College of Education and Human Development

A-Robinson Hall
Suite A-323

4400 University Drive
Fairfax, VA 22030-4444
(voice) (703) 993-8136
(fax) 703 ) 993-3336

josterli@gmu.edu

Summer 2002

George Mason University
College of Education and Human Development

EDCI 516-601
BILINGUALISM AND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION RESEARCH
Summer 2002 [Intensive]

Instructor: Jorge P. Osterling, Ph.D.
Class Day and Time: M-F 8:30 a.m. - 3:30 p.m.
  June 24 - July 3, 2002
Class Location: West 261
Contact Information::  
   
Office: A-Robinson, 451-B
Center for Multilingual/ Multicultural Education
E-Mail: josterli@gmu.edu
Office Hours: By appointment during FAST TRAIN summer session
Profile: http://cehd.gmu.edu//profiles/josterlin.htm
Telephone: (703) 993-8136
Fax: (703) 993-3336


COURSE OUTLINE

Course Description Course Requirements:
Course Delivery
Students with Special Needs Field Project: Recording and analysis of an oral language sample
Course Outcomes
Relationship to Program Goals and Professional Organizations Reflective Paper:

Standards

PASCA Methodology Field Experience: 15-hour field experience requirement.
Required Texts  
Recommended APA Publications Manual

Rubrics:


Back to top


Course Description:

EDCI 516-601Examines research in first and second language acquisition, including the interaction of a bilingual person's two languages, with implications for the classroom.

Back to top


Course Delivery:

The seminar format of EDCI 516-601 requires the active participation of all students. As an experiential course, it is structured around discussion and small group activities. Therefore, it is critical that all students keep up with the readings and actively participate in class. Students should be prepared to discuss the content of the readings in relation to teaching culturally and linguistically diverse students in grades PK-12, as well as to ask questions for clarification, exploration, or discussion.


In order to meet the needs of varied learning styles and needs, EDCI 516-601 uses a combination of instructional methods and technologies. These methods include: instructor-guided presentations (i.e., lectures assisted by PowerPoint or other visuals); student-guided presentations; video presentations; case studies; facilitated discussions that promote critical thinking; cooperative learning (i.e., small group structure emphasizing learning from and with others); collaborative learning (i.e., heterogeneous groups in an interdisciplinary context); and guest lectures; as well as the use of the Blackboard 5 web-based software.

Back to top


Students With Special Needs:

Students with disabilities that affect their ability to fully participate in the course or who require special accommodations are encouraged to advise the instructor in order to ensure their successful participation in this course.

Back to top


Course Outcomes:

At the conclusion of EDCI 516-601, students will be able to demonstrate:

1. Understanding of first language (L1) and second language (L2) acquisition processes, research, and developmental stages, as well as their applicability to classroom instruction.
2. Knowledge of various definitions and theories on bilingualism, language proficiency, and language acquisition.
3. Understanding of the developmental stages of L2 acquisition.
4. Ability to identify and discuss the social, cultural, affective, and cognitive factors playing a role in L2 acquisition.
5. Familiarity with code-switching, language borrowing.
6. Familiarity with the relationship between standard languages and dialects, and the implications of this relationship during instruction.
7. Understanding the relationships among second language acquisition (SLA) research and practice, methods of teaching second/ foreign languages, and language assessment practices.
8. Understanding of the use of technology to assist in conducting research on SLA, as well as its use to support learning in the SL classroom.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Back to top


Relationship to Program Goals and Professional Organizations:

The relationship of EDCI 516-601 to GMU-GSE program goals includes the following:

1. Knowledge base for teaching in the second language classroom. Learn the fundamental concepts of the knowledge base pertaining to English as a foreign language (EFL) / English as a second language (ESL), the teaching of other second and foreign languages, second language acquisition, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, pragmatics, and language pedagogy.
2. Utilization of research. EDCI 516-601 students should be able to understand and critically evaluate second language learning theories and engage in systematic investigation of the knowledge base to inform their own or others' teaching practices.
3. Classroom teaching. EDCI 516-601 students should be able to plan and manage a second language class effectively and be able to evaluate and selectively apply a range of teaching strategies as appropriate to their students' needs and characteristics. For this purpose, they will need to be able to assess different teaching situations and changing conditions in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms, so as to select appropriate teaching procedures and adapt to teaching students with differing learning styles and cultural backgrounds.
4. Curriculum. Students will develop the skills needed to design, implement, and evaluate a second language-teaching program. They will be able to conduct an analysis of culturally and linguistically diverse students' needs; set course goals and objectives; design and revise tests; select, adapt, and create appropriate teaching materials; and evaluate the program overall or at the classroom level.

EDCI 516-601 follows the guidelines and recommendations made by the:

Teachers of English for Speakers of Other Languages TESOL
The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages ACTFL
The National Association for Bilingual Education NABE
The National Association for Multicultural Education NAME

 

 

 

Back to top


Standards

The following standards aim to provide consistency in teacher education programs across the United States in terms of what ESL teachers need to know and be able to do - that is, the knowledge, skills, and dispositions that are essential for the effective teaching of culturally and linguistically diverse students.

INTASC standards
INTASC standards for teacher licensure represent those principles that should be present in all teaching environments, regardless of the subject or grade level, and serve as a framework for the systemic reform of teacher preparation and professional development programs.

TESOL's ESL Performance-Based Standards for P-12 Teacher Education Programs serve as a bridge to the general education standards expected of all students in the United States. The National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) and the TESOL Board of Directors approved the P-12 ESL Teacher Standards in October 2001. This 2-year project, chaired by Lydia Stack, this 2-year project is now being prepared for publication and implementation. The standards cover five domains:

  1. Professionalism (i.e., understanding the nature of of L2 teaching as part of and in relation to the broader community, the broader teaching community.
  2. Language (i.e., an understanding of what language is and how it is used).
  3. Culture (i.e., understanding who ESL students are and how their communities, heritages, and goals shape learning and their experiences in learning).,
  4. Instruction (i.e., understanding what occurs in the classroom setting and how to collaborate with with content-area teachers),
  5. Assessment (i.e., using knowledge and student performance to make decisions about future planning and instruction).

TESOL's Vision of Effective Education for All Students

In addition, TESOL's vision of effective education for all students includes:

  • Native-like levels of proficiency in English.
  • The maintenance and promotion of ESL students' native languages in school and community contexts.
  • All educational personnel assume responsibility for the education of ESL students.

The availability and access to first-rate services for ESL students. Effective education also calls for comprehensive provision of first-rate services and full access to those services by all students.

Back to top


Course Requirements:

EDCI 516-601 will meet face-to-face and will confer on-line (via electronic discussion list) at http://blackboard.gmu.edu/

EDCI 516-601 requires to:

1. Attend all class sessions.
2. Have a working knowledge of both the Internet and e-mail.
3. Complete all assignments on time. Assignments submitted past the deadline will be marked down, unless special arrangements have been made with the instructor in advance. A package containing the specific descriptions and evaluation criteria for the course requirements is attached.
4. Participate actively during large and small group discussions and activities.
5. Participate in discussions and assigments on Blackboard 5. Consider Blackboard 5 a FOR CREDITelectronic symposium or study group. Entries should be topical and include information from the texts for discussion points. If entries do not relate to the course, they do not receive credit.

EDCI 516-601-FAST TRAIN course requirements will be met as follows:

Project
Goal
Percentage of Grade
Due Date
Class and On-line Participation and Readings Students are expected to actively participate in every session, as well as in all e-mail discussions, by critically analyzing, asking questions, or making observations or comments about the readings, thereby indicating that they have thoroughly prepared for the class.
20 percent
Every day
Field Project
Students are expected to record and analyze an oral language sample made by a language learner. 30 percent Seventh session
Classroom Lesson Plan Students are expected to demonstrate the ability to create a lesson plan with a multicultural perspective on a topic from the core curriculum by integrating language, content, and culture. 15 percent Last day of class

Reflective Paper

Using traditional and on-line research sources, students are expected to demonstrate an understanding of the course objectives and outcomes by making written connections between the readings, class activities, and their own personal/ professional experiences. 20 percent Last day of class.

Field Experience

In addition to the GMU class work, students, students are expected to spend 15 hours observing and interacting with EFL/ ESL/ FL master teachers at an international school after the conclusion of the course meetings. 15 percent When completed

Back to top

Schedule

EDCI 516-601-FAST TRAIN
Summer 2002

Day
Theme
Required Readings
Assignments

One

Monday, June 24

Course Introduction

Overview of key issues to be studied in language acquisition research.

Myths and misconceptions about second language learning.

Semantic issues: definitions of bilingualism, bilingual education.

Linguisitc Video: Discovering Human Language, 55 min. Interviewees: Noam Chomsky, Frederick Newmeyer, Lila Gleitman, George A. Miller,
Lewis Thomas [et al.]
(1995).

Baker, Chapters 1
Collier, Pp. 1 - 11
McLaughlin, B.(1992), "Myths and misconceptions about second language learning ." at:
http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/miscpubs/ncrcdsll/epr5.htm
Walqui, A. (2000). "Strategies for Success: Engaging Immigrant Students in Secondary Schools." at:
http://www.cal.org/ericcll/digest/0003strategies.html

Wiley, T.G. (1997) Myths about Language Diversity and Literacy in the United States." at: http://www.cal.org/NCLE/Digests/Myths.htm

Subscribe to The National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs (NCELA) newsline by going to:
http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/newsline/subscribe.htm

Please post a short description of your teaching philosophy in GMU's Blackboard 5 electronic discussion forum.

Please comment on today's video, particularly in the Chomskian
revolution.

Two

Tuesday, June 25

Language Acquisition Research: An Overview

L1 Research in Children

L2 Research - part I: Children and Second Language Acquisition

Educational Video: Fear and Learning at Hoover Elementary, 53 min. (1996).

Ellis, R."Second language acquisition research: An overview." Pp.11-40.

Collier, p. 5 and pp. 12 - 19.

Baker, Chapter 5

Wong-Fillmore, Lily (1991). Second-language learning in children: A model of language learning in social context. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language Processes in Bilingual Children (pp. 49-69). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum.

Three

Wednesday, June 26

L2 Research, part II: Adolescents/Adults and Second Language Acquisition

Implications of Learner Similarities/Differences for the Classroom
(Sharing of language learner observations)

Input and Interaction in SLA: A brief look at the Multiple Intelligences and the SL Classroom

Baker, Chapter 7, 8, and 14
Hakuta, Chapter 6 (Pp. 137-164)

Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum.

Four

Thursday, June 27

Bilingualism and Intelligence

Cognitive Theories and the Curriculum

Collier, pp. 31 - 39 Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum.

Five

Friday,
June 28

Affective, Social and Cultural Processes

Bilingualism in society

Baker, Chapter 12, 18
Collier, pp. 21 - 29

Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum.
Weekend

Six

Monday,
July 1

Politics of bilingualism Baker, Chapter 19 and 20 Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum.

Seven

Tuesday, July 2

Bilingual education - effectiveness and overview of research

Bilingual education and school issues, literacy and biliteracy.

Baker Chapters 14, 15,16. 19, and 20.

Participate in GMU's Blackboard-5 electronic discussion forum.

Field Project due.

Eight

Wednesday, July 3

Toward a comprehensive theory of SLA.
Implications for International teachers
Course Synthesis and

Last Day of EDCI 516-601

Classroom lesson plan due.

Reflective paper due.


Back to top

 

Required Texts:

Baker, C. (2002). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (3rd ed.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Collier, V.P. (1995). Promoting academic success for ESL students: Understanding second language acquisition for school. Woodside, NY: Bastos Educational Books.

Recommended Manual:

American Psychological Association (2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

All papers and professional writing in the GMU's College of Education and Human Development should follow the APA Style Manual.

Back to top



PASCA Methodology

Process Phase
Participants

Presentation

Instructor or student describes a body of information to all participating students.

  • Take notes;
  • Listen;
  • Reflect;
  • Raise Questions .

Analysis

Student groups (4 or 5 colleagues) explore the content of the participation.

  • Connect ideas in presentation to personal and professional experience particularly in overseas schools;
  • Clarify content;
  • Check understanding;
  • Elaborate, expand, and extend content;
  • Identify additional question.

Strolling Critique

Weather permitting, groups of 2 to 5 students take a walk and talk about the day's material.

  • Further explore concepts, ideas, and questions;
  • Express opinions/ feelings;
  • Discover challenges/ dilemmas/ problems;
  • Identify additional questions;
  • Write in journals.

Collaborative Argument
Plenary session
Discussion of the investigation/ inquiry/ probes of the day's work.

  • Explore perspectives;
  • Evaluate concepts and ideas;
  • Suggest changes;
  • Build theory;
  • Develop dialogic framework to probe issue(s) embedded in the day's work;
  • Describe emerging plan of action.

Back to top



FIELD PROJECT

Date Due: Seventh Session

Project Objectives:

The purpose of this project is to analyze second language acquisition patterns among EFL/ ESL/ FL learners. This project is appropriate for all EDCI 516-601 students, whether currently teaching or not. It requires no prior knowledge of linguistics.

The field project component of EDCI 516-601 is designed so that you begin to engage in active inquiry about teaching, one that requires you to think about teaching in the second language classroom (ESL/ EFL/ FL) and the students with whom you are working. It will help you develop a perspective that will contribute to your professional identity.

This project observes the following INTASC standards:

Standard 3, Diverse Learners
"The teacher understands how students differ in their approaches to learning and creates instructional opportunities that are adapted to learners from diverse cultural backgrounds and with exceptionalities."

Standard 3.10 Knowledge: 3.13
"The teacher knows about the process of second language acquisition and about strategies to support the learning of students whose first language is not English."


Project Guidelines

  1. Students will take a 4 to 10 minutes audio language sample from an ESL/ EFL/ FL learner from any age or grade level by using sequence cards or any other activity to elicit language production. Make sure to identify the language sample.
  2. Students will transcribe the language sample exactly as it was spoken (verbatim). This transcription does not have to be in the International Phonetic Alphabet.
  3. Students will prepare a thorough analysis of language acquistion patterns based on the assessment of the language sample. In conducting your analysis you may want to review:
    1. Fairfax County Public School's Oral Proficiency Scoring Rubric;
    2. San Jose Unified School District Student Oral Language Observation Matrix (SOLOM);
    3. Ask NCBE No. 25: Which tests are commonly used to determine English and/or Spanishc language proficiency?
  4. Students will include an exploratory action plan to correct possible language difficulties. This consists of materials and activities to address for language weaknesses, an assessment of the experience, and a reflection on the process and its implications for teaching.


Suggested Format:

Part I Introduction
  Participant. Include a brief personal/ family life history of the sample participant. This may include:
  • Age, place of birth, countries and cities where s/he has lived, if born overseas, age when immigrated;
  • Social, educational, and personal background;
  • Academic history in the US or overseas. (e.g., grade level, type of educational background);
  • Linguistic, cognitive, and sociocultural competencies.
  • Various learner variables that may have an effect on L2 acquisition

L1 and L2 languages. Discuss the similarities or differences between both languages. Brief reference to the four domains (e.g., listening, speaking, reading, and writing) and the participant's fluency level (e.g., social and academic).

Criteria for choosing the participant;
Setting in which the interview was conducted.

Part II Study of the language acquisition patterns. Include the following, as appropriate:
L1 educational foundation: amount, level, and quality.
Environment (L1, L2) and expectations for learning and success.
Communicative competency and functional proficiency. Individual learner differences: linguistic, cognitive, and sociocultural development.
Phonemic acquisition: how L2 learner pronounces English/ FL words and sounds out English/ FL letters. Relationship with L1. BICS and CALP -- Basic interpersonal communicative skills and Cognitive academic language proficiency. Cummins (1979).
L2: situational? Sociocultural? Academic?
Code-switching
ESL/ TESOL general proficiency levels:
Beginning; Intermediate; Advanced.
Body language (e.g., hand movements, eye coordination).
Predictable grammatical errors … stage of L2 acquisition (e.g., Ron Ellis, 1994). Filling gaps between words they do not know or remember.

The relationship between L1 and L2: phonology, morphology, syntax.
Difficulties with syntax, grammar, and tenses.
Transfer of cognitive strategies learned in L1. Applying L1 grammar rules to L2. Is informant thinking/ processing in L1 and literally translating from L1 to L2 (ee.g., L1 transference)?

Examples of some common errors:
- Trouble with /th/ sound while speaking;
- Rolling /r/;
- Drop the endings (when word ends with letter /s/;
- Confusing: "from," "for," "to," and "of."
- Confusion: "an," "a," and "the."
- Confusion: "me," "my," and "I."

Social settings and opportunities to interact with L2/ TL speakers (Wong Fillmore). Level of self-awareness: L2 strengths and weaknesses.
   
Part III

Discuss your findings by relating them to second language acquisition theory (e.g., Baker, Bialystok, Collier, Ellis, Hakuta, Krashen, McLaughlin, Peregoy and Boyle, Snow, Walqui and West, Wong-Fillmore).
When doing so, please follow the guidelines of APA style.

Part IV Conclusion(s) and application.
 
  1. Describe how you would apply the results of this exercise to your classroom practice.
  2. Comment on what you have learned through this project.
References Follow the guidelines of APA Style.

Back to top



Classroom Lesson Plan
Due Date: Last Day of Class

Project Objectives:

Students working as members of collaborative teams will develop lesson plans based on both a specific, selected communicative language method for teaching an EFL/ ESL/ FL lesson, and a primary language subject matter lesson that is taken from the appropriate grade level curricular framework and linked to the ESL lesson objectives. This project will be posted on Blackboard 5 and presented to the class.

Project Guidelines:

For examples of communicative language methods, read "Communicative language teaching: An introduction and sample activities," which is located at:

http://www.cal.org/ericcll/digest/gallow01.html.

After selecting the communicative EFL/ ESL/ FL method, students must read two articles on the EFL/ ESL/ FL method. A brief review of each article you read must accompany a copy of the written group lesson plans to be submitted to the instructor.

Each team is to develop one EFL/ ESL/ FL lesson plan that is both age and grade appropriate and will link the subject matter of the lesson to the L2 lesson.

Team members should be prepared to discuss how the subject matter lesson is linked to the L2 lesson. Enough copies of the lesson plan (reviews of articles not included) for each member of the class must be made. Lesson plans should be comprehensive, i.e. thorough enough that class members can replicate submitted lessons in their own instructional environments.

Students will receive a group grade for the lesson plan, with all members of the group receiving the same grade. Individual grades will be given for article reviews.

Suggested Format:

How long is the class? What if they are not teaching? What should be included on the handout? How long should the article review be? What type of article should they look for?age subject matter lesson that is both age and grade appropriate and will link the subject matter of the lesson to the L2 lesson. Team members should be prepared to discuss how the subject matter lesson is linked to the L2 lesson. Enough copies of the lesson plan (reviews of articles not included) for each member of the class must be made. Lesson plans should be comprehensive, i.e. thorough enough that class members can replicate submitted lessons in their own instructional environments.

A "group grade" will be assessed for the two lesson plans, all team members receiving the same grade. Individual grades will be given for "reviews of articles".

Back to top



REFLECTIVE PAPER

GUIDELINES FOR EDCI 516-601
Last Day of Class

Project Context and Goals:

It is essential that international teachers in the field of second language education (ESL, FL, EFL) remain current on the research regarding second language acquisition in order to inform their teaching practice with the most recent methodologies. By conducting this research project and recording their findings and reflections, students will complement the course work and become more familiar with topics of particular personal/ professional interest in second language acquisition. Students will become familiar with the use of both traditional and computer-based resources.

EDCI 516-601 Reflective Paper:

The focus paper for this course is designed to help you to be a critical and sophisticated consumer of research on second language acquisition. A focus paper is a shortened literature review that might be done as the first step in reflecting on your own classroom practices as a teacher, or conducting a research study, on a topic of interest to you. Each of the readings for this course presents a literature review, synthesizing a wide variety of studies on the topic of focus.

Your task for the short focus paper is to create your own research synthesis, by critically analyzing the sources that you have read on the topic. Through this analysis of some of the research on a given topic, you will become more aware of both the knowledge base to date and the limits of the research on that topic. You will include reflections on possible implications of the research for your own classroom. No matter what the topic is, much more research needs to be conducted in order to understand how we humans acquire language. This paper will provide experience with what is expected in good academic writing at the graduate level. The short focus paper should be approximately 8 - 12 pages, word-processed, double-spaced and follow APA Style (See below). A bibliography in APA Style is an integral part of the EDCI 516-601 reflective paper, as it is for all work submitted in the Graduate School of Education.

Directions:

1 Choose one principle topic strand for your research. Select a topic in which you have a special interest or one with which you would like to become more familiar.
2 Review the literature on the topic you have chosen for your research. You may consider using several peer-reviewed articles or other works on theory and practice in second language acquisition.
3 Each paper should include:
  a. Synthesis of key points of the articles;
  b. Your reaction to the authors' works and implications for professional practice and your career as a teacher working at international schools;
  c. Sources chosen according to the explanation below;
  d. Sources chosen according to the explanation below;
4.

At the end of the article, in a separate section labeled as such, you will also include a brief Conclusions/Reflections section about your research, in which you respond to such areas as:

  • How did the information from print journals and publications compare to that found on-line (via internet sources)?
  • What are your conclusions? Reactions?
  • What did you discover that is of personal importance to you? What are the implications for your future classroom?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOURCES:

Traditional publication sources:

A minimum of TWO articles you review for this reflective paper should come from among a variety of print journals; try to include at least one article from a peer-reviewed research publication.

Journals for consideration may include: TESOL Quarterly, Applied Linguistics, Studies in Second Language Acquisition Research, Bilingual Research Journal, Educational Leadership, AERA, Journal of Educational Research, Phi Delta Kappan, or others.

On-line sources:

A minimum of TWO additional articles should come from sources on the Internet. Conduct a net search on the web for information relevant to your topic.

Helpful sites include: http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/ or the ERIC databases (accessible from the GMU Library homepage).

Helpful Hints for Writing a Short Focus Paper:

Organize your thoughts carefully before starting to write. I recommend an outline or web as one way to see how the sources that you have read are going to weave together. Your task is first to read all sources critically, and then to write an analysis that summarizes these readings into a critical synthesis.

Do not organize the focus paper around the references, by first discussing one author and in the next paragraph another author, and so forth. Instead, organize your focus paper around issues through which you can weave a number of sources together into the discussion of each issue. A useful technique is to use headings; many articles that you will read for this course are organized in this manner. Headings help the reader to identify the overall organization of your paper, and they help you as a writer to communicate what you intend to be the focus of each section. The final section of the paper will give you a chance to summarize your own reflections on research implications for classroom practices.


FYI Only: Titles of Past Reflective Papers

  • A brief introduction to first language attrition.comprehensive look at foreign language anxiety:
  • A new challenge for FL educators.
  • Bilingual classrooms and instructional approaches to maintain bilingualism.
  • Bilingual maintenance.
  • Bilingualism and language impairment.
  • Children growing up bilingually.
  • Code-switching.
  • English as a second language in Japan.
  • ESL students with learning disabilities: Is there a misrepresentation?
  • Finding a voice: Empowering parents of ESL students.
  • How do I ensure academic success in second language learners?
  • Implications of reading in the language acquisition process, specifically multicultural and bilingual literature.
  • Instructional approaches in the L2 classroom.
  • Language acquisition: From Pidginization to Creolization and beyond.
  • Motivation and strategies for second language learning.
  • Self-esteem and second language learner.
  • The effectiveness of bilingual education.
  • The politics of bilingual education.
  • The role of comprehensible input in second language acquisition.
  • Technology in the L2 classroom.

    Back to top



15-HOUR FIELD EXPERIENCE
GUIDELINES

To be completed at an International School

Important Note:

  • EDCI 516-601-FAST TRAIN has a 15-hour field experience requirement. This means that in addition to class work, each student must spend a minimum of 15 hours observing K-12 EFL/ ES/ FL classes at an International School;
  • FAST TRAIN students must arrange for their own placements. The field experience is normally completed at the international school in which the FAST TRAIN student is teaching in a classroom other than their own, unless other arrangements are made with the instructor;
  • It is possible to use one observation activity to satisfy the requirements for two or more FAST TRAIN courses as long as separate reports for each course are submitted.

Objectives:

As a result of this graduate course component, teachers working at international schools will:

  1. Gain first-hand familiarity through field observations of L2 (e.g., EFL, FL) teaching roles, goals, methods, and curricula in elementary and secondary schools, and related educational facilities, including writing of field observation reports;
  2. Observe the application of second language teaching strategies and methods embodied in the classroom procedures of the cooperating teachers.
  3. Understand the multicultural/ multilingual dimensions and mandates of international schools, including addressing the learning needs of a culturally and linguistically diverse student body;
  4. Develop the ability to think critically about current educational issues by analyzing advantages and disadvantages of certain educational approaches during school-based observation of lead teachers.
  5. Will have opportunities to discuss their school-based observations with each other, practicing teachers, and university instructors, comparing and contrasting teaching methods and styles at different levels and with culturally and linguistically diverse student populations.
  6. Observe and gain valuable insight into:
  a. Classroom practices currently in used at international schools;
  b. The use of various types of instructional technology;
  c. The use of curricula and texts;
  d. The implementation of standards;
  e. The areas of strength and weakness and the general learning pace of students at a given age and grade level.

Method:

As a requirement of the GMU Graduate School of Education, participants will engage in 15 hours of school-based field experiences. Students will engage in observations, interactions with students, and in teacher interviews in the school setting. A final written report should consist of three principle sections and be a total of 4-5 pages in length. Guidelines and suggested report format are described, as follows.

Report's Suggested Content and Format:

Following is the suggested format for accomplishing the written report that will accompany your field observations.

It is suggested that, in addition to a short introduction where you briefly describe the field setting, you have three (3) principle sections, as indicated in the sections numbered I, II, and III below.

Introduction

Name, location, and brief overview of of school observed (e.g., country, city, level, demographics, languages spoken, socioeconomic factors, etc.). A brief comment on how well this school is functioning; how well it addresses intended outcomes for student achievement in literacy, personalized instruction, and parent communication; and specific areas needing improvement.

Classroom you observed (e.g., grade level, number students, number of teachers and teacher aides);

Profile of the Cooperating teacher (e.g., academic background, years of service, courses/ subjects taught, languages spoken, international experience).

  • What are her/ his beliefs about teaching?
  • How are your beliefs incorporated in her/ his teaching methods and style?
  • What's are her/ his greatest teaching accomplishment.
Part One

Narrative Report which must include:

Pre- and Post-Observation interview(s);
Description and analysis of lesson(s) observed.

Part Two Reflexions, Conclusions, and appendixes (if necessary).

Attachment

Signed Field Observation Form.
Log and verification by cooperating teacher.
Please include hours and location reported (see attached form).

Part One -- Narrative Report

Targeting your Observation Notes: Some Recommendations

The following guiding questions may serve to target your observation notes. Your written report should synthesize the information gleaned from your observations. You need not cover all the topics listed; they are merely guides for your observation notes:

Teaching Style: (e.g., lecture, small groups, question and answer, hands-on activity, worksheet, using books, etc);
Students: (e.g., are they focused, are they participating actively, is teacher interacting with all students, do they understand the activity and the purpose, are they working together well, how do they interact with the teacher, etc.).
Daily routine. Variety of activities;
Seating arrangement (e.g., rows, tables, clusters of desks, cooperative groups);
Classroom appearance;
Clasroom/ educational environment;
Classroom management. How does the teacher create and maintain an effective environment for student
learning?
Classroom/ physical environment (e.g., background music, posters, photos).
How teacher incorporate multiple learning and teaching styles into lesson plans and react to faster/slower students;
Creating a safe physical environment that engages all students.
Homework;
Effect of having multiple cultures and languages in class;
Amount of L1, L2, L3 used both by students and teachers;
Use of daily lesson plan - objectives and implementation;

Use of visuals and/or instructional technology [VCR, TV, Internet access, interactive science projects,and multiple software including word processing and Inspiration];

Use of textbooks;
Percentage of time devoted to 4 skills (reading, writing, listening, speaking) and the 5th skill of thinking;

The remaining observation time should be spent engaging in classroom interaction with the teacher and students. This is hopefully an interactive - rather than a passive - experience for you. Suggestions follow for some possible interactive experiences:


Lesson Observations/Teacher Interviews:

A. Describe briefly one of the lessons observed - Use the following guidelines to focus your notes (You do not have to answer all of the questions here):

  1. Describe class - size, grade, subject, school, etc. How many FL/ ESL/ EFL and/or bilingual students were in the class?
  2. What were the lesson's objectives? Were they posted for the students?
  3. What are your objectives for today's lesson?
  4. How do the objectives for today's lesson relate to the goals of the course?
  5. How was the lesson introduced? Presented?
  6. What instructional activities were used? How cognitively demanding were they? Were the activities context embedded, or context reduced? (Examples?)
  7. What other instructional methods were used? (e.g. grouping).
  8. What type of student/teacher interactions took place? (e.g., formal, informal, personal, direct, etc.)
  9. Student/student interactions?
  10. How did the teacher assess the students' second language acquisition?
  11. What recognition, if any, was made for the following student characteristics and abilities:
    1. Prior knowledge, cultural and educational experience. How did the teacher connect students' prior knowledge, life experience, and interest with learning goals?
    2. Learning styles and strategies. What instructional strategies and resources did the teacher use to respond to students' diverse needs?
    3. Expectations/attitudes, confidence and initiative;
    4. Familiarity with the type of task?
    5. What resources were used to develop second language abilities? Instructional technology? Manipulatives?
    6. How did the teacher engagestudents in problem solving, critical thinking, and other activities that make subject matter meaningful.

B. Pre- and Post-Observation Teacher Interview -

Ask the Cooperating Teacher to conference about one of the EFL/ ELL/ FL lessons in order to ask her/him questions. For your planning purposes, a pre-observation interview may last 15-25 minutes, but you should be mindful of the teacher's time demands; the follow-up interview should only take 5-10 minutes. As you prepare for the interviews, you may want to use some of the questions below as a guide (add your own, or delete, as appropriate).

  1. Pre-Observation Questions:
    1. How do you think children and adults best acquire/ learn a second language? (There are two extremes: learning rules, memorizing vocabulary, practicing correct grammar, etc. vs. focus on meaning and not language forms. Most teachers fall somewhere in between);
    2. What are your general SLA goals for your EFL/ ELL/ FL students? What skills and knowledge do you want them to develop? Are you following a standard curriculum for ELL/FL language development that contains goals and objectives?
    3. How do you like to present new material? What types of classroom activities do you prefer?
    4. How do you see your role in class? (In terms of a continuum between teacher-centered on one end, and student-centered on the other.)
    5. How do you see the role of students? How much responsibility do you provide for and expect of your students? Do you expect the same responsibility from each one?
    6. Do your students' cultural and linguistic backgrounds affect your teaching methods? If yes, in what ways?
  2. In terms of the upcoming lesson:

    1. What is the objective of the lesson?
    2. What types of SLA strategies will you use with the ELL students?
    3. What types of assessment strategies will you use?
    4. What types of materials will you use?
  3. Post-Observation:
    1. What was the teacher's impression of the lesson?
    2. Did s/he think the objectives were accomplished?
    3. Why or why not?

Part II: Reflections/ Conclusions

This final section provides you with the opportunity to draw together theory and practice by reflecting on the observations, activities and/or interviews. You should comment on how the information gleaned applies to second language acquisition research issues and practices we have examined and discussed in this course.

  • What did you like most about this particular class and/or the instructor's teaching effectiveness?
  • What specific suggestions would you make to improve this particular class and/or the instructor's teaching effectiveness?
  • Did you learn anything in the pre- or post-observation sessions that influenced or modified
    your responses?
  • Overall, how would you rate the instructor?

It is suggested that you select three or four issues and target your comments in order to avoid redundancy. As you think and write about these school-based activities, you should refer to the EDCI 516-601-FAST TRAIN readings and discussions. (For example, were they reflected in the lesson, or the teacher's belief system? How? How did this experience affect your own beliefs and future practices?)

This section will probably be one to one and a half pages. One paragraph should state how this knowledge may be applied to your current or future teaching situation.


BE SURE TO THANK THE TEACHER FOR HER/HIS TIME.


[Field Experience Reporting Form]
Upon Completion -- to be mailed or faxed to instructor


GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
Graduate School of Education
Center for Multilingual/ Multicultural Education
FAST TRAIN Program - MSN 4D1
Fairfax, VA 22030-4444


FIELD EXPERIENCE REPORTING FORM
EDCI 516-601-FAST TRAIN
Summer 2002


Name:

School:

City, Country:

Course: EDCI 516-601-FAST TRAIN

Title: Bilingualism and Language Acquisition Research

Professor: Jorge P. Osterling, Ph.D.

Clock Hours: 15

Observation Site
Class / Grade

Teacher
Activity Title
Length of Activity
Date
Hours on site
           
           
           
           

Back to top



Rubrics

Please use the following rubrics to assess and grade EDCI 516-601 course assignments. Please remember that you could also lose points in formatting (APA), grammar, mechanics, spelling.

Classroom and On-Line Participation Rubric
(20% of Grade)

Criteria
   
1. Student engages intensely in classroom activities or electronic discussions even when answers or solutions are not immediately
apparent.
Not Evident Rarely, if ever, shows determination in the pursuit of solutions or uses strategies to keep self on track.
Developing Sporadically shows determination in the pursuit of solutions and uses strategies to keep self on track.
Proficient Consistently shows determination in the pursuit of solutions and uses strategies to keep self on track.
Exemplary Consistently demonstrates strong determination in the pursuit of solutions, monitors his or her level of involvement, and develops and uses a number of strategies to keep self on task.
2. Degree to which student integrates course readings into classroom
participation
Not Evident Unable to cite from readings; cannot use readings to support points; cannot articulates "fit" of readings with topic at hand.
Developing Rarely able to cite from readings; rarely uses readings to support points;
rarely articulates "fit" of readings with topic at hand.
Proficient Occasionally cites from readings; sometimes uses readings to support points; occasionally articulates "fit" of readings with topic at hand.
Exemplary Often cites from readings; uses readings to support points; often articulates "fit" of readings with topic at hand.
3.Interaction/participation
in classroom and on-line discussions
Not Evident Never a willing participant, never able to respond to questions; never volunteers point of view.
Developing Rarely a willing participant, rarely able to respond to questions; rarely volunteers point of view.
Proficient Often a willing participant, responds occasionally to questions; occasionally volunteers point of view.
Exemplary Always a willing participant, responds frequently to questions;
routinely volunteers point of view.
4. Interaction/participation
in classroom and on-line learning activities
Not Evident Never a willing participant, often acts inappropriately during role plays; etc., never able to respond to direct questions; never volunteers point of view
Developing Rarely a willing participant, occasionally acts inappropriately during role
plays; etc., rarely able to respond to direct questions; rarely volunteers point of view.
Proficient Often a willing participant; acts appropriately during role plays; etc., responds occasionally to questions; occasionally volunteers point of view
Exemplary Always a willing participant; acts appropriately during all role plays;
etc., responds frequently to questions; routinely volunteers
point of view.
5. Demonstration of
professional attitude and
demeanor
Not Evident Rarely prepared; often arrives late; never solicits instructors'
perspective outside class.
Developing Often unprepared; occasionally arrives late; rarely solicits instructors' or colleagues perspective electronically or outside class.
Proficient Rarely unprepared; rarely arrives late; occasionally solicits instructors'
or collegues' perspective electronically or outside of class.
Exemplary Always demonstrates commitment through thorough preparation; always arrives on time; often solicits instructors' perspective outside class

Reflective Paper Rubric
(20 % of Grade)

Criteria
   
1. A review of theories that inform your own position. There may be any number of these, including just one if that one is comprehensive and powerful enough to cover all teaching needs. Not Evident No evidence of research. Personal experience. Is unable to critique the
findings of published research using knowledge of L2 research
and methodology.
Developing Little evidence of research. Referred mostly to class or outside reading.Although critiques, summarizes, and interprets the main findings from published research, work is uneven and readers gain few insights.
Proficient Critiques, summarizes, and interprets the main
findings from published research. Some evidence of research integrated into the reflective paper.
Exemplary Insightfully and completely critiques, summarizes, and interprets the findings from published research.Used wide variety of resources and quotes. Brought in new resources --all relates to the topic.
Evidence of scientific research integrated throughout reflective paper.
2. A statement of your own theoretical framework drawn from these theories and other sources, such as experience and observation. . Not Evident Very little or very weak attempt to relate evidence to argument; may be no
identifiable argument, or no evidence to relate it to.
Developing Quotes appear often without analysis relating them to mini-thesis (or there is a weak mini-thesis to support), or analysis offers nothing beyond the quote.
Proficient Evidence often related to mini-thesis, though links perhaps not very clear.
Exemplary Clearly relates evidence to "mini-thesis" (topic sentence); analysis is fresh and exciting, posing new ways to think of the material.
3. A reflection on how this theoretical framework will be applied and will affect your professional work as an L2 teacher. Not Evident Does not apply knowledge to teaching situations at international schools
Developing Minimal application of knowledge to teaching situations at international
schools.
Proficient Some knowledge application to teaching situations at international schools.
Exemplary Applies knowledge to teaching situations at international
schools;
4. Contributions
of research to education,
knowledge, and practice
Not Evident Cannot articulate the contributions of L1 and L2 research to education, knowledge, and practice. missing conclusion.
Developing Can discuss some contributions of L1 and L2 research to education, knowledge, and practice, but explanations are not comprehensive.Weak conclusion.
Proficient Explains the major contributions of L1 and L2 research to education, knowledge, and practice. Adequate
conclusion
Exemplary

Articulates the contributions of L1 and L2 research to education, knowledge, and practice. Effective conclusion.

5. Presentation and APA Format Not Evident Few or no APA formatting requirements are met (e.g., title page, abstract, page numbers, double-space). Report is is messy and hard to follow. Poor grammar and spelling significantly reduce the readability of the report.
Developing Some formatting requirements are followed some of the time. The
layout used is clumsy. There may be a significant number of misspelled words or poorly constructed sentences. However,the gist of the report can still be determined despite these technical writing difficulties.
Proficient Most of the formatting requirements are met fairly consistently. The
layout used is easy to read and follow. Grammar and spelling
used is basically correct. There are only a few misspelled words or awkward sentences.
Exemplary All required sections are present and in correct order. Paper is typed, font size and type requirements are met. Layout conventions are used and followed consistently. Report is easy to read and follow.
All sentences are grammatically correct. All spelling is correct.

 


Course Field Project Rubric
(30 % of Grade)

1. Recorded and analysed a 4 - 10 minute audio language sample from an ESL/ EFL/ FL learner [any age or grade level].
Not Evident Did not taped (audio/ video) nor transcribed L2 language sample as described in guidelines.
Developing Taped (audio/ video) and transcribed L2 language sample but not as described in guidelines.
Proficient Taped (audio/ video) and transcribed L2 language sample as described in guidelines.
Exemplary Taped (audio/ video) and transcribed L2 language sample as described in guidelines.
2. Analyzed second language acquisition patterns among EFL/ ES/ FL learners. Not Evident N o analysis or reflection included. Opinion. No support. Superficial assumptions.
Developing Analysis and reflection does not adequately/ throughfully address the areas studies.
Proficient Analysis and reflection throughly addressed most areas. Reflects on class themes or cites references.
Exemplary Analysis and reflection throughly addressed areas covered in course content. Deeper explanations with support from sources and class themes.
3. Language Not Evident No professional or incorrect language.
Developing Sporadic use of professional vocabulary.
Proficient Some professional vocabulary.
Exemplary Professional vocabulary, phrasing, and tone.
4. Context. Brief personal/ family life history of sample participant. Not Evident Limited factual data.
Developing Sporadic use of factual data.
Proficient Case evidence used to make point. Limited connection.
Exemplary Multiple context. Rich. Concise.
5. Presentation and APA Format Not Evident Few or no APA formatting requirements are met (e.g., title page, abstract, page numbers, double-space). Report is is messy and hard to follow. Poor grammar and spelling significantly reduce the readability of the report.
Developing Some formatting requirements are followed some of the time. The
layout used is clumsy. There may be a significant number of misspelled words or poorly constructed sentences. However,the gist of the report can still be determined despite these technical writing difficulties.
Proficient Most of the formatting requirements are met fairly consistently. The
layout used is easy to read and follow. Grammar and spelling
used is basically correct. There are only a few misspelled words or awkward sentences.
Exemplary All required sections are present and in correct order. Paper is typed, font size and type requirements are met. Layout conventions are used and followed consistently. Report is easy to read and follow.
All sentences are grammatically correct. All spelling is correct.

 


Classroom Lesson Rubric
(15 % of grade)

 

Criteria
© ED's Oasis
http://www.classroom.com/ edsoasis/TGuild/MsRubric.html
*Permission to copy or reprint this rubric is granted only if the copyright notice is included. Any use of these materials for commercial gain is prohibited.
1. Curriculum and Standards
[e.g, LEA, state or national]
Not Evident No connection.
Developing Some connections to core curriculum with few references to a course of
study and to curriculum standards.
Proficient Connections to core curriculum with clear references to a course of study and curriculum standards.
Exemplary Supports core curricum content and appropriate to the targeted student
population;
Well integrated with course of study and with curriculum standards.
2. Student-Centerdness
Not Evident Lesson flat and uninspiring;
Students not engaged.
Developing Appealing lesson;
Student choice and fexibility are limited.
Proficient Appealing lesson;
Evidence of instructional flexibility or accommodation of students' interests.
Exemplary Appealing lesson;
Invites students to be creative;
Supports students choice;
Encourages students to take responsibility for learning.
3. Collaborative Learning Not Evident Neither students nor teachers work as teams or
partners.
Developing One of following is true:
1.A team of teachers shares some responsibility for the design and
implementation of the project;
2.Teams of students worked together on at least part of the session.
Proficient One of the following is true:
1.Unit is clearly a joint effort of a team of teachers;
2.Students are rewquired to work in teams for most of the project;
3.Classes depend on gathering data or input from geographically distant partners.
Exemplary Two of the following are true:
1.Unit is clearly a joint effort of a team of teachers;
2.Students are rewquired to work in teams for most of the project;
3.Classes depend on gathering data or input from geographically distant partners.
4. Teacher's Role Not Evident Lesson does not define teacher's role.
Developing Lesson alludes to the teacher's role either through general tips; or the
teacher's role is implicit in the lesson description.
Proficient Lesson describes the teacher's specific activities and how s/he is
to support student learning.
Exemplary Lesson describes the teacher's specific activities and how s/he is to support and assess student learning.
Lesson identifies potential challenges inherent to the lesson and suggests alternative instructional strategies.
5. Instructional Design Not Evident Incomplete or sketchy lesson.
Developing Lesson is complete, but lacks depth. Lesson does not offer strategies for adaptations to diverse learning syles or student populations with
special needs (e.g., culturally and linguistically diverse, students with/out
disabilities).
Proficient Lesson is complete and goes into depth. Lacks specific examples of adaptations to diverse learning syles or student populations with special
needs (e.g., culturally and linguistically diverse, students with/out disabilities).
Exemplary Lesson is complete, deep, and adaptable. Offers extensions for more motivated learners and/or adaptations for students with special needs or
learning style preferences.
6. Educational Objectives/
Performance-based
Assessment Strategies
Not Evident No evidence of connection between instructional objectives nor assessment strategies.
Developing Some mention of educational objectives; Inadequate or incomplete references to assessments.
Proficient Adequate identification of educational objectives and performance-based assessment strategies.
Exemplary Educational objectives are clear, obtainable, and measurable.
Multiple and alternative perfformance-based assessment strategies are
used..
7. Ease of Use Not Evident Several potential flaws:
-Demanding time frame;
-Too limited;
-Too expensive;
Developing Scope of lesson is challenging. Uses some materials or strategies which are not typically available or manageable.
Proficient Scope of the lesson appears to be manageable in a typical classroom of the targeted grade level and subject. BUT, has not been tested and used with students.
Exemplary Scope of the lesson is manageable in a typical classroom of the targeted
grade level and subject. Lesson has been tested and used with students,
and the teacher has provided reflective comments about her/ his experiences.
8. Instructional Technology Not Evident Treats students as passive recipients of information; Not well designed Trivial use of mediums.
Developing Use of Internet is focused, and may originate from a teacher-designed web site.
Proficient

Lesson's use of the Internet helps students achieve their learning objectives by involving them actively in at least one of the following ways:

  • Searching for information;
  • Communicating with peers or experts
Exemplary

Adequate and appropriate use of various types of instructional technology [e.g., VCR, TV, Internet access, interactive science projects,and multiple software including word processing and Inspiration].Lesson's use of the Internet helps students achieve their learning objectives by involving them actively in:

  • Searching for information;
  • Communicating with peers or experts;
  • Synthesizing their nformation and/ or data into a presentation that is published on line.

 


Field Experience/ Observation and Report Rubric
(15% of grade)

 


Criteria
 

15-Clock Hours Observing EFL/ ESL/ FL classes

1. Student spent a minimum of 15 hours preparing, observing and participating at K-12 EFL/ ESL/ FL classes at an International School
Not Evident Missing more than 8 observation hours, as required by GMU-GSE.
Developing Missing 5-to-8 classroom observation hours, as required by GMU-GSE.
Proficient Missing 1-4 classroom observation hours, as required by GMU-GSE.
Exemplary

Carefully planned, and chosen field experience opportunity at an international school.
Observation hours completed, as required by GMU-GSE.
Voluntarily assisted cooperating teacher in classroom.

2. School and class observed (e.g., location, demographics, ambiance, culture, physical environment, socioeconomic issues). Not Evident Minimal factual data. Does not describe or analyze school and classroom culture/ physical environment.
Superficial overview of context or environment in which school/ classroom are located.
Developing Limited factual data, and limited description of school and classroom culture/ physical environment.
Proficient Some factual data, and description fo school and classroom cultura/ physical environment.
Exemplary

Educational facility: briefly describes programmatic, functional, spatial, and environmental characteristics of both the school and classroom.
School and classroom culture: analyzes the attitudes and beliefs of persons both inside the school and in the external environment, the cultural norms of the school, and the relationships between persons in the school/ classroom and its impact or influence in creating an authentic learning environment.

3. Cooperating Teacher Not Evident

Cooperating teacher not interviewed (e.g., pre- and post-observation interviews)
Profile of cooperating teacher(s) neither addressed nor included.

Developing Sporadic information on cooperating teacher.
Proficient Some evidence used to make point. Limited connection.
Exemplary

Careful and thoughtful interview of cooperativing teacher.
Included her/his profile (e.g., teaching philosophy, academic background, years of service, courses/ subjects taught, languages spoken, international experience).
Conducted several pre- and post-observation interviews.

4. Lesson(s) Observed

 

 

 


5. Report
Not Evident Quietly sat in the back of the classroom. Did not participate nor get involved in the classroom.
Developing Did not participate nor get involved in observed classroom. Superficial discussion of teaching syle and student involvement.
Proficient Attaches and briefly analyzes/ comments/ discusses lesson plan.
Limited analysis of teaching syle and student involvement/ participation.
Exemplary

Lesson plan attached and discussed: Includes: (a) Summary of lesson plan; (b) Objectives and Implementation; (c) Activities involved; (d) Materials used; (e) Teaching styles; (e) SLA strategies used; (f) Assessment.
Addresses degree to which teacher employs direct instruction.
Includes analysis of student involvement/ participation.

Not Evident No reflections on classroom observations and activities;
Does not apply knowledge/ experience to future teaching;
Does not use professional literature.
Developing Does not provide requested comments or reflection on observed lessons or classroom environment;
Very limited application of knowledge/ experience to future teaching.
Proficient Does not comment or reflect on all areas of the observed classroom/ lesson/ student observed or does not reflect with depth;
Knowledge applied minimally to teaching at international schools;
Limited use of professional literature to support analysis.
Exemplary Discussed strengths and weaknesses of the teacher(s) interviewed and lesson(s) observed.
Thoughful comments and reflection on observed classroom/ lesson/ students observed;
Applied knowledge to teaching L2 at international schools;
Extensive use of professional literature to support analysis.
6. Presentation and APA Format Not Evident Few or no APA formatting requirements are met (e.g., title page, abstract, page numbers, double-space). Report is is messy and hard to follow. Poor grammar and spelling significantly reduce the readability of the report.
Developing Some formatting requirements are followed some of the time. The
layout used is clumsy. There may be a significant number of misspelled words or poorly constructed sentences. However,the gist of the report can still be determined despite these technical writing difficulties.
Proficient Most of the formatting requirements are met fairly consistently. The
layout used is easy to read and follow. Grammar and spelling
used is basically correct. There are only a few misspelled words or awkward sentences.
Exemplary All required sections are present and in correct order. Paper is typed, font size and type requirements are met. Layout conventions are used and followed consistently. Report is easy to read and follow.
All sentences are grammatically correct. All spelling is correct.