PUBP 715, Transportation Systems

SYLLABUS – Fall 2003

Basic Course Information

Time:

Thursday, 4:30 p.m. – 7:10 p.m.

Sections:

 

001 – GMU Arlington Campus, rm. 109 “Original” Building

002 – Via interactive television using (Virginia locations)

621 – Via interactive television using (Montana location, graduate)

BIS 489.621 – Via interactive television (Montana location, undergraduate)

Instructor:

Jonathan L. Gifford

Telephone

703-993-2275

Fax:

801-749-9198

E-mail:

jgifford@gmu.edu

Office hours:

Arlington “Original” rm. 266, Generally Monday – Friday, 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. An appointment is strongly recommended if you’re making a special trip.

Course Description

This course is about transportation systems. It examines their history and development, their contribution to society and impact on it, the institutions and practices that govern their planning, design, construction, operation, maintenance, and decommissioning, the policy and managerial challenges that they pose, and the tools and techniques available for addressing them.

Transportation is a service that contributes substantially to the well being of advanced economies. Personal mobility, whether by bicycle, car, bus or aircraft, occupies a significant part of almost every citizen’s day. And virtually all household goods—furniture, food, appliances and clothing—are the result of often complex chains of supply, production and distribution in which transportation plays a critical part.

The resource requirements and byproducts of transportation also pose sobering environmental challenges for society. Landscape, noise, energy dependence, air and water quality, and perhaps even global climate are all profoundly affected by society’s choices about transportation. The safety and security of the transportation system is also tremendously important to quality of life and economic efficiency.

Master’s in Transportation Policy, Operations & Logistics

This course is the first course in the Master of Arts in Transportation Policy, Operations & Logistics. As such, it introduces provides a general introduction transportation systems and their policy, operational and logistical dimensions. More information about the program can be found at http://tpol.gmu.edu.

Requirements

Paper No. 1 – System Description and Evaluation (15% of grade)

Complete a “Transportation Policy, Operations or Logistics Description and Evaluation,” approximately 500 words in length, plus appendices if desired (due in week 5), describing and evaluating a transportation activity with which you are familiar. Your description and evaluation should take a systems perspective, that is, it should not be simply a “user’s eye” view of the activity but rather synoptic or societal. You should clearly state the evaluation criteria you are using. It should generally focus on the activities of one organization, for example, VDOT’s traffic sign management, or the City of Alexandria’s bicycle and pedestrian program.

You should utilize any of Sussman’s “Key Points” that are germane. Also, your paper should be objective, examining both the pros and cons of any point of view expressed, and clearly state the criteria being used to evaluate the system. Source material and evidence should be cited. Note the general guidelines for papers below.

Two Critiques (15% each)

Prepare two critiques of assigned readings of your choice. Each critique should be an essay of about 1200-1500 words in length that briefly summarizes the reading and then gives your assessment of it. Roughly speaking, about half of the critique should be dedicated to summarizing the major points of the reading. The balance of the essay should contain your assessment, including your judgment or interpreta­tion of the significance of the reading, how it relates to the broader themes of the course, its balance and objectivity, completeness, and whether its claims are backed by appropriate evidence. The key point of the critique is to assess what in the reading is important for the transportation policy, operations and logistics professional.

Not all readings are eligible for written critiques. Critiques may be of any reading designated with a double dagger (‡) in the assigned reading schedule.

Critiques are due on the day of the class meeting on which they are assigned – regardless of whether the actual class schedule slips.

Paper No. 2 (35%)

Write a 2000- to 2500-word paper about a problem or issue of your choice related to transportation policy, operations or logistics, due in week 12. The paper should have an analytical focus, which means that it should have a central analytical question and apply specific criteria to the analysis of that question. Papers that simply describe a problem or situation are not acceptable.

You will probably need to rely on a wide range of sources, including the academic literature, subject area experts, industry and trade publications, and promotional and marketing materials by vendors. Some of these may be from the Internet. You should carefully identify and cite source material. Note the general paper guidelines below.

Presentation (10%)

Present a critique of the readings for one week as part of a class discussion of the material. Assignments for the specific week’s readings will be made at the beginning of the semester. Peer reviews for the presentations will be completed by students observing the participation, using the attached “Speech Evaluation Form.” Peer evaluations will be provided to the presenter(s) and not reviewed by the instructor. The instructor will also complete a “Speech Evaluation Form” for the presenter(s), which he will use for grading the assignment.

Class Participation (10%)

Participate in class discussions demonstrating command of assigned material and the ability to relate the concepts to other transportation issues.

Note: Students who are unable to attend classes during which graded work is to be submitted or presented will be asked to provide appropriate documentation of the reason for their absence.

Resubmitting Papers

Students may resubmit papers to be re-graded, subject to the following conditions:

1)      Resubmissions are accepted up to 1 week after papers are returned

2)      Resubmitted papers must …

a)      be a substantive rewrite; papers should have been grammatically correct the first time.

b)      follow a visit (virtually or in person) the Writing Center for a review of the paper (http://writingcenter.gmu.edu).

c)      include a writer’s memo discussing how the paper is improved, and why it’s worth my time to reread it. This needn’t be more than a half page or so.

d)      include the original submission and grading sheet.

3)      You may also include additional revisions of papers from the semester in an end-of-semester portfolio, which must be submitted in week 14, the last class. The same rules apply regarding the writer’s memo and including earlier submissions.

Text Materials

There principal textbooks are:

  1. Sussman, J. (2000) Introduction to Transportation Systems (Boston, Artech House).
  2. Meyer, J. R., Gómez-Ibánez, J. A., Tye, W. B. & Winston, C. (1999) Essays in Transportation Economics and Policy: A Handbook in Honor of John R. Meyer (Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press).
  3. Diana Hacker, A Pocket Manual of Style, latest edition (New York:  Bedford/St. Martin’s Press).

Additional readings will be available in photocopy or through the university’s electronic reserves system. (http://oscr.gmu.edu/).

Instructor

The course instructor is Jonathan L. Gifford, who is the Director of the Master’s in Transportation Policy, Operations & Logistics and an associate professor in the School of Public Policy. He is an authority on transportation and infrastructure policy, with particular expertise in the areas of ITS, highway policy, urban transportation planning, airport and air traffic control policy, and the development of technical standards. He is the author of more than thirty articles and the author or editor of four books.

Recent research areas include: technical standard setting through consortia; policy objectives and general requirements for deploying signal preemption and priority systems in the greater Washington, D.C. region; improving public acceptance of infrastructure projects; lessons from institutional restructuring in electric power, telecommunications, highways and air traffic control; and smart card technology for licensing commercial drivers.

He earned his B.S. in civil engineering at Carnegie Mellon University, and his M.S. and Ph.D. in civil engineering (transportation) from the University of California, Berkeley, with minor fields in economics and urban and regional planning. His dissertation analyzed the development and impacts of the Interstate highway system.

General Paper Guidelines

1)      Student papers should be original work specifically undertaken for the purpose of this course. If a student is utilizing his own work undertaken as part of a job, for another course, or from other extracurricular activity, he must specify that in a preface or footnote. If a paper relies substantially on work undertaken for extracurricular activities, the student should seek explicit instructor approval.

2)      Papers are graded on the basis of three distinct sets of criteria: 1) the quality of the content, 2) their structure and organization, and 3) their “mechanics,” which refers to their proper use of grammar, citation, punctuation, and so forth. A sample “grading criteria” sheet is attached.

3)      Paper Length. Word counts specified for papers are exclusive of footnotes, endnotes, or appendix material. Please note the word count on the cover page.

4)      Papers must be typed.

5)      Papers should have a cover page, but do not put papers in covers, binders or any other kind of package.

6)      No late assignments will be accepted without the instructor’s prior approval.

7)      The instructor may ask to review your source material. Do not discard it for at least a month after your final paper is turned in.

8)      Plagiarism. Inappropriate use of others’ work without attribution is plagiarism and violates George Mason University’s Honor Code (http://www.gmu.edu/facstaff/‌handbook/‌aD.html). Please familiarize yourself with its provisions. Honor Code violations can be punished by expulsion from the University. To guard against plagiarism and treat everyone equally, written work will be checked against existing published and web materials. Accordingly, the instructor reserves the right to request all written work in electronic form.

9)      Finding and evaluating source material. Remember that some sources are more credible than others, and it’s up to you the researcher to evaluate the credibility of a source and the particular facts, ideas or positions it advances. All sources are not created equal!

10)  Style

a)      The term “style” refers to the way a paper treats headings, footnotes, bibliographic citations, illustrations, tables, etc. In professional writing, it is important to be aware of style and to follow the appropriate style guidelines for what you are writing. The Hacker text is a style guide used across the School of Public Policy. It specifies a range of styles that are common in academic and professional writing. Papers for this course should follow the “Chicago footnote” style.

b)      In addition, papers for this course require the following: (i) include source information for all figures and tables; and (ii) include a bibliography of all source material at the end of your paper if you have source material that has not appeared in your footnotes.

c)      The use of source material from the internet or other electronic forms is increasingly common. If you use such material, you must cite it correctly. Refer to Hacker for appropriate citation guidelines.


Schedule

Week

Date

Subject

Reading (Note: * indicates a text book; indicates material on electronic reserve at http://oscr.gmu.edu); indicates a reading that may be used as the subject of your written critiques.

Assignment

1

8/28

Introduction

†‡Jonathan L. Gifford, Flexible Urban Transportation (Oxford: Elsevier Sciences, 2003), chaps. 1-4.

*Sussman, chaps. 1-3.

Note: Students choosing the Gifford chapters as the subject of a critique may submit the critique during the second week of class.

 

Part I: Context, Concepts & Characterization

2

9/4

Transportation Systems Concepts

*Sussman, chaps. 4-6

Joseph Sussman, “Educating the New Transportation Professional,” ITS Quarterly 3, no. 1 (Summer 1995).

U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, “Transportation Indicators” (most recent).

1-page bio

3

9/11

Cont’d (Taught from Helena, MT)

*Sussman, chaps. 7-9

†‡Jonathan L. Gifford and William L Garrison, “Airports and the Air Transportation System: Functional Refinements and Functional Discovery,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 43, no. 2 (March 1993): 103-23. Available through ScienceDirect.

 

4

9/18

Cont’d

*Sussman, Chaps. 10-11

†‡John Majewski, review of Internal Improvement: National Public Works and the Promise of Popular Government in the Early United States, by John Lauritz Larson (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001), EH.Net July 2001, http://www.eh.net/bookreviews/library/0381.shtml.

†‡Phil Anderson, “Majewski on Larson,” e-mail to William Harris (August 2 2001).

†‡Esther Redmount, review of Marketing Michelin: Advertising and Cultural Identity in Twentieth-Century France, by Stephen L. Harp (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001), EH.Net September 2002, http://eh.net/bookreviews/library/0541.shtml.

Note: Students may only choose Majewski, Anderson and Redmount as the subject of a single critique.

 

Freight Transportation

5

9/25

Logistics (Taught from Suffolk, VA)

*Sussman, chaps. 12, 19, 20 (chaps. 13-18, optional)

†‡Ronald H. Ballou, “Transport Fundamentals,” in Business Logistics Management, 4th ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999), 135-84.

Paper #1

6

10/2

Supply chain management; intermodal transport

†‡Brian Slack, “Intermodal Transportation,” in Handbook of Logistics and Supply-Chain Management, Chap. 9, ed. Ann M. Brewer, Kenneth J. Button and David A. Hensher, Handbooks in Transport, vol. 2 (Amsterdam: Pergamon, 2001), 141-54.

†‡John Dumond, et al., Velocity Management: The Business Paradigm That Has Transformed U.S. Army Logistics (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2001), http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1108/, chaps 1,5, 6.

 

7

10/9

Regulation

*TEP, chap. 14, 15

 

8

10/16

(cont’d)

*TEP, chaps. 8, 9, 16

 

9

10/23

 

*TEP, chap. 16

Shawn Zeller, "Blowout," National Journal (April 28 2001): 1216-25. Available through ProQuest.

Shawn Zeller, "The Fireman for Bridgestone/Firestone," National Journal (April 28 2001): 1226. Available through ProQuest.

 

Traveler Transportation

10

10/30

Urban transportation

*Sussman, chap. 21-22

*TEP, chap. 11

 

11

11/6

(cont’d)

*TEP, chaps. 12, 13

†‡Piet Rietveld, “Biking and Walking: The Position of Non-Motorized Transport Modes in Transport Systems,” in Handbook of Transport Systems and Traffic Control, ed. K.J. Button and D.A. Hensher, vol. 3, Handbooks in Transport (Amsterdam: Pergamon, 2001), 299-319.

 

12

11/13

(cont’d)

*Sussman, chap. 23-24

*TEP, chaps. 6, 7

Paper #2

13

11/20

Motorization, accessibility & economic opportunity

*Sussman, chaps. 25, 28

*TEP, chaps. 10, 13

†‡Kingsley E. Haynes and Kenneth J. Button, "Transportation Systems and Economic Development," in Handbook of Transportation Systems and Traffic Control, ed. Kenneth J. Button and David A. Hensher, vol. 3, Handbooks in Transport (Amsterdam: Pergamon, 2001), 255-68.

 

 

11/27

Thanksgiving Day (no class)

14

12/4

Review, wrap-up

 

All resubmitted papers

 

12/11

Final examination

No class meeting

 


WRITING EVALUATION CRITIERIA

Name:

Date:

Assignment:

Grade:

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Comment

Quality of Content

 

Addresses assignment

 

 

 

 

Analytical clarity/persuasiveness

 

 

 

 

Objectivity

 

 

 

 

Quality of source material

 

 

 

 

Use of evidence/methodology

 

 

 

 

Structure & Organization (S&O)

 

Clear intro, thesis, conclusion

 

 

 

 

Use of transitions, headings and other cohering strategies

 

 

 

 

Logical & coherent paragraphing in support of main points

 

 

 

 

Mechanics

 

Correct citation, documentation

 

 

 

 

Required elements (title page, works cited [if more than those in footnotes]), length (word count), page #

 

 

 

 

Grammar, spelling, punctuation, article use

 

 

 

 

Abbreviations/symbols in comments: ¶ = paragraph; # = number agreement; awk = awkward; frag = sentence fragment (incomplete sentence); wc = word choice; pv = passive voice


Speech Evaluation Form

Presenter: _______________________

Date: ___________________________

Content

 

____ (50 pts)

Introduction

Captures our attention

 

 

Establishes strong credibility

 

 

Previews presentation structure

 

 

 

 

Body

Audience orientation

 

 

Clear organization

 

 

Thorough analysis/sound reasoning

 

 

Solid support

 

 

 

 

Conclusion

Summarizes key ideas

 

 

Provides strong final thought

 

 

 

 

Time limit

 

 

Q&A

 

 

Vocal Qualities

____ (15 pts)

Volume

 

 

Vocal variety

 

 

Vocal pacing

 

 

Articulation

 

 

Non-fluencies (um, ah, etc.)

 

Body Language

____ (15 pts)

Eye contact

 

 

Facial expressions

 

Gestures

 

 

Posture

 

 

Movement

 

 

Visual Support

____ (20 pts)

Appropriate

 

 

Enhanced understanding

 

Clear and concise

 

Easily seen

 

 

Handled effectively

 

 

Total

____ (100 pts)