Energy: Nuclear Energy
Part 2
EVPP 111 Lecture
Dr. Largen
Outline
- Cautionary Tale of Chernobyl
- Nature of nuclear energy
- History of Nuclear Energy
- Nuclear reactors
- Nuclear fuel cycle
- Nuclear weapons
- Concerns about nuclear energy
- Waste disposal
- Nuclear fuel cycle
- series of actions/activities involved in using nuclear fuels to generate energy
- steps
- mining ore
- milling ore
- fuel fabrication
- installing and using fuel rods
- disposing of waste
- mining ore
- low-grade uranium ore
- contains ~0.7% fissionable U-235
- must be enriched
milling ore
extracts uranium from ore
concentrates the U-235
process
"yellowcake"
fuel fabrication
pellets sealed in metal fuel rods ~4m long
installing and using fuel rods
raised or lowered to control reaction
after ~3 years, considered "spent"
disposing of waste
both low- and high-level waste is generated
must be stored
- each step
- involves transport of radioactive materials
- presents possibility of accident or mishandling
- poses health and environmental concerns
nuclear power industry is outgrowth of nuclear weapons industry
environmental contamination around facilities
DOE is responsible for 8600 km2 of properties
- contaminated sites
- underground storage tanks
- 55-gallon drums of radioactive, hazardous or mixed waste in storage
- sites where wastes are moving through soil
- low- and high-level radioactive wastes
importance has been reduced
disposal of nuclear weapons
- Concerns about nuclear energy
- human health and environmental impacts related to
- release of radioactive materials at a power reactor
- Three Mile Island
- Chernobyl
- accidents/mishaps during production and transportation of fuel
- disposal of waste
- text states
- not great cause for concern related to reactor operation
- area of most concern is storage facilities for spent fuel
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) estimates
- 15-45% chance of a complete core meltdown at a US reactor during next 20 years
- 39 US reactors have an 80% chance of containment shell failure from a
- meltdown
- explosion of gases inside containment structures
- nearly half of US plants failed mock terrorist attacks against them
- Three Mile Island
- near Harrisburg, PA
- 3/28/79
- cause of accident
- valve malfunction
- human error
- result
- intense radiation released to interior of containment structure
- small amount of radiation was released into environment
- consequence
- average radiation exposure in surrounding area
- ~ 0.012mSv (~1% of natural background radiation)
- radiation levels near site
- on day 3, 12 mSv/hr was measured at ground level (average American receives about 2 mSv/year)
- days following Chernobyl accident, ~24,000 people received an average dose of 430 mSv
- Concerns about nuclear energy
- thermal pollution
- addition of waste heat to environment
- nuclear power plants
- 2/3 of heat is waste
- fossil fuel power plants
- 1/2 of heat is waste
- nuclear power plants
- use water in cooling processes
- cooling towers
- water
decommissioning
power plant life expectancy is 30-40 years (nuclear or otherwise)
fossil fuel power plants
demolished at end of life
nuclear power plants
not demolished
decommissioned
decommissioning
two-stage process
stage 1
stage 2
utilities have three options
decontaminate and dismantle "immediately"
wait 20-100 years, then dismantle plant
entomb plant
Waste disposal
problem was not fully appreciated when world entered atomic age
waste produced at each step in nuclear fuel cycle
- low-level waste
- give off small amounts of radiation
- must be safely stored for 100-500 years
- sources
- storage/disposal
- 1940’s-1970, in US
- steel drums, dumped in oceans
- ~90,000 drums
- currently
- steel drums, buried in approved sites
high-level waste
give off
large amounts of radiation for short time
small amounts of radiation for long time
must be stored safely for at least 10,000 years
~240,000 if plutonium-239 is not removed by reprocessing
sources
storage/disposal
is any method safe method for storing these wastes
storage/disposal - proposed methods
bury it deep underground
- favored strategy
- under study by all countries producing nuclear waste
shoot it into space or into the sun
bury it under Antarctic or Greenland ice sheet
dump it into subduction zones in deep ocean
bury it in thick deposits of mud on deep ocean floor in areas that tests show have been geologically stable for 65 million years
change it into harmless, or less harmful, isotopes
storage/disposal - US sites
current - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
- near Carlsbad, NM
- began accepting high-level waste in 1999
in development - Yucca Mountain, Nevada
- unpopulated region
- near Nevada Test Site where several nuclear devices were exploded
- very dry area
- water table 600m (1968ft) below surface
- geologically stable (although seismic activity has been witnessed since its selection as site)
- work has begun, considered exploratory
- complete ~2015
- Bush signed resolution in July 2002 to allow construction to proceed
The End