A. The real-world
problem or concern to be addressed in the dissertation study
With the enthusiastic
(perhaps overly enthusiastic) acceptance of online learning, those
charged with providing learning experiences for students in graduate
school are often ill-equipped. The result is that many if not most
online experiences for students are mere replications of a classroom-oriented,
teacher-student model.
During my years at GMU
as a student and instructor, I have been heavily involved in the
creation of online courses. Most of these courses have been designed
using a mentor-protégé model. While content delivery
and activity outlines are published on the web, this model makes
use of email as the primary means of interaction between protégé
and mentor. Email communication, like the telephone, does not easily
afford the opportunity for others to participate in discussions.
While it is possible, to interact with a larger number, email is
historically a person-to-person tool. This tends to reduce interaction
opportunities to private communications between teacher/student,
mentor/protégé.
In my courses and in
my teaching, with Dr. Norton in the ITS program. I have discovered
the real-world application of the types of learning written of by
Vygotsky and others. Namely, that knowledge construction happens
best in a social context. That is to say that students working together
with their peers are able to share and negotiate meaning with and
from their environment. This knowledge and meaning can then be communicated
to the teacher/mentor for evaluation and assessment. To be sure,
communication between mentor and protégé is a form
of social interaction but I fear that we lose the benefits gained
from peer-to-peer interactions in a group setting.
My experiences in learning
and using problem-centered constructivist, techniques has led me
to want to discover whether those types of designs for learning
(group work, social construction of knowledge) can be replicated
in an online environment. In other words, can the types of learning
environments we seek to create in the face-to-face classroom be
created when the learners are not present in a classroom in the
traditional sense.
There are a number of
communication tools available that could provide the opportunity
for students to interact with each other (and their mentor) while
participating in online courses. Discussion boards and chats afford
students and teachers the means to conduct group discussions while
in distant locations, thus approximating the information sharing
and negotiation experiences in the classroom. In many ways, discussion
boards afford a greater flexibility to students and provide a more
robust discussion in that they are asynchronous. Thus, over a span
of time, students can post thoughts, questions, and ideas and then
have the ability to read and reflect on others’ thoughts before
responding. Something that a reticent student in a classroom might
appreciate.
I think that my proposed
study will focus on the perceived quality of learning during a leadership
course. Through the use of a number of instruments, Stages of Concern
Questionnaire (SoCQ), Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI), Web-Based
Learning Environment Inventory (Web-LEI), I hope to gain insight
into students’ attitudes and beliefs concerning their learning
and experiences during an online course. Through surveying students
involved in a Leadership course conducted using the mentor/protégé
model and students involved in the same course delivered through
the Blackboard system, I hope to be able to compare learning experiences
in the two environments.
B. The kinds
of research questions that might be targeted in conducting a study
in this area of inquiry
Overall question: How
do students perceive their learning experiences in mentor/protégé
learning environment compared with those who participated in the
same course using discussion boards and interacting with peers?
-
How
do participants' stages of concern, measured by the SoCQ, change
as a result of participating in the Blackboard course?
-
How
do participants' stages of concern, measured by the SoCQ, change
as a result of participating in the Mentor course?
- Is there a difference
in the students' quality of learning and interactions between
those
involved in the COPLS-based Mentor Course and those in the Blackboard-based
course.
-
How
do participants beliefs and attitudes about online learning compare
after taking the course? (Blackboard vs. Mentor course)
-
What
are participants' attitudes and beliefs about Leadership/Mentoring?
-
How
do participants' attitudes and beliefs change as a result of taking
the Leadership/Mentor course?
C.
The theories, concepts, research literature, and methodological approaches
that are likely to guide the dissertation study.
The study I have chosen
to undertake will seek to compare students' attitudes, beliefs, and
learning in Leadership course modeled on the COPLS (Community of Practice
Learning System) designed by Dr. Norton and those of students taking
the same course using Blackboard Course management system.
The content of both the
COPLS-based and Blackboard-based Leadership course is exactly the
same. The differences between the two models will be the opportunity
students will have to interact with one another. In the COPLS-based
course the student will work on course activities alone and then interact
with the mentor. In the Blackboard course, the students will interact
with each other while completing the course activities and collaborate
on a product.
Obviously, the philosophies
and research done by Dr. Norton are a great influence on the study.
The work of Vygotsky and others on social-constructivism are also
influential in the design.
The design of online learning
environments has been getting more and more attention lately. There
have been research studies done by a number of people on online learning
environments. I found an article by Chang in Australia particularly
interesting. In fact, I would like to use an instrument she developed
to assess students' perceptions of online learning environments in
my study. This instrument assesses the learning environment in a number
of different dimensions.
My planned study will
assess various online learning environments and the effect of each
on students' learning as well as their attitudes and beliefs towards
learning in and using various environments. I think that such a
study would necessitate a design which incorporated both quantitative
and qualitative methodologies.
I would like to utilize
the ITS program's Leadership course which is entirely online for
my study. By dividing the participants up into two groups and having
each group receive a different treatment (the mode of delivery
of the Leadership course) I will be able to gather data to answer
my research questions.
Below is a link to a list
of research papers that I have obtained in order to begin developing
a literature review.
-
Knowledge
and experience in online learning
-
Knowledge
of and experience with mentoring
-
Knowledge
of and experience with designing Learning Environments (online
and 'traditional')
-
Instructional
Design experience
-
Qualitative
Research Skills
-
Quantitative
Research Skills
-
Available
for consultation and advising in 2004