Honors 353:001
Cybernetics and the Technological Singularity
Classes meet Mondays and Wednesdays from 3:00-4:15 in Science and Tech I 126
Course Description
The course will begin with the concept of Cybernetics, popularized by Norbert Wiener's Human Use of Human Beings, a book he wrote specifically to explain cybernetics to the interested non-expert. Cybernetics, as Wiener and the first generation of computer engineers defined it, is the science of control and communication in machines, animals, and humans. Cybernetics gave us the concept of the "cybernetic organism"—the cyborg. We will then explore later technological advances in computer and biological sciences. We will explore the idea of a technological singularity in our future—a point at which technological advances outrun our ability to control or predict.
Texts:
Print:
Norbert Wiener. The Human Use of Human Beings. ISBN: 0306803208
(15.00)
Kurzweil, Ray. The Singularity is Near. ISBN: 0143037889 (18.00)
Joel Garreau. Radical Evolution. ISBN 0767915038. ($15.95)
Prices as of January 12, 2007. If you are charged more at the bookstore,
let me know.
Online:
Vernor Vinge, "Technological
Singularity"
Cory Doctorow, Down and Out in
the Magic Kingdom (selections)
Course Blog:
<inactive>
Assignments:
The assignments in this course consist of three essays, weekly reading responses, and a final exam. The first essay will be an analysis of some complex system in light of Norbert Wiener's concept of cybernetics. The system may be biological, social, mechanical, digital, or any combination of these. The second essay will be a research project investigating some of the objections to Ray Kurzweil's vision of the Singularity. In particular, Bill Joy and John Searle raise very serious (and very different) objections. The third essay will be an investigation of some of the other scenarios presented in Joel Garreau's Radical Evolution.
The weekly responses will be posted the class blog, to which you have all been invited as contributors. The weekly responses will be on a specific question which I will post, and they will be due before class on most Mondays (if there is an essay due that week, there is no weekly response). You may add to your posts after class, of course. I will also ask you to comment on the posts of other students. To earn full credit for the responses, you must post 10 weekly responses, and comment on at least five of your fellow students' posts.
The final exam will be a cumulative in-class short essay exam. I will post study terms a week or so before the exam. The exam date is Monday, May 14th, from 1:30-4:15. Bluebooks are not required, but they are convenient.
Essay 1 (Cybernetics) | February 21 | 20% |
Essay 2 (Singularity) | March 28 | 25% |
Essay 3 (Research Paper) | May 2 | 20% |
Weekly readings responses | most Mondays | 20% |
Final Exam | May 14, 1:30-4:15 | 15% |
Course Policies
Grading: Grades on the essays will be based primarily on the quality of the writing. I value clear, focused writing with plenty of examples. Grades on the research essay (#2) will be based on the quality of the research as well: I expect you to use the GMU LIbrary databases as well as the Internet.
Late Assignments: Late papers will
lose one-half letter grade per day unless you make prior arrangements with
me.
Revision Policy: The essays may be revised for a higher grade,
but they must be substantially revised. You cannot lose a grade by
revising, but a higher grade is not guaranteed. I have found that "B" papers
(or higher) are often more difficult to revise, since serious revision
requires thoroughly changing the essay's structure, and "B" papers
usually have a fairly good structure. "C" papers (or lower) often
respond more dramatically to revision, since the major changes they require
are often more straightforward. I recommend revising "C" papers
or lower only. If you plan to revise a "B" paper, please
see me beforehand so we can discuss a revision strategy.
All revisions must be turned in by
Plagiarism: The GMU
Honor code is available online. I will report suspected cases of plagiarism
to the Honor Committee.