|
For my first six weeks of New Century Colleges I was
in NCLC 110: Community Learners. The name explains a lot of what it was. Each
classroom was a community and the focus was to learn about yourself in and
using the setting of the community. Here
the community is the aid to learning about oneself. The competencies of this
section were communication, information technology, critical thinking, and
group interaction. The sense of community was vital in achieving the
competencies of communication and group interaction. Also communication is a large component of
group interaction so the two coincide just as the students do in order to
fulfill the competency of group interaction. Moreover through the communication
and group interaction of NCLC 110 we as students were supposed to find,
understand, and identify ourselves in the context of others. The goal of NCLC
110 was to establish and know yourself in order to recognize what works for
you, especially in terms of shifting to the new college lifestyle. |
On the other hand NCLC 130’s focus was establishing
a more worldly view that did not revolve around you, as the student. However
personal interpretation of the readings, videos, and discussions was necessary
in order to construct a worldly view the class’s main point was not the
individual. The competencies at play in NCLC 130 were global perspective,
critical thinking, valuing, group interaction, aesthetic response,
communication, effective citizenship, and information technology. Global
perspective I thought was the biggest part of NCLC 130. But, to gain this
global perspective other mechanisms had to come into play such as valuing and
aesthetic response. You had to first be able to identify differences and accept
them as they are. Next you had to be able to construe a response using critical
thinking, and communicate it adequately to others. Doing all of this made me an
effective citizen in the classroom and hopefully eventually of the world also.
In 130 I had to take my individuality I established in 110 and find where I fit
in to the rest of the world. |
| The similarities between 110 and 130 are obvious: group interaction, communication, and information technology. These all tend to be self explanatory. Moreover, under the surface there are more common threads between the two classes. Critical thinking is the main underlying know-how that was not plainly stated in 110 but was definitely present. On the other hand the main difference between the 110 and 130 is the shift from individualistic thinking to a worldly perspective. In 110 I had to work on myself while in 130 I took what I knew and attempted to solve or at least discuss the worlds concerns. |