Was the “Open Door Policy” of 1900 - 1910 Beneficial to China?
Defying the Will of the Chinese People
Koekkoek, Johannes. Boxers Drawing. Circa 1900. Le Figaro, Hors-Serie "Pekin". Wikimedia Commons Library.
<http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b5/BoxersDrawingByKoekkoek1900.jpg>.
With the enforcement of the “open door
policy” by the beginning of the twentieth century, an increase in
social discontent occurred because China was now open for all trade
powers to have economic opportunity and access to their market. Among
the angry population it was primarily the pro-traditionalist leaders
and the peasantry classes that held the most disdain for the Europeans
(Tignor 310). Throughout this period of economic “hegemony”
(Abu-Lughod and Life) where Western nations are
using political and military means of forcing China to keep its trade
open and available to all who wish to partake in the Far East trade,
there were also missionaries being sent over to convert the Chinese to
Christianity (Tignor 315). The emperor Guangxu of the Qing dynasty at
this time was a pro-modernist who tried to enforce the “Hundred
Days Reform” in 1898 in response to the “open door
policy” to try to Westernize some of China’s political and
economic aspects, but the Empress Dowager Cixi placed a house arrest on
him and ruled alongside the eunuchs from the Forbidden City (Overfield
22). Cixi took an anti-foreign traditionalist stance and used the
Boxers to her advantage, supporting the movement of the Righteous and
Harmonious Fists that was to follow in 1899 (Boxer).
The Righteous and Harmonious Fists were a group that
the Westerners referred to as the “Boxers” because they
were well trained in martial arts; these troops led the Boxer Rebellion
in 1899 (Overfield 22). The rebellion started in Shandong and was a
direct response to the “open door policy” and also the
Western Christianizing of China (Tignor 316). The “Boxers”
had a set of proclamations explaining the evils of the foreigners and
how it was the up to them to eradicate them from China. A small excerpt
from their proclamations goes as follows:
The Gods assist the Boxers,
The Patriotic Harmonious corps,
It is because the “Foreign
Devils” disturb the “Middle Kingdom.”
Urging the people to join their
religion,
To turn their backs on Heaven,
Venerate not the Gods and forget
the ancestors. (Two)
Essentially the main meaning of this excerpt is that the internal and
external troubles of China is due to the presence of the multiple
European, U.S., and Japanese powers in their country whom they refer to
as devils. There is reference to the disdain held by the Chinese
because of the foreign missionaries trying to impose religious
ideologies and have the Chinese forget their customs and traditions of
honoring their Gods and ancestors.
What rallied the Boxers to be the fearless and
seemingly impenetrable force that they were was the belief that they
had a just and divine mission and that they were assisted by their Gods
to be an invincible force that could disperse any foreign powers from
China. One of the Boxers mottos during the rebellion was actually
“Support the Qing, destroy the foreign” (Tignor 316). Here
is another excerpt from their proclamations explaining their strategy
to victory:
The Gods come out from grottoes,
The Genii come down from
mountains,
Support the human bodies to
practice the boxing.
When all the military
accomplishments or tactics
Are fully learned,
It will not be difficult to
exterminate the “Foreign Devils” then. (Two)
This bit of the proclamation describes how the Chinese Gods will give
them special abilities to learn the “yikequan” style of
martial arts which was a form of “magic” boxing according
to Chinese belief (Overfield 24). The Boxer army comprised of only male
fighters, however as part of the rebellion there was also a female
troop called the Red Lanterns that also opposed foreign intrusion upon
China. This group consisted of women who were believed to have magical
abilities such as flight or walking on water. They represented purity
and were there for the purpose of counteracting any female Christians
or missionaries and protecting the Boxers from ‘falling’
for them (Tignor 316). This showed a unification of not only the lower
and working classes with the pro-traditionalist leaders, but also a
unification of gender to fight together for a single cause - to
eradicate the foreigners. However, the way the rebellion was put down
was what really had hurt China the most.
With any rebellion promoting a violent way to meet
ends, it is to be expected there are casualties. By 1900 the Qing
government had officially vocalized support for the Boxer Rebellion,
which in essence was an indirect declaration of war on the foreign
powers of whom their missionaries and diplomats were being slaughtered
and laid siege to in their embassies by the Boxers. (Secretary) The
rebellion took a few hundred lives of foreign missionaries but had a
larger impact on the Chinese population, killing thousands of nationals
(Secretary). The casualties on the Chinese side was so great because
when the rebellion had broken out on a full scale, a foreign army
consisting of “20,000 troops belonging to Japan, Russia, Europe,
and the U.S.” fought and claimed victory over the Boxers, forcing
the Qing government to sign the Boxer Protocol in 1901 (Tignor 317).
The Boxer Protocol was a peace treaty the Qing
government signed to signify the ending of the war between China and
the foreigners and resulted in a humiliating defeat for them. Some of
the requirements of the treaty was to have to pay war reparations and
an indemnity of $333 million to the nations involved in the crossfire
of the rebellion, further worsening China’s economic situation
(Secretary). Another requirement was to have Western troops permanently
stationed in Beijing near the foreign embassies to ensure nothing of
the nature would happen again (Tignor 317). Lastly, the Qing government
had to agree to a revamped version of the “open door
policy” known as the “new policy” which essentially
gave foreign powers larger spheres of influence that originally began
in trade port cities, but now stretched further into China’s
inner area (Tignor 317 and Secretary). By this point China was so
indebted financially to the foreign powers and had no other choice but
to meet their demands in its politically and financially weakened
state, comparable to the latter twentieth century situation with
economic “hegemony” of Jamaica and U.S. / British
capitalist involvement (Abu-Lughod and Life).
After China’s reaction to foreign involvement
by trying a rebellion, continued Western involvement with the
“open door policy” seemed unjust and even barbaric to the
Chinese. Once the government had given into the foreigner’s
demands, greater anti-foreign sentiment and now anti-Qing sentiment
developed (Tignor 317). After this atrocity, it is quite clear that the
“open door policy” was definitely a policy out of U.S.
interest in disregard to what was good for China and its people.