Protocol for posting threads and contributing to an online discussion are as follows:

• Postings should be evenly distributed during the discussion period (not concentrated all on one day or at the beginning and/or end of the period).
• Postings should be a minimum of one short paragraph and a maximum of two paragraphs.
• Avoid postings that are limited to 'I agree' or 'great idea', etc. If you agree (or disagree) with a posting then say why you agree by supporting your statement with concepts from the readings or by bringing in a related example or experience.
• Address the questions as much as possible (don't let the discussion stray).
• Try to use quotes from the articles that support your postings. Include page numbers when you do that.
• Build on others responses to create threads.
• Bring in related prior knowledge (work experience, prior coursework, readings, etc.)
• Use proper etiquette (proper language, typing, etc.).

Tips for posting to discussion forums:

"Nobody responds to me! How do I post successfully? How do I get my friends to read my posts?"

• Think of the assignment in terms of a dialogue not a writing exercise. You want to engage yourself in a discussion about the texts and issues of the course
• This means: elaborate one single idea and keep your message to one paragraph (150-200 words). Texts longer than 150-200 words are harder to follow on screen. Of course, better-formulated and clear posts attract more attention.
• Before you post: think about the assignment first and take (mental notes) before you read other responses
• Think of a thesis and how you can support your thesis
• Then read other posts, respond to one that contradicts, or supports your own thoughts; one that is lacking evidence or seems to fall short on an aspect that is important to you
• In your response, you can also turn your own thoughts into questions, offer your argument (remember, an opinion is not an argument); play the devil's advocate; ask challenging questions
• Avoid hermetic responses that offer only right and wrong perspectives and ignore other possible answers
• If you are the first to post: post with a careful analysis and strong (bold) argument (thesis) and open-ended questions that invite dialogue
• It helps for the readers of your post, if you include a specific quotation from the message you respond to (xx said:""); this way we know who you are referring too
• Choose your title carefully (titles, such as "1. Assignment," are far less compelling than content related titles)
• Once you have posted, check back if anybody has responded to you and get the dialogue going

Evaluation criteria for facilitating an online/class discussion:

• The discussants will demonstrate an observable understanding of the articles being discussed. The understanding will be at the critical thinking and synthesis level.
• The discussants will demonstrate an ability to engage the audience in a discussion that is relevant to the topics of the articles and related concepts. This can be done in a variety of ways including but not limited to: posing engaging questions; eliciting responses; engaging the learners in an activity or task.
• The discussants will demonstrate the ability to effectively organize the discussion. This includes: keeping the discussion focused on the topic; providing structure (beginning arguments, closing arguments, wrap-up or synthesis); staying within the timeframe alotted for discussion; using effective media (if applicable).
• The discussants will demonstrate the ability to respond to questions effectively.
• The discussants will demonstrate the ability to relate the concepts discussed in the articles to personal and professional experience by using examples from everyday practices.
  

Rubric for evaluating online discussions: