handouts to their workshops
· They do not perceive themselves as reactive. The old organization (TAC) was primarily reactive, but with the addition of training in their curriculum, they have begun to be pro-active in designing training based on needs of the prior year.
· What they train on is also dictated by the DOE.
· Follow-up: usually ask for a direct follow-up survey 3 - 4 weeks after the completion of training. Would like to see an area on the site that would allow teachers to access the survey online and e-mail it to the specific trainer they dealt with.
· Mostly utilize T/TAC resources when needed, but also search the web for additional resources.
· Subjects of resources are not specific to the individual T/TAC's - they may share among each other and other T/TACs and adapt them to their specific needs.
· They have no specific procedures for sharing materials, but the did express that they would like the opportunity to share among T/TACs to be more readily available.
· In relation to sharing materials, someone suggested having a private room within T/TAC Online where only coordinators were allowed to discuss training issues and share materials and receive input on new materials.
· Phone and e-mail are their primary methods of communication
· Always refer parents back to their child's teacher - would like to see the dyad
· Avoid one-on-one contact with parents outside the school setting where teachers are present
· The state mandates that parents have access to all T/TAC materials and workshops on all subjects except AT
· Parents should feel free to access the site and gather info. and talk to professionals/experts, but the site should not "allow" parental socialization - not necessary and goes against T/TAC's policies regarding parents
· Potential problems with parents? T/TAC doesn't want to be the middle man - don't want the parents to be prescriptive
· T/TAC newsletters are the main form of knowledge distribution and marketing
· JMU T/TAC mails the newsletters to individuals (not group mailings)
· Currently engage in a LISTSERVE - not many participants - see the same people responding all of the time
· View T/TAC Online as being a duplicate effort for a while after it is initiated - will never be a replacement for face-to-face training.
· Teachers and trainers are comfortable in face-to-face environments - might have trouble adjusting to online environment
· Computer literacy is mixed in their region - the technology is not available to support complex sites
What they would like to see
included in the site (brainstorming)
·
Anonymity
for teachers - comfortable atmosphere
·
area
to share / vent
·
structured
- regulated - monitored ...possible levels of access?
·
designated
roles identified online in some way (graphics, codes, color) so that the users
can see when they are talking to an expert or a parent or a service provider
·
Quick
search within the site by topic (learning objects) using key words - universal
T/TAC list????
·
FREE
stuff for teachers!!!!! or links to free stuff
·
Someplace
for new teachers to meet with experienced teachers...exchange of
ideas....support
·
Examples
of...Alternate Assessment, SOL's, etc.
·
video
streaming of actual teachers in practice - maybe played at a certain time that
is pre-designated
·
highlight
exemplary or model teachers....low-tech of the week
·
surveys
and polls to determine the topics that teachers are most interested in - to be
tracked and sent to DOE
·
A
way to track / determine the length of time a user was on the site and how active
they were (points given for extensive use)
·
Needs
to be reliable, relevant, current, quick, easily accessed, customizable (by
topics for portfolio/profile), usable, translatable
·
It
must also offer a sense of ownership among members, reward the users for coming
to the site
_____________________________________________________________________________
Features
need by coordinators:
Coordinator job needs:
Coordinator concerns: