College of Education and
Human Development
A-Robinson Hall
Suite A-323
4400 University Drive
Fairfax, VA 22030-4444
(voice) (703) 993-8136
(fax) 703 ) 993-3336
josterli@gmu.edu
|
Summer 2002
George Mason University
Graduate School of Education
EDCI 516-B01
BILINGUALISM AND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION RESEARCH
Summer 2002 - Session B

Instructor: |
Jorge P. Osterling, Ph.D. |
Class Day & Time: |
M-W 4:30 PM - 7:10 PM |
|
May 29 - July 17, 2002 |
Class Location: |
B-Robinson, 205 |
Contact Information:: |
|
|
|
Office: |
A-Robinson, 451-B
Center for Multilingual/ Multicultural Education |
E-Mail: |
josterli@gmu.edu |
Office Hours: |
Immediately after class or by appointment. |
Profile: |
http://cehd.gmu.edu//profiles/josterlin.htm |
Telephone: |
(703) 993-8136 |
Fax: |
(703) 993-3336 |
COURSE OUTLINE
Back to top
Course Description:
EDCI 516-B01: Bilingualism and Language Acquisition Research is a 3 credit course designed to meet the needs of graduate students who are seeking initial licensure or a Master's degree in Curriculum and Instruction, with tracks in bilingual/multicultural education, English as a second language (ESL) instruction, or foreign language (FL) instruction. This course is required in the state of Virginia for PK-12 ESL/FL licensure and for foreign language immersion teachers.
The investigation of how humans acquire language and how language interacts with culture is essential for ESL or FL teacher candidates by assisting in the development of a knowledge base appropriate for teaching in today's multicultural world. This course emphasizes second language acquisition (SLA) research - as well as the social, cultural, affective, and cognitive factors playing a role in SLA. Students will examine available research on the cognitive and linguistic achievements of bilingual children and will acquire knowledge about the consequences of bilingualism for children's cognitive development, school achievement, and linguistic processing.
Back to top
Course Delivery:
The seminar format of EDCI 516-B01 requires the active participation of all students. As an experiential course, it is structured around discussion and small group activities. Therefore, it is critical that all students keep up with the readings and actively participate in class. Students should be prepared to discuss the content of the readings in relation to teaching culturally and linguistically diverse students in grades PK-12, as well as to ask questions for clarification, exploration, or discussion.
In order to meet the needs of varied learning styles and needs, EDCI 516-B01 uses a combination of instructional methods and technologies. These methods include: instructor-guided presentations (i.e., lectures assisted by PowerPoint or other visuals); student-guided presentations; video presentations; case studies; facilitated discussions that promote critical thinking; cooperative learning (i.e., small group structure emphasizing learning from and with others); collaborative learning (i.e., heterogeneous groups in an interdisciplinary context); and guest lectures; as well as the use of the Blackboard 5 web-based software.
Back to top
Students With Special Needs:
Students with disabilities that affect their ability to fully participate in the course or who require special accommodations are encouraged to advise the instructor in order to ensure their successful participation in this course.
Back to top
Course Outcomes:
At the conclusion of EDCI 516-B01, students will be able to demonstrate:
1. |
Understanding of first language (L1) and second language (L2) acquisition processes, research, and developmental stages, as well as their applicability to classroom instruction. |
2. |
Knowledge of various definitions and theories on bilingualism, language proficiency, and language acquisition. |
3. |
Understanding of the developmental stages of L2 acquisition. |
4. |
Ability to identify and discuss the social, cultural, affective, and cognitive factors playing a role in L2 acquisition. |
5. |
Familiarity with code-switching and language borrowing. |
6. |
Familiarity with the relationship between standard languages and dialects, and the implications of this relationship for teaching. |
7. |
Understanding the relationships among practice and second language acquisition (SLA) research and practice, methods of teaching foreign/second languages, and language assessment practices. |
8. |
Understanding of the use of technology to assist in conducting research on SLA, and its use to support learning in the SL classroom. |
Back to top
Relationship to Program Goals and Professional Organizations:
The relationship of EDCI 516-B01 to GMU-GSE program goals is as follows:
1. |
Knowledge base for teaching in the second language classroom. Students will learn the fundamental concepts pertaining to the teaching of English as a foreign language (EFL)/ English as a second language (ESL) or the teaching of other languages, such as: second language acquisition, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, pragmatics, and language pedagogy. |
2. |
Utilization of research. Students will critically evaluate theories of second language acquisition and engage in systematic investigations of the knowledge base to inform their own or others' teaching practices. |
3. |
Classroom teaching. Students will plan and manage a language learning classroom effectively, while evaluating and applying a range of teaching strategies as appropriate to their students' needs and characteristics. For this purpose, they will assess different teaching situations in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms and select appropriate teaching methodologies for students with differing learning styles and cultural backgrounds. |
4. |
Curriculum. Students will develop the skills needed to design, implement, and evaluate a second language learning program. They will conduct an analysis of culturally and linguistically diverse students' needs; set course goals and objectives; design and revise tests; select, adapt, and create appropriate teaching materials; and evaluate the program overall or at the classroom level. |
EDCI 516-B01 follows the guidelines and recommendations made by:
ACTFL and TESOL, along with NABE and NAME, are the largest professional organizations that specialize in research on working with culturally and linguistically diverse populations. They embrace and celebrate cultural and ethnic diversity as a national strength that enriches society and reject the view that diversity threatens the fabric of society. ACTFL and TESOL have the more specialized mission of developing the expertise of their members and other educators involved in teaching world languages. This mission encourages the fostering of an effective learning environment, accomplishing the goal of effective communication in diverse settings, and respecting an individual's rights and needs.
Back to top
Standards
The following standards aim to provide consistency in teacher education programs across the United States in terms of what EFL/ ESL/ FL teachers need to know and be able to do --that is, the knowledge, skills, and dispositions that are essential for the effective teaching of culturally and linguistically diverse students.
TESOL's ESL Performance-Based Standards for P-12 Teacher Education Programs
TESOL's ESL Performance-Based Standards for P-12 Teacher Education Programs serve as a bridge to the general education standards expected of all students in the United States. The National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) and the TESOL Board of Directors approved the P-12 ESL Teacher Standards in October 2001. Chaired by Lydia Stack, this 2-year project is now being prepared for publication and implementation. These standards cover the following five domains:
The standards cover five domains:
- Professionalism (i.e., understanding the nature of of L2 teaching as part of and in relation to the broader community, the broader teaching community);
- Language (i.e., an understanding of what language is and how it is used).
- Culture (i.e., understanding who ESL students are and how their communities, heritages, and goals shape their experiences in learning).,
- Instruction (i.e., what occurs in the classroom setting and how to collaborate with content-area teachers),
- Assessment (i.e., using knowledge and student performance to make decisions about future planning and instruction)..
The standards aim to provide consistency in teacher education programs across the United States in terms of what good ESL teachers need to know and be able to do -- the knowledge, skills, and dispoistions that are essential for effective teaching in particular settings. TESOL's Vision of Effective Education for All Students
TESOL's Vision of Effective Education for All Students
In addition, TESOL's vision of effective education for all students includes:
- Native-like levels of proficiency in English.
- The maintenance and promotion of ESOL students' native languages in school and community contexts.
- All educational personnel assuming responsibility for the education of ESL students.
- The availability of and access to first-rate services for ESL students.
Back to top
Course Requirements:
EDCI 516-B01 will meet face-to-face and will confer on-line (via electronic discussion list) at http://blackboard.gmu.edu/
This course requires students to:
1. |
Attend all class sessions. |
2. |
Have a working knowledge of both the Internet and e-mail. |
3. |
Complete all assignments on time. Assignments submitted past the deadline will be marked down, unless special arrangements have been made with the instructor in advance. A packet containing the specific descriptions and evaluation criteria for the course requirements is attached. |
4. |
Participate actively during large and small group discussions and activities. |
5. |
Participate in weekly discussions and assignments on Blackboard 5. Consider Blackboard 5 a FOR CREDIT electronic symposium or study group. Entries should be topical and include information from the texts for discussion points. If entries do not relate to the course, they do not receive credit. |
EDCI 516-B01- course requirements will be met as follows:
|
Project |
Goal |
Percentage of Grade |
Due Date |
Class and on-lineParticipation and Readings |
Students are expected to actively participate in every session, as well as in all e-mail discussions, by critically analyzing, asking questions, or making observations about the readings, thereby indicating that they have thoroughly prepared for the class. |
20 percent |
Every day |
Classroom Lesson Plan |
Students are expected to demonstrate the ability to create a lesson plan with a multicultural perspective on a topic from the core curriculum by integrating language, content, and culture. |
15 percent |
|
Reflective Paper |
Using traditional and on-line sources, students are expected to demonstrate an understanding of the course objectives by making written connections between the readings, class activities, and their own personal/ professional experiences. |
20 percent |
Monday,
July 1. |
Field Experience
|
In addition to the GMU class work, students are expected to spend 15 hours observing and interacting in GMU's English Language Institute (Fairfax Campus). |
15 percent |
Wednesday,
July 10. |
Field Project
|
Students are expected to record and analyze an oral language sample made by a language learner. |
30 percent |
Monday,
July 15. |
Back to top
Schedule
EDCI 516-B01
Summer 2002
Day |
Theme |
Required Readings
(Before each class) |
Assignments |
|
Course Introduction
Overview of key issues to be studied in language acquisition research. |
Fillmore, L.W. & Snow, C.E. (2000). "What Teachers Need to Know about Language" [August 23, 2000]. at
http://www.cal.org/ericcll/teachers/
|
Subscribe to The National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition & Language Instruction Educational Programs (NCELA) newsline by going to:
http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/newsline/subscribe.htm
Please a short description of your teaching philosophy in GMU's Blackboard 5 electronic forum. |
Two
Monday
June 3 |
Myths and misconceptions about second language learning. |
Baker, C. (2001). Chapters 1 & 2. Pp. 1 - 41.
Collier, V.P. (1995). Pp. 1 - 11.
McLaughlin, B. (1992), "Myths and misconceptions about second language learning ." at
http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/miscpubs/ncrcdsll/epr5.htm
Walqui, A. (2000). Strategies for Success: Engaging Immigrant Students in Secondary Schools.
http://www.cal.org/ericcll/digest/0003strategies.html
Wiley, T.G. (1997) Myths about Language Diversity and Literacy in the United States." http://www.cal.org/NCLE/Digests/Myths.htm |
Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum.
Begin to work on collaborative lesson plan by reading:
.
Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction and Sample Activities
URL: <http://www.cal.org/ericcll/digest/gallow01.html> |
Three
Wednesday
June 5
|
Language Acquisition Research: An Overview
L1 Research in Children |
Ellis, R. "Second language acquisition research: An overview." Pp.11-40
Collier, V.P. (1995). Pp. 1 - 20. |
Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum. |
Four
Monday
June 10 |
L2 Research -
Part I: Children and Second Language Acquisition |
Baker, C. (2001).Chapter 5, Pp. 85 - 109.
Wong-Fillmore, Lily (1991). Second-language learning in children: A model of language learning in social context. In Bialystok, E. (Ed.) (1991), Language Processing in Bilingual Children (pp. 49-69). New York: Cambridge University Press. |
Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum. |
Five
Wednesday
June 12 |
L2 Research
Part II: Adolescents/Adults and Second Language Acquisition |
Baker,C. (2001). Chapter 6, Pp. 109 - 133.
Hakuta, K. (1986). Chapter 6, Pp. 137-164. |
Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum. |
Six
Monday
June 17 |
Implications of Learner Similarities/Differences for the Classroom
(Sharing of language learner observations)
Input & Interaction in SLA
A Brief Look at the Multiple Intelligences & the SL Classroom |
Gardner's "Multiple Intelligences Theory: Eight Ways of Knowing." at:
http://www.multi-intell.com/ |
http://www.harding.edu/~cbr/midemo/mifirst.html |
Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum. |
Seven
Wednesday
June 19 |
Bilingualism and Intelligence |
Baker,C. (2001). Chapter 7 and 8, Pp. 134 - 180.
|
Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum. |
Eight
Monday
June 24 |
Cognitive Theories and the Curriculum |
Collier, V. P. (1995). Pp. 31 - 40.
|
Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum.
Classroom Lesson Plan due date [posted in Blackboard-5]. |
Nine
Wednesday
June 26 |
Affective, Social, and Cultural Processes |
Collier, V.P. (1995). Pp. 21 - 29. |
Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum. |
Ten
Monday
July 1 |
Bilingualism in Society |
Baker, C. (2001). Chapter 3, Pp. 42 - 66.
|
Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum.
Reflective Paper due date. |
Eleven
Wednesday
July 3 |
Politics of Bilingualism |
Baker, C. (2001). Chapter 18, Pp. 367 - 400. |
Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum. |
Twelve
Monday
July 8 |
Bilingual Education - Effectiveness and Overview of Research |
Baker, C. (2001). Chapters 11 - 13, Pp. 228 - 294. |
Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum. |
Thirteen
Wednesday
July 10 |
Bilingual Education and School Issues,
Literacy and Biliteracy. |
Baker, C. (2001). Chapters 14 - 16, Pp. 295 - 355.
|
Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum.
|Field Experience [classroom observation] report due date. |
Fourteen
Monday
July 15
Last Day
EDCI 516-B02 |
Toward a Comprehensive Theory of SLA, Implications for PK-12 schools teachers
Course Synthesis. |
Course Field Project: Students present and discuss lessons learned. oral language sample)) |
Due date: Course Field Project. |
Back to top
Required Texts:
Baker, C. (2002). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (3rd ed.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. [ISBN 1-85359-523-3].
Collier, V.P. (1995). Promoting Academic Success for ESL students: Understanding Second Language Acquisition for School. Woodside, NY: Bastos Educational Books. [ISBN 1-8835-1400-2].
Recommended Books
American Psychological Association (2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in Development. Language, Literacy, and Cognition. Cambridge: University Press.
Ellis, R. (1984).Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R., Fotos, S. et al. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. Philadelphia : J. Benjamins.
Fox, H. (1994), Listening to the World. Cultural Issues in Academic Writing. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
Hakuta, K. (1986). Mirror of language: The Debate on Bilingualism. New York : Basic Books.
Nieto, S. (2002). Language, culture, and teaching : critical perspectives for a new century. Mahwah, N.J. : L. Erlbaum.
Back to top
Classroom Lesson Plan
Due Date: Monday, June 24
Project Objectives:
Students working as members of collaborative teams will develop lesson plans based on both a specific, selected communicative language method for teaching an EFL/ ESL/ FL lesson, and a primary language subject matter lesson that is taken from the appropriate grade level curricular framework and linked to the ESL lesson objectives. This project will be posted on Blackboard 5 and presented to the class.
Project Guidelines:
For examples of communicative language methods, read "Communicative language teaching: An introduction and sample activities," which is located at:
http://www.cal.org/ericcll/digest/gallow01.html.
After selecting the communicative EFL/ ESL/ FL method, students must read two articles on the EFL/ ESL/ FL method. A brief review of each article you read must accompany a copy of the written group lesson plans to be submitted to the instructor.
Each team is to develop one EFL/ ESL/ FL lesson plan that is both age and grade appropriate and will link the subject matter of the lesson to the L2 lesson.
Team members should be prepared to discuss how the subject matter lesson is linked to the L2 lesson. Enough copies of the lesson plan (reviews of articles not included) for each member of the class must be made. Lesson plans should be comprehensive, i.e. thorough enough that class members can replicate submitted lessons in their own instructional environments.
Students will receive a group grade for the lesson plan, with all members of the group receiving the same grade. Individual grades will be given for article reviews.
Suggested Format:
How long is the class? What if they are not teaching? What should be included on the handout? How long should the article review be? What type of article should they look for?age subject matter lesson that is both age and grade appropriate and will link the subject matter of the lesson to the L2 lesson. Team members should be prepared to discuss how the subject matter lesson is linked to the L2 lesson. Enough copies of the lesson plan (reviews of articles not included) for each member of the class must be made. Lesson plans should be comprehensive, i.e. thorough enough that class members can replicate submitted lessons in their own instructional environments.
A "group grade" will be assessed for the two lesson plans, all team members receiving the same grade. Individual grades will be given for "reviews of articles".
REFLECTIVE PAPER
GUIDELINES FOR EDCI 516-B01
Last Day of Class
Project Objectives:
It is essential that PK-12 schools teachers in the field of second language education (ESL, FL, EFL) remain current on the research regarding second language acquisition in order to inform their teaching practice with the most recent methodologies. By conducting this research project and recording their findings and reflections, students will complement the course work and become more familiar with topics of particular personal/ professional interest in second language acquisition. In addition, students will become familiar with the use of both traditional and computer-based resources.
The reflective paper requires you to be critical and sophisticated consumer of research on second language acquisition. The reflective paper serves as a shortened literature review that might be done as the first step in reflecting on your own classroom practices as a teacher, or conducting a research study on a topic of interest to you. Each of the readings for this course presents a literature review, synthesizing a wide variety of studies on the topic of focus.
Your task for this reflective paper is to create your own research synthesis by critically analyzing research on your chosen topic. Through this analysis, you will become more aware of both the knowledge base to date and the limits of the research on a particular topic. No matter what the topic is, more research needs to be conducted in order to fully understand how humans acquire language.
Directions:
1 |
Choose one principle topic strand for your research. Select a topic in which you have a special interest or one with which you would like to become more familiar with. |
2 |
Review the literature on the topic you have chosen for your research. You may consider using several peer-reviewed articles or other works on theory and practice in second language acquisition. |
3 |
Each paper should include: |
|
a. |
Synthesis of key points presented in the chosen sources; |
|
b. |
Your reaction to the authors' works and implications for professional practice and your career as a teacher working at PK-12 schools; |
4. |
At the end of the article, in a separate section labeled as such, you will also include a brief Conclusions/Reflections section about your research, in which you respond to such areas as:
- How did the information from print journals and publications compare to that found on-line (via internet sources)?
- What are your conclusions? Reactions?
- What did you discover that is of personal importance to you? What are the implications for your future classroom?
|
Possible Sources:
Traditional publication sources: A minimum of TWO articles you review for this reflective paper should come from among a variety of print journals; try to include at least one article from a peer-reviewed research publication. Journals for consideration may include: TESOL Quarterly, Applied Linguistics, Studies in Second Language Acquisition Research, Bilingual Research Journal, Educational Leadership, Journal of Educational Research, Phi Delta Kappan, or others.
On-line sources: A minimum of TWO additional articles should come from sources on the Internet. Conduct a net search on the web for information relevant to your topic. Helpful sites include: http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/ or the ERIC databases (accessible from the GMU Library homepage).
Helpful Hints for Writing a Short Focus Paper:
Do not organize the focus paper around the references, by first discussing one author and in the next paragraph another author, and so forth. Instead, organize your focus paper around issues through which you can weave a number of sources together into the discussion of each issue. A useful technique is to use headings; many articles that you will read for this course are organized in this manner. Headings help the reader to identify the overall organization of your paper, and they help you as a writer to communicate what you intend to be the focus of each section. The final section of the paper will give you a chance to summarize your own reflections on research implications for classroom practices.
FYI Only: Titles of Past Reflective Papers
- A brief introduction to first language attrition
- A comprehensive look at foreign language anxiety: A new challenge for FL educators.
- Bilingual classrooms and instructional approaches to maintain bilingualism.
- Bilingual maintenance.
- Bilingualism and language impairment.
- Children growing up bilingually.
- Code-switching.
- English as a second language in Japan.
- ESL students with learning disabilities: Is there a misrepresentation?
- Finding a voice: Empowering parents of ESL students.
- How do I ensure academic success in second language learners?
- Implications of reading in the language acquisition process, specifically multicultural and bilingual literature.
- Instructional approaches in the L2 classroom.
- Language acquisition: From Pidginization to Creolization and beyond.
- Motivation and strategies for second language learning.
- Self-esteem and second language learner.
- The effectiveness of bilingual education.
- The politics of bilingual education.
- The role of comprehensible input in second language acquisition.
- Technology in the L2 classroom.
Back to top
FIELD EXPERIENCE
Due Date: Wednesday, July 10
To be completed at a GMU's English Language Institute
Project Objectives:
EDCI 516-B01 has a 15-hour field experience requirement. This means that in addition to class work, during the summer 2002 semester, each student must spend a minimum of 15 hours observing at GMU's English Language Institute.
As a result of the field experience requirement, students will:
- Gain first-hand familiarity with second language teaching roles, goals, methods, and curricula in elementary and secondary schools;
- Observe the application of second language teaching strategies and methods embodied in the classroom procedures of the cooperating teachers.
- Understand the multicultural/ multilingual dimensions and mandates of L2 environments, including addressing the learning needs of a culturally and linguistically diverse student body;
- Develop the ability to think critically about current educational issues by analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of educational approaches and practices;
- Discuss their school-based observations with each other, practicing teachers, and university instructors, comparing and contrasting teaching methods and styles at different levels and with culturally and linguistically diverse student populations.
As a requirement of the GMU Graduate School of Education, participants will engage in 15 hours of school-based field experiences. Students will engage in observations, interactions with students, and in teacher interviews in the school setting. A final written report should consist of three principle sections and be a total of 4-5 pages in length. Guidelines and suggested report format are described, as follows.
Suggested Format:
The following is the suggested format for the written report of the field observations. Iin addition to a short introduction where you briefly describe the field setting, you should include three (3) principle sections, as indicated below:
Introduction |
Brief overview of:
Classroom you observed (e.g., grade level, number students, number of teachers and teacher aides);
Teacher you observed (e.g., academic background, years of service, courses/ subjects taught, languages spoken, PK-12 schools experience). Include their teaching philosophy and how this philosophy is incorporated into their teaching methods and style. |
Part One |
Narrative Report with:
Information from Pre- and Post-Observation interviews.
Description and analysis of lessons observed. |
Part Two |
Reflexions, Conclusions. |
Attachment |
Signed Field Observation Form. |
Part One -- Narrative Report
The following guiding questions may serve to target your observation notes. Your written report should synthesize the information gleaned from your observations. You need not cover all the topics listed; they are merely guides for your observation notes:
Instructional methods: Is it lecture-based? Collaborative? Are there question and answer sessions? Hands-on activities? Worksheets? How does the teacher incorporate multiple learning styles and needs into lesson plans? What is the percentage of time devoted to the 4 skills (reading, writing, listening, speaking) and the 5th skill of thinking? How are the textbooks used during instruction? How was the lesson introduced? Presented? What instructional activities were used? How cognitively demanding were they? Were the activities context embedded or context reduced? How did the teacher connect students' prior knowledge, life experience, and interest with learning goals? |
Students: Are they focused? Are they actively participating? Is the teacher interacting with all of students? Do they understand the activity and the purpose? Are they working together well? How do they interact with the teacher? |
Classroom appearance: What is the seating arrangement (e.g., rows, tables, clusters of desks, cooperative groups)? What is on the walls of the classroom? Are the objectives posted for students? |
Classroom management: What is the daily routine? How are the daily objectives implemented? Are there a variety of activities? How does the teacher create and maintain an effective educational environment for students? |
Classroom environment: What is the effect of having multiple cultures and languages in class? What is the amount of L1 and L2 used both by students and teacher? |
Instructional Technology: Does the teacher use visuals and/or instructional technology (e.g., VCR, TV, Internet, and computer software)? Manipulatives? |
Assessment: How did the teacher assess the students' second language acquisition? |
Pre- and Post-Observation Teacher Interview:
Ask the ELI cooperating teacher to conference about one of the EFL/ ESL/ FL lessons. For your planning purposes, a pre-observation interview may last 15 - 25 minutes, but you should be mindful of the teacher's time demands; the follow-up interview should only take 5 - 10 minutes. As you prepare for the interviews, you may want to use some of the questions below as a guide.
1. |
Pre-Observation Questions: |
|
a. |
How do you think students best acquire/ learn a second language? (There are two extremes: learning rules, memorizing vocabulary, and practicing correct grammar v. focus on meaning and not language forms. Most teachers fall somewhere in between.) |
|
b. |
What are your general SLA goals for your EFL/ ESL/ FL students? What skills and knowledge do you want them to develop? Are you following a standard curriculum for ESL/FL language development that contains goals and objectives? |
|
c. |
How do you like to present new material? What types of classroom activities do you prefer? |
|
d. |
How do you see your role in class? (In terms of a continuum between teacher-centered on one end, and student-centered on the other.) |
|
e. |
How do you see the role of students? How much responsibility do you provide for and expect of your students? Do you expect the same responsibility from each one? |
|
f. |
Do your students' cultural and linguistic backgrounds affect your teaching methods? If yes, in what ways? |
2. |
In terms of the upcoming lesson: |
|
a. |
What is the objective of the lesson? |
|
b. |
What types of SLA strategies will you use with the ESL students? |
|
c. |
What types of assessment strategies will you use? |
|
d. |
What types of materials will you use? |
3. |
Post-Observation Questions: |
|
a. |
What was your impression of the lesson? |
|
b. |
Do you think the objectives were accomplished? |
|
c. |
Why or why not? |
Part II: Reflections and Conclusions:
This final section provides you with the opportunity to draw theory and practice together by reflecting on the observations, activities, and interviews. You should comment on how the information gleaned applies to second language acquisition research issues and practices we have examined and discussed in this course.
1. |
What did you like most about this particular class and/or the instructor's teaching effectiveness? |
2. |
What specific suggestions would you make to improve this particular class and/or the instructor's teaching effectiveness? |
3. |
Did you learn anything in the pre- or post-observation sessions that influenced or modified your responses? |
This section will probably be one to one and a half pages in length. One paragraph should also state how this knowledge might be applied to your current or future teaching situation.
BE SURE TO THANK THE INSTRUCTOR FOR HER/HIS TIME.
Field Experience Reporting Form
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
Graduate School of Education
Center for Multilingual/ Multicultural Education
MSN 4D1
Fairfax, VA 22030-4444
Name:
School:
Course: EDCI 516-B01
Title: Bilingualism and Language Acquisition Research
Professor: Jorge P. Osterling, Ph.D.
Clock Hours: 15
Observation Site
Class / Grade |
Teacher |
Activity Title |
Length of Activity |
Date |
Hours on site |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIELD PROJECT
Due Date: Monday, July 15
Project Objectives:
The purpose of this project is to analyze second language acquisition patterns among EFL/ ESL/ FL learners. This project is appropriate for all EDCI 516-B01 students, whether currently teaching or not. It requires no prior knowledge of linguistics for completion.
The field project component of EDCI 516-B01 is designed so that you begin to engage in active inquiry about teaching, one that requires you to think about teaching in the second language classroom (ESL/ EFL/ FL) and the students with whom you are working. It will help you develop a perspective that will contribute to your professional identity.
This project observes the following INTASC standards:
1. |
Standard 3, Diverse Learners: "The teacher understands how students differ in their approaches to learning and creates instructional opportunities that are adapted to learners from diverse cultural backgrounds and with exceptionalities." |
2. |
Standard 3.10 Knowledge: 3.13: "The teacher knows about the process of second language acquisition and about strategies to support the learning of students whose first language is not English." |
Project Guidelines:
1. |
Students will take a 4 to 10 minute audio or video language sample from an ESL/ EFL/ FL learner from any age or grade level by using sequence cards or any other activity to elicit language production. Make sure to identify the language sample. |
2. |
Students will transcribe the language sample exactly as it was spoken (verbatim). This transcription does not have to be in the International Phonetic Alphabet. |
3. |
Students will prepare a thorough analysis of language acquisition patterns based on the assessment of the language sample. In conducting your analysis you may want to review: |
|
3.1 |
Fairfax County Public School's Oral Proficiency Scoring Rubric; |
|
3.2 |
San Jose Unified School District Student Oral Language Observation Matrix (SOLOM); |
|
3.3 |
Ask NCBE No. 25: Which tests are commonly used to determine English and/or Spanishc language proficiency? |
4. |
Students will include an exploratory action plan to correct possible language difficulties. This consists of materials and activities to address language weaknesses, an assessment of the experience, and a reflection on the process and its implications for teaching. |
Suggested Format:
Part I |
Introduction |
|
Participant: Include a brief personal/ family life history of the sample participant. This may include:
- Age, place of birth, countries & cities where s/he has lived, if born overseas, age when immigrated;
- Social, educational, and personal background;
- Academic history in the US or overseas. (e.g., grade level, types of educational background);
- Linguistic, cognitive, and sociocultural competencies;
- Various learner variables that may have an effect on L2 acquisition.
|
L1 & L2 languages. Similarity or differences between both languages. Briefly reference the participant's ability in the four domains (e.g., listening, speaking, reading, and writing) and the participant's fluency level (e.g., social and academic).
Criteria to choose these informants;
Setting in which the interview was conducted.
|
Part II |
Study of the language acquisition patterns. Include the following, as appropriate: |
L1 educational foundation: Amount, level, and quality.
|
Environment (L1, L2) and expectations for learning and success. |
Communicative competency and functional proficiency. |
Individual learner differences: linguistic, cognitive, and sociocultural development. |
Phonemic acquisition: how L2 learner pronounces English/ FL words and sounds out English/ FL letters. Relationship with L1. |
BICS & CALP -- Basic interpersonal communicative skills & Cognitive academic language proficiency. Cummins (1979). |
L2: situational? Sociocultural? Academic? |
Code-switching |
ESL/ TESOL general proficiency levels:
Beginning; Intermediate; Advanced.
|
Body language (e.g., hand movements, eye coordination). |
Predictable grammatical errors (e.g., Ron Ellis, 1994). |
Filling gaps between words they do not know or remember. |
The relationship between L1 and L2: phonology, morphology, syntax.
Difficulties with syntax, grammar, and tenses. |
|
Transfer of cognitive strategies learned in L1. Applying L1 grammar rules to L2.
Is informant thinking/ processing in L1 and literally translating from L1 to L2 (e.g., L1 transference)? |
Proficiency:
- Minimal/ interrupted education at home country;
- Limited literacy in home language;
- Limited-Fair;
- Emergent- Developing
- Fair - Good
- Refining
- Good
- Approaching fluency
|
Social settings and opportunities to interact with L2/ TL speakers (Wong Fillmore). |
Examples of some common errors:
- Trouble with /th/ sound while speaking;
- Rolling /r/;
- Drop the endings (when word ends with letter /s/;
- Confusing: "from," "for," "to," and "of."
- Confusion: "an," "a," and "the."
- Confusion: "me," "my," and "I."
|
|
Part III |
Discuss your findings by linking/ relating them to the knowledge base acquired in second language acquisition theory (e.g., Baker, Bialystok, Collier, Ellis, Hakuta, Krashen, McLaughlin, Peregoy & Boyle, Snow, Walqui & West, Wong-Fillmore).
When doing so, please follow the guidelines of APA style. |
Part IV |
Conclusion(s) and application. |
|
- Describe how you would apply the results of this exercise to your classroom practice.
- Comment on what you have learned through this project.
|
References |
Follow the guidelines of APA Style. |
Back to top
Rubrics
Please use the following rubrics to assess and grade EDCI 516-B01 course assignments. Please remember that you could also lose points in formatting (APA), grammar, mechanics, spelling.
Classroom and On-Line Participation Rubric
(20% of Grade)
Criteria |
|
|
1. Student engages intensely in classroom activities or electronic discussions even when answers or solutions are not immediately
apparent. |
Not Evident |
Rarely, if ever, shows determination in the pursuit of solutions or uses strategies to keep self on track. |
Developing |
Sporadically shows determination in the pursuit of solutions and uses strategies to keep self on track. |
Proficient |
Consistently shows determination in the pursuit of solutions and uses strategies to keep self on track. |
Exemplary |
Consistently demonstrates strong determination in the pursuit of solutions, monitors his or her level of involvement, and develops and uses a number of strategies to keep self on task. |
2. Degree to which student integrates course readings into classroom
participation. |
Not Evident |
Unable to cite from readings; cannot use readings to support points; cannot articulates "fit" of readings with topic at hand. |
Developing |
Rarely able to cite from readings; rarely uses readings to support points;
rarely articulates "fit" of readings with topic at hand. |
Proficient |
Occasionally cites from readings; sometimes uses readings to support points; occasionally articulates "fit" of readings with topic at hand. |
Exemplary |
Often cites from readings; uses readings to support points; often articulates "fit" of readings with topic at hand. |
3.Interaction/participation
in classroom and on-line discussions. |
Not Evident |
Never a willing participant, never able to respond to questions; never volunteers point of view. |
Developing |
Rarely a willing participant, rarely able to respond to questions; rarely volunteers point of view. |
Proficient |
Often a willing participant, responds occasionally to questions; occasionally volunteers point of view. |
Exemplary |
Always a willing participant, responds frequently to questions;
routinely volunteers point of view. |
4. Interaction/participation
in classroom and on-line learning activities. |
Not Evident |
Never a willing participant, often acts inappropriately during role plays; etc., never able to respond to direct questions; never volunteers point of view |
Developing |
Rarely a willing participant, occasionally acts inappropriately during role
plays; etc., rarely able to respond to direct questions; rarely volunteers point of view. |
Proficient |
Often a willing participant; acts appropriately during role plays; etc., responds occasionally to questions; occasionally volunteers point of view |
Exemplary |
Always a willing participant; acts appropriately during all role plays;
etc., responds frequently to questions; routinely volunteers
point of view. |
5. Demonstration of
professional attitude and
demeanor. |
Not Evident |
Rarely prepared; often arrives late; never solicits instructors'
perspective outside class. |
Developing |
Often unprepared; occasionally arrives late; rarely solicits instructors' or colleagues perspective electronically or outside class. |
Proficient |
Rarely unprepared; rarely arrives late; occasionally solicits instructors'
or collegues' perspective electronically or outside of class. |
Exemplary |
Always demonstrates commitment through thorough preparation; always arrives on time; often solicits instructors' perspective outside class |
Reflective Paper Rubric
(20 % of Grade)
Criteria |
|
|
1. A review of theories that inform your own position. There may be any number of these, including just one if that one is comprehensive and powerful enough to cover all teaching needs. |
Not Evident |
No evidence of research. Personal experience. Is unable to critique the
findings of published research using knowledge of L2 research
and methodology. |
Developing |
Little evidence of research. Referred mostly to class or outside reading.Although critiques, summarizes, and interprets the main findings from published research, work is uneven and readers gain few insights. |
Proficient |
Critiques, summarizes, and interprets the main
findings from published research. Some evidence of research integrated into the reflective paper. |
Exemplary |
Insightfully and completely critiques, summarizes, and interprets the findings from published research.Used wide variety of resources and quotes. Brought in new resources --all relates to the topic.
Evidence of scientific research integrated throughout reflective paper. |
2. A statement of your own theoretical framework drawn from these theories and other sources, such as experience and observation. |
Not Evident |
Very little or very weak attempt to relate evidence to argument; may be no
identifiable argument, or no evidence to relate it to. |
Developing |
Quotes appear often without analysis relating them to mini-thesis (or there is a weak mini-thesis to support), or analysis offers nothing beyond the quote. |
Proficient |
Evidence often related to mini-thesis, though links perhaps not very clear. |
Exemplary |
Clearly relates evidence to "mini-thesis" (topic sentence); analysis is fresh and exciting, posing new ways to think of the material. |
3. A reflection on how this theoretical framework will be applied and will affect your professional work as an L2 teacher. |
Not Evident |
Does not apply knowledge to teaching situations at PK-12 schools. |
Developing |
Minimal application of knowledge to teaching situations at PK-12 schools. |
Proficient |
Some knowledge application to teaching situations at PK-12 schools. |
Exemplary |
Applies knowledge to teaching situations at PK-12 schools. |
4. Contributions
of research to education,
knowledge, and practice. |
Not Evident |
Cannot articulate the contributions of L1 & L2 research to education, knowledge, and practice. Missing conclusion. |
Developing |
Can discuss some contributions of L1 & L2 research to education, knowledge, and practice, but explanations are not comprehensive.Weak conclusion. |
Proficient |
Explains the major contributions of L1 & L2 research to education, knowledge, and practice. Adequate conclusion. |
Exemplary |
Articulates the contributions of L1 & L2 research to education, knowledge, and practice. Effective conclusion. |
5. Presentation and APA Format |
Not Evident |
Few or no APA formatting requirements are met (e.g., title page, abstract, page numbers, double-space). Report is messy and hard to follow. Poor grammar and spelling significantly reduce the readability of the report. |
Developing |
Some formatting requirements are followed some of the time. The
layout used is clumsy. There may be a significant number of misspelled words or poorly constructed sentences. However, the gist of the report can still be determined despite these technical writing difficulties. |
Proficient |
Most of the formatting requirements are met fairly consistently. The
layout used is easy to read and follow. Grammar and spelling
used is basically correct. There are only a few misspelled words or awkward sentences. |
Exemplary |
All required sections are present and in correct order. Paper is typed, font size and type requirements are met. Layout conventions are used and followed consistently. Report is easy to read and follow. All sentences are grammatically correct. All spelling is correct. |
Course Field Project Rubric
(30 % of Grade)
1. Recorded and analysed a 4 - 10 minute audio language sample from an ESL/ EFL/ FL learner [any age or grade level].
|
Not Evident |
Did not tape (audio/ video) nor transcribe L2 language sample as described in guidelines. |
Developing |
Taped (audio/ video) and transcribed L2 language sample but not as described in guidelines. |
Proficient |
Taped (audio/ video) and transcribed L2 language sample as described in guidelines. |
Exemplary |
Taped (audio/ video) and transcribed L2 language sample as described in guidelines. |
2. Analyzed second language acquisition patterns among EFL/ ES/ FL learners. |
Not Evident |
No analysis or reflection included. Opinion. No support. Superficial assumptions. |
Developing |
Analysis and reflection does not adequately/ throughfuly address the areas studies. |
Proficient |
Analysis and reflection throughly addressed most areas. Reflects on class themes or cites references. |
Exemplary |
Analysis and reflection throughly addressed areas covered in course content. Deeper explanations with support from sources and class themes. |
3. Language. |
Not Evident |
No professional or incorrect language. |
Developing |
Sporadic use of professional vocabulary. |
Proficient |
Some professional vocabulary. |
Exemplary |
Professional vocabulary, phrasing, and tone. |
4. Context. Brief personal/ family life history of sample participant. |
Not Evident |
Limited factual data. |
Developing |
Sporadic use of factual data. |
Proficient |
Case evidence used to make point. Limited connection. |
Exemplary |
Multiple context. Rich. Concise. |
5. Presentation and APA Format. |
Not Evident |
Few or no APA formatting requirements are met (e.g., title page, abstract, page numbers, double-space). Report is is messy and hard to follow. Poor grammar and spelling significantly reduce the readability of the report. |
Developing |
Some formatting requirements are followed some of the time. The
layout used is clumsy. There may be a significant number of misspelled words or poorly constructed sentences. However, the gist of the report can still be determined despite these technical writing difficulties. |
Proficient |
Most of the formatting requirements are met fairly consistently. The
layout used is easy to read and follow. Grammar and spelling
used is basically correct. There are only a few misspelled words or awkward sentences. |
Exemplary |
All required sections are present and in correct order. Paper is typed, font size and type requirements are met. Layout conventions are used and followed consistently. Report is easy to read and follow.
All sentences are grammatically correct. All spelling is correct. |
Classroom Lesson Rubric
(15 % of grade)
Criteria |
© ED's Oasis
http://www.classroom.com/ edsoasis/TGuild/MsRubric.html
*Permission to copy or reprint this rubric is granted only if the copyright notice is included. Any use of these materials for commercial gain is prohibited. |
1. Curriculum and Standards
[e.g, LEA, state or national].
|
Not Evident |
No connection. |
Developing |
Some connections to core curriculum with few references to a course of study and to curriculum standards. |
Proficient |
Connections to core curriculum with clear references to a course of study and curriculum standards. |
Exemplary |
Supports core curricum content and appropriate to the targeted student
population; Well integrated with course of study and with curriculum standards. |
2. Student-Centerdness. |
Not Evident |
Lesson flat and uninspiring; Students not engaged. |
Developing |
Appealing lesson;
Student choice and fexibility are limited. |
Proficient |
Appealing lesson; Evidence of instructional flexibility or accommodation of students' interests. |
Exemplary |
Appealing lesson; Invites students to be creative; Supports students choice; Encourages students to take responsibility for learning. |
3. Collaborative Learning. |
Not Evident |
Neither students nor teachers work as teams or
partners. |
Developing |
One of following is true:
1. A team of teachers shares some responsibility for the design and implementation of the project;
2. Teams of students worked together on at least part of the session. |
Proficient |
One of the following is true:
1. Unit is clearly a joint effort of a team of teachers;
2. Students are rewquired to work in teams for most of the project;
3. Classes depend on gathering data or input from geographically distant partners. |
Exemplary |
Two of the following are true:
1. Unit is clearly a joint effort of a team of teachers;
2. Students are rewquired to work in teams for most of the project;
3. Classes depend on gathering data or input from geographically distant partners. |
4. Teacher's Role. |
Not Evident |
Lesson does not define teacher's role. |
Developing |
Lesson alludes to the teacher's role either through general tips; or the
teacher's role is implicit in the lesson description. |
Proficient |
Lesson describes the teacher's specific activities and how s/he is
to support student learning. |
Exemplary |
Lesson describes the teacher's specific activities and how s/he is to support and assess student learning. Lesson identifies potential challenges inherent to the lesson and suggests alternative instructional strategies. |
5. Instructional Design. |
Not Evident |
Incomplete or sketchy lesson. |
Developing |
Lesson is complete, but lacks depth. Lesson does not offer strategies for adaptations to diverse learning syles or student populations with
special needs (e.g., culturally and linguistically diverse, students with/out
disabilities). |
Proficient |
Lesson is complete and goes into depth. Lacks specific examples of adaptations to diverse learning syles or student populations with special
needs (e.g., culturally and linguistically diverse, students with/out disabilities). |
Exemplary |
Lesson is complete, deep, and adaptable. Offers extensions for more motivated learners and/or adaptations for students with special needs or
learning style preferences. |
6. Educational Objectives/
Performance-based
Assessment Strategies. |
Not Evident |
No evidence of connection between instructional objectives nor assessment strategies. |
Developing |
Some mention of educational objectives; Inadequate or incomplete references to assessments. |
Proficient |
Adequate identification of educational objectives and performance-based assessment strategies. |
Exemplary |
Educational objectives are clear, obtainable, and measurable.
Multiple and alternative perfformance-based assessment strategies are
used.. |
7. Ease of Use. |
Not Evident |
Several potential flaws:
-Demanding time frame;
-Too limited;
-Too expensive; |
Developing |
Scope of lesson is challenging. Uses some materials or strategies which are not typically available or manageable. |
Proficient |
Scope of the lesson appears to be manageable in a typical classroom of the targeted grade level and subject. BUT, has not been tested and used with students. |
Exemplary |
Scope of the lesson is manageable in a typical classroom of the targeted
grade level and subject. Lesson has been tested and used with students,
and the teacher has provided reflective comments about her/ his experiences. |
8. Instructional Technology. |
Not Evident |
Treats students as passive recipients of information; Not well designed. Trivial use of mediums. |
Developing |
Use of Internet is focused, and may originate from a teacher-designed web site. |
Proficient |
Lesson's use of the Internet helps students achieve their learning objectives by involving them actively in at least one of the following ways: Searching for information; Communicating with peers or experts. |
Exemplary |
Adequate and appropriate use of various types of instructional technology [e.g., VCR, TV, Internet access, interactive science projects,& multiple software including word processing and Inspiration].
Lesson's use of the Internet helps students achieve their learning objectives by involving them actively in: Searching for information; Communicating with peers or experts; Synthesizing their nformation and/ or data into a presentation that is published on line. |
Field Experience/ Observation and Report Rubric
(15% of grade)
Criteria |
|
15-Clock Hours Observing EFL/ ESL/ FL classes |
1. Student spent a minimum of 15 hours preparing, observing and participating at ESL classes at GMU's English Language Institute. |
Not Evident |
Missing more than 8 observation hours, as required by GMU-GSE. |
Developing |
Missing 5-to-8 classroom observation hours, as required by GMU-GSE. |
Proficient |
Missing 1-4 classroom observation hours, as required by GMU-GSE. |
Exemplary |
Carefully planned, and chosen field experience opportunity. Observation hours completed, as required by GMU-GSE. Voluntarily assisted cooperating teacher in classroom. |
2. School and class observed (e.g., location, demographics, ambiance, culture, physical environment, socioeconomic issues). |
Not Evident |
Minimal factual data. Does not describe or analyze school & classroom culture/ physical environment.
Superficial overview of context or environment in which school/ classroom are located. |
Developing |
Limited factual data, and limited description of school & classroom culture/ physical environment. |
Proficient |
Some factual data, and description fo school & classroom cultura/ physical environment. |
Exemplary |
Educational facility: briefly describes programmatic, functional, spatial, and environmental characteristics of both the school and classroom.
School & classroom culture: analyzes the attitudes and beliefs of persons both inside the school and in the external environment, the cultural norms of the school, and the relationships between persons in the school/ classroom and its impact or influence in creating an authentic learning environment. |
3. Cooperating Teacher. |
Not Evident |
Cooperating teacher not interviewed (e.g., pre- and post-observation interviews). Profile of cooperating teacher(s) neither addressed nor included. |
Developing |
Sporadic information on cooperating teacher. |
Proficient |
Some evidence used to make point. Limited connection. |
Exemplary |
Careful and thoughtful interview of cooperativing teacher. Included her/his profile (e.g., teaching philosophy, academic background, years of service, courses/ subjects taught, languages spoken, international experience).
Conducted several pre- and post-observation interviews. |
4. Lesson(s) Observed.
5. Report. |
Not Evident |
Quietly sat in the back of the classroom. Did not participate nor get involved in the classroom. |
Developing |
Did not participate nor get involved in observed classroom. Superficial discussion of teaching syle and student involvement. |
Proficient |
Attaches and briefly analyzes/ comments/ discusses lesson plan.
Limited analysis of teaching syle and student involvement/ participation. |
Exemplary |
Lesson plan attached and discussed: Includes: (a) Summary of lesson plan; (b) Objectives & Implementation; (c) Activities involved; (d) Materials used; (e) Teaching styles; (e) SLA strategies used; (f) Assessment.
Addresses degree to which teacher employs direct instruction.
Includes analysis of student involvement/ participation. |
Not Evident |
No reflections on classroom observations and activities;
Does not apply knowledge/ experience to future teaching;
Does not use professional literature. |
Developing |
Does not provide requested comments or reflection on observed lessons or classroom environment; Very limited application of knowledge/ experience to future teaching. |
Proficient |
Does not comment or reflect on all areas of the observed classroom/ lesson/ student observed or does not reflect with depth; Knowledge applied minimally to teaching at PK-12 schools; Limited use of professional literature to support analysis. |
Exemplary |
Discussed strengths and weaknesses of the teacher(s) interviewed and lesson(s) observed.
Thoughful comments and reflection on observed classroom/ lesson/ students observed; Applied knowledge to teaching L2 at PK-12 schools; Extensive use of professional literature to support analysis. |
6. Presentation and APA Format |
Not Evident |
Few or no APA formatting requirements are met (e.g., title page, abstract, page numbers, double-space). Report is is messy and hard to follow. Poor grammar and spelling significantly reduce the readability of the report. |
Developing |
Some formatting requirements are followed some of the time. The
layout used is clumsy. There may be a significant number of misspelled words or poorly constructed sentences. However, the gist of the report can still be determined despite these technical writing difficulties. |
Proficient |
Most of the formatting requirements are met fairly consistently. The
layout used is easy to read and follow. Grammar and spelling
used is basically correct. There are only a few misspelled words or awkward sentences. |
Exemplary |
All required sections are present and in correct order. Paper is typed, font size and type requirements are met. Layout conventions are used and followed consistently. Report is easy to read and follow.
All sentences are grammatically correct. All spelling is correct. |
Back to top
|