References

Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers’ views of the nature of science. Science Education, 10, 101-143.

Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Akerson, V. L. (2006, April). Metacognitive strategies on pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.

Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L. & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 36, 404-420.

Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1057- 1095.

Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of research in Science Teaching. 37, 295-317.

Akerson, V. L. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth-grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1025-1049.

Akerson, V. L., Flick, L. B. & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of primary children’s ideas in science on teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 37, 363-385.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Bartholomew, H. & Osborne, J. (2004). Teaching students “ideas-about-science”: Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 36, 655-682.

Beeth, M. E. (1998). Teaching for conceptual change: Using status as a metacognitive tool. Science Education, 23, 738 – 759.

Beeth, M. E. & Hewson, P. W. (1999). Learning goals in an exemplary science teacher’s practice: Cognitive and social factors in teaching for conceptual change. Science Education, 60, 738-823.

Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 563-581.

Bell, R. L. & Lederman, N. G. (2000, April). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.

Bianchini, J. A. & Colburn, A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 177-209.

Blank, L. M. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding? Science Education, 84, 486-506.

Briscoe, C. (1991). The dynamic interactions among beliefs, role metaphors, and teaching practices: A case study of teacher change. Science Education, 75, 185-199.

Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Bybee, R. W. (2004). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L.B. Flick and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science (pp. 1-14). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Clough, M. P. (1997). Strategies and activities for initiating and maintaining pressure of students’ naïve views concerning the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 191-204.

Chin, C. & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 109-138.

Cobern, W. W., Gibson, A. T. & Underwood, S. A. (1999). Conceptualizations of nature: An interpretive study of 16 ninth graders’ everyday thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 541-564.

Corno, L. & Mandinach, E. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88-108.

Costa, J., Calderia, H., Gallastegui, J. R. & Otero, J. (2000). An analysis of question asking on scientific texts explaining natural phenomona. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 37, 602-614.

Crawford, T. (2005). What counts as knowing: Constructing a communicative repertoire for student demonstration of knowledge in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 139-165.

Crawford, T., Kelly, G. J. & Brown, C. (2000). Ways of knowing beyond facts and laws of science: An ethnographic investigation of student engagement in scientific practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 237-258.

Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Science, 12(1), 91-142.

Dawson, R. E. (2000). Critical thinking, scientific thinking, and everyday thinking: Metacognition about cognition. Academic Exchange Quarterly.

Deboer, G. E. (2004). Historical perspectives on inquiry teaching in schools. In L.B. Flick and N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science (pp. 17-35). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

DeSautels, J. & Larochelle, M. (2006.) About the epistemological posture of science teachers. Online at http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~jossem/ICPE/D3.html on January 15, 2006.

Doyle, W. (1990). Themes in teacher education research. In W. R. Housten (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 3-24). New York: Macmillan.

Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.

Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Duschl, R. A. & Gitomer, D. (1991). Epistemological perspectives on conceptual change: Implications for classroom practice. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 28, 839- 858.

Duschl, R. A., Hamilton, R. J., & Grandy, R. E. (1992). Psychology and epistemology: Match or mismatch when applied to science education? In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). The use and impact of explicit instruction about the nature of science and science inquiry in an elementary science methods course. Science & Education, 11, 55-67.

Ghatala, E. S. (1986). Strategy monitoring training enables young learners to select effective strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 434-454.

Gijlers, H. & de Jong, T. (2005). The relations between prior knowledge and students’ collaborative discovery learning processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 264-282.

Glasson, G. E. & Bentley, M. L. (2000). Epistemological undercurrents in scientists’ reporting of research to teachers. Science Education, 84, 469-485.

Henderson, R. W. (1986). Self-regulated learning: Implications for the design of instructional media. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 405-427.

Herbert, B. E. (2003, November). The role of scaffolding student metacognition in developing mental models of complex, Earth and environmental systems. Paper presented at DFG-NSF International Workshops on Research and Development in Mathematics and Science Education, Washington, DC.

Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students’ knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84, 51-70.

Hogan, K. (1999). Relating students’ personal frameworks for science learning to their cognition in collaborative contexts. Science Education, 83, 1-32.

Hogan, K. (1999). Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students’ collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1085- 1109.

Hogan, K. & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students’ and scientists’ reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 663-687.

Johnson, K. (1991). High school science teachers’ conceptualizations of teaching and learning: Theory and practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 14, 65-78.

Kang, N. & Wallace, C. S. (2004). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals and practices. Science Education, 89, 140-165.

Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariate causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 898-921.

Khishfe, R. & Adb-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explict and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551-578.

Koch, A. (2001). Training in metacognition and comprehension of physics texts. Science Education, 85, 758-768.

Lawson, A. E. (2005). What is the role of induction and deduction in reasoning and scientific inquiry? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 716-740.

Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 29, 331-359.

Lederman, N. G., Wade, P. D. & Bell, R. L. (1998). Assessing the nature of science: What is the nature of our assessments? Science and Education, 7, 595-615.

Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L. & Schwartz, R. S. (2002) Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521.

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

Magntorn, O. & Hellden, G. (2005). Student-teacher’s ability to read nature: Reflections on their learning in ecology. International Journal of Science Education. 27, 1229-1254.

Maxwell, J. A. (2005) Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

McComas, W. F. (2005). Seeking NOS standards: What content consensus exists in popular books on the nature of science. Paper presented at the meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TX.

McComas, W. F., Almazroa, H. & Clough, M. P. (1998). The nature of science in science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 7, 511-532.

McCombs, B. (1986). The role of the self-system in self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 314-332.

Mellado, V. (1997). Preservice teachers’ classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. Science and Education, 6, 331-354.

Mellado, V. (1998). The classroom practice of preservice teachers and their conceptions of teaching and learning science. Science Education, 82, 197-214.

Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers’ conceptions of learners’ prior knowledge. Science Education, 88, 970-983.

Nott, M. & Wellington, J. (1998). Eliciting, interpreting and developing teachers’ understandings of the nature of science. Science and Education, 7, 579-594.

National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R. & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239-1252.

Peters, E. E. (2006, April) The role of classroom management in the social construction of knowledge in science. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Peters, E. E. (manuscript submitted). Scientific Thinking in Eighth Grade Students: Attitude and Metacognition about the Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Sajchowski, R. & Evans, E. D. (1987, April) What is good strategy use and why is it hard to teach?: An optimistic appraisal of the challenges associated with strategy instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Rohrkemper, M. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice (pp. 143-167). New York: Springer.

Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P. & Deci, E. L. (1984). A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.) Research on motivation in education (Vol. 2, pp. 13-52). New York: Academic Press.

Ryer, J., Leach, J. & Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate science students’ images of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 201-219.

Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G. & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610-645.

Schwartz, R. S. & Lederman, N. G. (2002). “It’s the nature of the beast”: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 205-236.

Southerland, S. A., Gess-Newsome, J. & Johnston, A. (2003). Portraying science in the classroom: The manifestation of scientists’ beliefs in classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 669-691.

Thomas, G. P. (2002a). The social mediation of metacognition. In D. McInerny & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on Sociocultural Influences on Motivation and Learning (Vol. 2, pp. 225-247). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Thomas, G. P. (2002b). Conceptualisation, development and validation of an instrument for investigating the metacognitive orientation of science classroom learning environments: The metacognitive orientation learning environment scale – Science (MOLES – S). Learning Environments Research, 6, 175-197.

Thomas, J. W. & Rohwer, W. D., Jr. (1986). Academic studying: The role of learning strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 19-41.

Tobin, K. & McRobbie, C. J. (1997). Beliefs about the nature of science and the enacted science curriculum. Science & Education, 6, 355-371.

Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D. & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137-158.

Wallace, C. S, & Kang, N. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 936-960.

Wang, M. C. & Peverly, S. T. (1986). The self-instructive process in classroom learning contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 370-404.

Weinert, F. E. (1987). Introduction and overview: Metacognition and motivation as determinants of effective learning and understanding. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Weinstein, C. E. & Underwood, V. L. (1985). Learning strategies: The how of learning. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman & R. Glaser (Eds.), New directions in Piagetian theory and practice (pp. 39-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Wetzstein, A. & Hacker, W. (2004). Reflective verbalization improves solutions – The effects of question-based reflection in design problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 145-156.

White, B. Y. (1993). ThinkerTools : Causal models, conceptual change, and science education.

Cognition and Instruction, 10(1), 1-100.

White, B. Y. & Frederickson, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling and metacognition: Making

science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.

Wong, E. D. (2002). To appreciate variation between scientists: A perspective for seeing science’s vitality. Science Education, 86, 386-400.

Zachos, P., Hick, T. L., Doane, W. E. & Sargent, C. (2000). Setting theoretical and empirical foundations for assessing scientific inquiry and discovery in educational programs. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 37, 938-962.

Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A. & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343-367.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated Learning: From Teaching to Self-reflective Practice (pp. 1-19). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. Handbook of Self-Regulation. New York: Academic Press.

Zimmerman, B. J. & Kitsantis (2005). Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, (4) 30, 397-417.