Populations: Evolution and Natural Selection
EVPP 110 Lecture
Instructor: Dr. Largen Fall 2003
- Historical background
- Evidence of evolution
- Darwin’s theory
- Natural selection
- Microevolution
Historical Background
- Ideas about evolution
- originated before Darwin
- mid-350s BC
- 1500s
- 1600s
- 1700s
- 1800s
- mid-350s BC
- Aristotle
- noted evidence of natural similarities and relationships among organisms
- lead him to arrange all organisms he knew into a "Scale of Nature"
- extended from most simple to most complex
- visualized living organisms as being
- imperfect but "moving toward a more perfect state"
- 1500s
- fossils
- term coined in early 1500s
- to describe remains of ancient organisms
- of familiar living organisms
- in unexpected contexts
- marine invertebrate fossils imbedded in rocks on high mountains
- some unlike any known form
- Leonardo da Vinci
- first interpret these finds
- as remains of animals that had existed in past but had become extinct
- 1600s
- emergence of modern scientific
- 1700s
- exploration of continents
- discovery of new species
- emergence of idea
- natural world of living organisms must be guided by natural laws
- as physical world was governed by physical laws
- 1800s
- 1809
- Jean Baptiste de Lamarck,French naturalist, published Philosophie Zoologique
- Charles Darwin born
- Jean Baptiste de Lamarck,French naturalist
- published Philosophie Zoologique, in 1809
- expressed most accepted view of evolution of that time
- all living organisms were endowed with vital force that drove them to change toward greater complexity over time
- organisms could pass traits acquired during their lifetimes on to their offspring
- example, ancestral giraffe
- Darwin’s life
and experiences led to development of his theory of evolution
- born in 1809
- son physician
- sent to University of Edinburgh to study medicine at age 15
- found himself unsuited for medicine
- transferred to Cambridge University to study theology and received his degree
- 1831 (at age 22)
- embarked on 5-year round-the-world voyage
- as naturalist on H.M.S. Beagle
- profoundly influenced his thinking
- during voyage
- read extensively about geology
- collected 1000s of specimens
- plants, animals, fossils, including marine snail fossils in Andes
- observed unique adaptations of organisms
- 1836
- returned to England at end of voyage
- his reading and experiences had led him to
- seriously doubt current thinking of the time
- Earth and living organisms were relatively new and unchangeable
- had come to believe that Earth was very old and constantly changing
- early 1840s
- Darwin had composed an essay describing major features of his theory
- delayed publishing it because
- he knew it would cause a social furor
- mid-1850s
- British naturalist Alfred Wallace, who had been doing field work in Indonesia,
- conceived a theory identical to Darwin’s
- in 1858
- Wallace’s work and excerpts from Darwin’s work were jointly presented to scientific community
- in 1859
- Darwin’s text On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, was published
- didn’t use term "evolution" at first
- referred instead to "descent with modification"
- perceived a unity among species
- all organisms related through descent from unknown organisms that lived in past
- On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection
- maintained that
- as descendants spread into various habitats over millions of years
- they accumulated adaptations that accommodated them to diverse ways of life
- Darwin’s phrase for evolution "descent with modification" captured the idea that
- an ancestral species could diversify into many descendant species
- by accumulation of different adaptations to various environments
- Evidence of evolution
- fossil record
- biogeography
- comparative anatomy
- comparative embryology
- molecular biology
- fossil record
- provides some of strongest evidence of evolution
- an ordered array in which fossils appear within layers, or strata, of sedimentary rock
- each strata can bear a unique set of fossils representing a local sample of organisms that lived when the sediment was deposited
- younger strata are on top of older strata
- position of fossils in strata reveals their relative age
- shows that organisms appeared in a historical sequence
- oldest known fossils
- prokaryotes dating from ~ 3.5 BYA
- younger layers of rock reveal evolution of various groups of eukaryotes
- including successive appearance of various classes of vertebrates
- fishlike, then amphibians, then reptiles, then mammals and birds
- biogeography
- geographical distribution of species
- first suggested to Darwin that organisms evolve from common ancestors
- environment of Galapagos islands resembled that of tropical islands from distant parts of world
- animals of Galapagos more closely resembled species of mainland South America
- Comparative anatomy
- comparison of body structures in different species
- anatomical similarities among many species give sign of common descent
- same skeletal elements make up forelimbs of humans, cats, whales & bats
- since forelimbs of these animals function differently
- would expect their designs would be different, unless
- they all descended from a common ancestor with same basic limb structure
- homologous structures
- features that have different functions but are structurally similar because of common ancestry
- Comparative embryology
- study of structures that appear during development of different organisms
- closely related organisms often have similar stages in their embryonic development
- one sign that vertebrates evolved from a common ancestor
- all of them have an embryonic stage in which structures called gill pouches appear on sides of throat
- at that stage, embryos of fishes, frogs, snakes, birds, apes look more alike than different
- Molecular biology
- study of molecular basis of genes and gene expression
- universality of genetic code is strong evidence that all life is related
- related individuals have greater similarity in their DNA than do unrelated individuals of same species
- two closely related species have a greater proportion of their DNA in common than more distantly related species
Darwin’s Theory
- In The Origin of Species
- Darwin focused on how organisms become adapted to their environments
- his theory arose from several key observations
- all species tend to produce more offspring than environment can support
- individuals of a population vary in their traits
- organisms’ variations can be inherited by their offspring
- all species tend to produce excessive numbers of offspring
(overproduction)
- production of more individuals than an environment can support
- leads to a struggle for existence
- natural resources are limited
- only a percentage of offspring in each generation survive and reproduce
- rest are starved, eaten, frozen, diseased, unmated, unable to reproduce for some other reason
- Individuals of a population vary extensively in their characteristics
- individuals whose characteristics make them best suited (adapted) to their environment are most likely to survive
- most likely to reproduce
- leave more offspring than less "fit" (adapted) individuals
- Many of varying traits of individuals in a population can be passed from one generation to the next
(heritable variations)
- individuals whose traits make them best suited to an environment are more likely to survive and reproduce and
- traits that made them well adapted to their environment are likely to be inherited by their offspring
Natural selection
- natural selection
- proposed by Darwin as basic mechanism of evolution
- essence of which is differential, or unequal, success in reproduction
- not all individuals have equal success in reproduction
- higher reproductive success
- occurs in individuals that are well adapted to their environment
- these individuals will reproduce and pass on their traits
- their traits will become more heavily represented in the next generation than will the traits of poorly adapted individuals
- lower reproductive success
- occurs in individuals that are poorly adapted to their environment
- these individuals will reproduce less
- their traits will become more less and less common in subsequent generations
- individuals that are well adapted to their environment can be said to be most fit for that environment, or the "fittest"
- hence phrase "survival of the fittest"
- natural selection leads to, in subsequent generations,
- favored traits (well adapted) will be represented more and more
- unfavored traits (poorly adapted) will be represented less and less
- unequal ability of individuals to survive and reproduce leads to
- gradual change in characteristics of a population of organisms
- over generations
- favored characteristics accumulate
- unfavored characteristics disappear
provided Darwin with evidence for his ideas on natural selection
definition
- selective breeding of domesticated plants & animals
- by selecting individuals with desired traits as breeding stock, humans were playing role of environment and bringing about differential reproduction
plants
- broccoli, cauliflower, cabbages, brussel sprouts, kale and kohlrabi are all varieties of a single species of wild mustard that were produced by artificial selection
animals
- hundreds of varieties of domestic dog, a single species called Canis familiaris, are result of 1000s of years of artificial selection
- many species of canines resulted from 1000s to millions of years of natural selection
- Darwin reasoned
- if artificial selection could bring about so much change in a relatively short period of time
- then natural selection over vast spans of time would result in gradual accumulation of hertitable changes that would result in evolution of new species
- as in five species of canines thought to have evolved from a single ancestral canine
- natural selection in action
- many examples have been documented
- peppered moth
- exists in two forms
- light colored with splotches of darker pigment (where it gets its name)
- uniformly dark variety
- feed at night, rest during the day, on trees & rocks encrusted with lichens
- light variety is well-camouflaged against lichens, protected from predators
- dark variety is conspicuous, therefore not protected from predators
- Great Britain, prior to Industrial Revolution
- dark variety of moth was rare
- not camouflaged against lichens
- became prey for birds before they could reproduce and pass onto next generation their genes for dark coloration
- late 1800s, pollution from Industrial Revolution killed large numbers of lichens, exposing darker tree bark or rock
- dark variety of moth became increasingly more abundant
- now was camouflaged against dark surface and lighter variety was not
- by early 1900s, in some industrial areas, populations consisted almost entirely of dark variety
group of individuals of same species living in same place at same time
is smallest unit that can evolve
in moth example, it was population, not individual moths, that evolved
- population is smallest unit that can evolve
- evolution can be measured as
- a change in prevalence of certain heritable traits in a population over a succession of generations
- Darwin
- understood
- it is populations that evolve
- did not understand
- genetic basis of population change
Darwin could not explain
cause of variation among individuals making up a population
perpetuation of parents’ traits in their offspring
Due to knowledge that came after Darwin, it is now understood that
mutations in genes may produce new traits
heritable traits are carried by genes on chromosomes
current version of theory of evolution that includes genetics
was developed in early 1940s
focuses on populations as units of evolution
includes most of Darwin’s ideas
melds population genetics with theory of natural selection
requires an understanding of relationship between populations and species
sexual species (biological species)
group of populations whose individuals have potential to interbreed & produce fertile offspring
Microevolution
- Studying evolution at population level
- focuses on
- gene pool
- total collection of genes in a population at any one time
- reservoir from which members of next generation will derive their genes
- can be studied by observing changes in relative frequencies of alleles over time
- For most genes, there are 2 or more alleles (varieties)
- a population at a given time can be described by relative frequencies of a particular set of alleles
- over time, relative frequencies of particular alleles in population can change as result of natural selection
- leads to microevolution
- change in gene pool
- as in moth example
- frequency of each allele in gene pool will remain constant unless acted on by other agents
- population to which this applies is said to be in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
- Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
- suggests that something other than sexual reproduction is required to alter a gene pool
- by changing allele frequencies from one generation to next
- One way to determine what factors can change a gene pool is
- identify conditions necessary to maintain genetic equilibrium
- following 5 conditions must be met
- population is very large
- population is isolated
- no movement into or out of population
- gene mutations do not alter gene pool
- mating is random
- all individuals are equal in reproductive success
- natural selection does not occur
- five conditions necessary for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
- rarely occur in nature
- equilibrium breaks down
- allele frequencies in natural populations change constantly
basically reverse of 5 necessary conditions for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
5 causes of microevolution
genetic drift
gene flow
mutation
nonrandom mating
natural selection
change in gene pool of a small population due to chance
in small population, chance event can have a disproportionately large effect
- altering gene pool in next generation
- iguana example, assume a small population (3 WW, 2 Ww and 5 ww)
- an earthquake kills 3 iguana
- 3 dead iguanas were all WW
- frequency of W allele in next generation would be reduced
two subtypes
- bottleneck effect
- founder effect
bottleneck effect
- results from event that drastically reduces population size
- event kills large numbers of individuals unselectively
- produces small surviving population that is not likely to have same genetic makeup as original population
- certain alleles will be present at higher frequencies, other alleles will be present at lower frequencies
founder effect
results from random change in a gene pool that occurs in a small colony
colonization of a new location by a single pregnant individual or a small # of individuals
gene pool of subsequent generations will be derived from just these few individuals
thought to have been important in evolution of many species in Galapagos Islands
- Gene flow
- gain or loss of alleles from a population by movement of individuals or gametes
- occurs when
- fertile individuals move into or out of a population
- gametes are transferred from one population to another
- minimizes genetic differences between populations
- reduced by reproductive isolation
- which increases genetic differences between populations
- increased by
random change in an organism’s DNA that creates a new allele
rare event for any given gene
- occur ~ once per gene locus per 105 to 106 gametes
little effect on large population in a single generation
over time, vital to evolution because
- ultimate source of genetic variation
- serves as raw material for evolution
selection of a mate other than by chance
- random mating (chance) would require
- every male (female) in population have an equal chance of mating with every female (male) in population
- is rare in nature
nonrandom mating is the norm in most populations
- for example, in humans, short males tend to marry short females
- Natural selection
- fifth agent of microevolution
- differential success in reproduction
- most likely to result in adaptive changes in a gene pool
- Some genetic variation
- seems to have a trivial impact on reproductive success
- therefore may not be subject to natural selection
- neutral variation hypothesis
- proposes that species have some alleles that confer no selective advantage or disadvantage
- frequencies of these alleles may increase or decrease as a result of chance genetic drift
- but natural selection will not affect them
- human fingerprints are probably an example of neutral variation
contribution an individual makes to gene pool of next generation relative to contribution made by other individuals
fittest individuals in an evolutionary context are those that pass on the greatest number of genes to the next generation
Individuals with a high degree of fitness
those whose phenotypic traits enable them to reproduce and contribute genes to more offspring than other individuals
Favored genotypes
those whose positive phenotypic effects outweigh any harmful effects they may have on reproductive success of organism
By culling less fit individuals, natural selection also culls unfavored genotypes
natural selection can alter phenotypic variations in an idealized population
three main ways
- stabilizing selection
- directional selection
- diversifying selection
- Stabilizing selection
- favors intermediate variants
- typically occurs in relatively stable environments
- where conditions tend to reduce phenotypic variation
- probably prevails most of time in most populations
- Directional selection
- shifts overall makeup of population by acting against individuals at one of phenotypic extremes
- most common
- during periods of environmental change
- when members of a species migrate to new habitat with different environmental conditions
- Diversifying selection
- typically occurs when environmental conditions are varied in a way that favors individuals at
- both extremes of a phenotypic range
- rather than intermediate individuals
- Natural selection can produced resistant populations of pests and parasites
- new pesticide, antibiotic, drug is fairly effective killing all but a few individuals in target population when first used
- few survivors live and reproduce because, by chance, they have genes that protect them (provide resistance)
- they pass these protective traits on to their offspring
- eventually, most of population consists of resistant individuals
The End