The history of SF overlaps with the history of mimetic fiction;
Samuel R. Delany calls it "paraliterary," making it comparable
to westerns, mysteries, and comics (Delany, "Science
and Literature" 9). Attempts have been made to give SF the respectability
of pedigree, plus lists and lists of definitions, but a more fruitful
approach may be to focus on how one recognizes a text as SF. A sentence
may read quite differently when it appears in SF from the way it reads
in "mainstream fiction (Delany, "Some
Presumptuous Assumptions..." 49): try these
examples and notice the shift in meaning for some of them. To define SF by listing surface features is a reductive approach, gleaning from images (the spaceship, the robot, the monster) that appeared originally in "pulps" and were appropriated by films. Gwyneth Jones calls these images "iconic" because they are meaningful even outside their narrative contexts, and because they are also deeply evocative of the tensions between known and unknown or of audience anxieties about technology. One useful definition: "A good SF story is a story with human problem and a human solution, which would not have happened at all without its science content" (Theodore Sturgeon). "Mode" vs. "Genre"On the way to protocols it is helpful to shift from the concept of genre ( a set of expectations developed across time) to the concept of mode (the way the story is written--as fantastic instead of mimetic). A few SF "icons" may create an exotic surface impression, but a credible SF world creates "imaginative at-homeness" (Seamus Heaney) as the narrative develops.
|
Main |
Defining SF |
Defining Cyberpunk |
SF and Postmodernism |
The Motifs of Cyberpunk |
A Short Bibliography |
Amelia A. Rutledge
English Department
Updated 1/17/2005