Guide to MLA Style for Citations

Alok Yadav, George Mason University, Version 1.2 (March 2007)

(Best viewed in a full-size window.)

Works Cited Lists: Overview of Formats for Entries || Books || Parts of Books

Articles || Online Publications || Films and Videos || Arrangement of Items in Works Cited List

In-Text Citations: Overview || Examples || (Further References)

Introduction

The purpose of documentation is to give credit to the sources from which you have drawn ideas, words, or information, and to allow others to follow-up the sources you have used for your work. You need to provide information that is sufficiently clear and complete for others to identify the specific sources you have made use of---in order to avoid plagiarism and to allow others to corroborate and learn from your work as fully as possible. The documentation style developed by the Modern Language Association of America (MLA style) offers one conventional system for doing this; in published sources, you will also see other systems in use (such as that of the Chicago Manual of Style or that of the American Psychological Association [APA Style]). This guide summarizes the main features of MLA documentation style, but, if you want to master MLA style, it also helps to examine actual published work that makes use of MLA style (such as essays in PMLA) to see these guidelines in action, as it were. For full discussion of the MLA style conventions, however, you should consult Joseph Gibaldi, MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, 6th ed. (2003). (See, also, other works listed in the section of this guide on "Further References."

Your documentation efforts will only be as good as your bibliographic note-keeping while you are researching a paper. Whenever you undertake research for an assignment, you should record the bibliographic information for each source that you have consulted, as well as page references for each quotation, idea, or bit of information you draw from that source. You will need this information, both for in-text citations and for the works cited list for your paper. If you fail to record this information initially, it can often be difficult to retrieve the necessary information later on.

MLA style makes use of parenthetical in-text citations, keyed to a works cited list at the end of your paper. The basic idea is to present the minimum necessary documentation in the in-text citation to allow your reader to locate the relevant item in the works cited list, and to find the specific passage that you are referencing in that work. The full bibliographic information for the item is presented in the works cited list. This allows for efficient, unobstrusive documentation of sources, but the minimalism of MLA style can also lead to ambiguities and omissions if you are not careful. It is essential to re-check your in-text citing of sources and the correlation between in-text citations and the works cited list before finally submitting a research paper.

Sample entries for different kinds of source materials are given in the next sections: first a quick overview of formats for the major kinds of source materials, followed by fuller discussion of each type of citation in subsequent subsections. Keep in mind that this guide currently does not deal with citations of museum or art gallery exhibitions, artworks (paintings, sculptures, photographs), public monuments, performances (theater, dance, opera, concert), lectures or readings, musical compositions, advertisements, television programs, CDs, LPs, other audio formats, oral interviews, personal communications (oral or written), memos, unpublished manuscripts, legal sources, maps, charts, cartoons, comic strips, online chatrooms, online discussion lists, email, and other kinds of source material. If you notice errors in this document, or come across cases (that fall within its coverage range) that are not treated adequately (or at all) in the examples provided, please let me know via email.

Overview of Formats for Entries in Works Cited List

Back to Top

The works cited list should include all sources used in your paper, and only those sources. If you want to include sources that you consulted but did not directly make use of in your paper, you can present a "Works Consulted" list instead. (But, with most essay assignments, the expectation is that you will document only the sources you actually use in your paper.) The works cited list appears at the end of your paper, beginning on a new page but continuing the page numbering from your paper. (For example, if the body of your paper ends on page 6, your works cited list will begin on page 7.) The title "Works Cited" (without quotation marks or underlining) should be centered at the top of the page. Each entry in the works cited list should be double-spaced, just like the rest of your paper. Each entry should begin flush with the left-hand margin, but if it continues onto other lines, these should be indented one-half inch (or five spaces). This format is called hanging indentation and can be set using your word processing program. (The examples below show you what this format looks like.)

The basic formats for entries in a works cited list are outlined below for four common types of sources: a book; a selection from a book; an article in a scholarly journal (or other periodical publication); an online publication. This is meant to give you a sense of the kinds of bibliographic information you should record for each type of source (in the templates) and what the format of an entry should look like (in the numbered examples), but you should also consult the examples given in subsequent sections for refinements and variations on these format requirements. (The templates are repeated again at the start of each subsection.)

For a Book

(Go to section)

(1) author's name (lastname, firstname); (2) title of whole work (underlined); (3) name of editor, translator, compiler, etc. (where applicable); (4) edition used (where applicable); (5) number of volumes in the work (where applicable); (6) publication information (place of publication, name of publisher, year of publication)
[template 1]

Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Corrected ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1998.
[example 1.0]

For Part of a Book

(Go to section)

(1) author's name (lastname, firstname); (2) title of the selection from the whole work (in quotation marks, unless the piece is book-length and was originally published as an independent work---in which case, underline the title); (3) title of the whole work (underlined); (4) name of editor, translator, compiler, etc. (where applicable); (5) edition used (where applicable); (6) publication information (place of publication: name of publisher, year of publication); (7) page numbers.
[template 2]

Reiss, Timothy J. "Mapping Identities: Literature, Nationalism, Colonialism." Debating World Literature. Ed. Christopher Prendergast. London: Verso, 2004. 110-47.
[example 2.0]

For an Article from a Scholarly Journal:

(Go to section)

(1) author's name (lastname, firstname); (2) title of article (in quotation marks); (3) title of journal (underlined); (4) volume number (and issue number, if pagination begins anew with each issue); (5) year of publication (in parentheses); (6) page numbers.
[template 3]

Das Gupta, Arun. "Rabindranath Tagore in Indonesia: An Experiment in Bridge-Building." Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 158 (2002): 451-77.
[example 3.0]

This section also discusses citation of articles from magazines and newspapers, and citation of book reviews.

For an Online Publication

(Go to section)

(1) author's name (lastname, firstname); (2) title of the document (in quotation marks---but see exceptions for entire websites, online books, home pages); (3) information about print publication (if applicable and available); (4) title of the website (underlined); (5) name of editor (where applicable); (6) version number of document (where available); (7) date of online publication (or the latest update) (where available); (8) name of institution or organization that sponsors the site (often listed at the bottom of a site's homepage) (if not cited earlier); (9) date you accessed the material; (10) URL (in angle brackets)
[template 4]

"English Emblem Book Chronology." The English Emblem Book Project. Penn State University Libraries. August 2, 2005. <http://emblem.libraries.psu.edu/
chrono.htm>
[example 4.0]

Note: The MLA Handbook does not insert the word "Accessed" before the date of access, but relies instead on placement to distinguish between date of online publication (item 7 in the list above) and date of access of material (item 9). The last date on which you accessed the webpage is always included, so if there is only one date listed (as in the example above), it is automatically understood to be the access date. If another date (the date of online publication) is included, it will precede the access date. The MLA style conventions provide guidelines for citing sources (including online sources) in a print document (e.g., an essay you submit in hardcopy); they do not address format issues for citations in an online document (such as this one), in which you might use hyperlinks instead of providing URLs in the body of the text. See the section on "Further References" below for further discussion.

For a Film

(Go to section)

(1) title of film (underlined); (2) name of director; (3) optionally, names of other personnel that you wish to include (such as writer, performers, producer); (4) name of distributor; (5) year of release.
[template 5]

The Scavengers. Dir. Eduardo Coutinho. First Run/Icarus, 1992.
[example 5.0]

Section 1: Format for Books

Back to Top || Back to Overview

(1) author's name (lastname, firstname); (2) title of whole work (underlined); (3) name of editor, translator, compiler, etc. (where applicable); (4) edition used (where applicable); (5) number of volumes in the work (where applicable); (6) publication information (place of publication, name of publisher, year of publication)
[template 1]

Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Corrected ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1998.
[example 1.0]

Thompson, John B. Books in the Digital Age: The Transformation of Academic and Higher Education Publishing in Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Polity, 2005.
[example 1.1]

Morson, Gary Saul and Caryl Emerson. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Poetics. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1990.
[example 1.2]

Quirk, Randolph, et al. A Comprehensive Reference Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman, 1985.
[example 1.3]

Gates, Henry Louis, Jr. Loose Canons: Notes on the Culture Wars. 1992. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1993.
[example 1.4]

Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of Literature. Springfield: Merriam-Webster, 1995.
[example 1.5]

University of Chicago Press. The Chicago Manual of Style. 15th ed. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003.
[example 1.6]

Lenin, Vladimir Ilich. What Is To Be Done? Trans. S. V. Utechin and Patricia Utechin. Ed. S. V. Utechin. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1963.
[example 1.7]

Tatar, Maria. Off with Their Heads! Fairy Tales and the Culture of Childhood. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1992.
[example 1.8]

Cheyfitz, Eric. The Poetics of Imperialism: Translation and Colonization from The Tempest to Tarzan. Expanded ed. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1997.
[example 1.9]

Felsenstein, Frank, ed. English Trader, Indian Maid: Representing Gender, Race, and Slavery in the New World; An Inkle and Yarico Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1999.
[example 1.10]

Booth, Alison, J. Paul Hunter, and Kelly J. Mays, ed. The Norton Introduction to Literature. 9th ed. New York: Norton, 2005.
[example 1.11]

Marlowe, Christopher. Tamburlaine the Great. Ed. J. S. Cunningham. The Revels Plays. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1981.
[example 1.12]

Cunningham, J. S., ed. Tamburlaine the Great. By Christopher Marlowe. The Revels Plays. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1981.
[example 1.13]

Edgeworth, Maria. Castle Rackrent and Ennui. Ed. Marilyn Butler. London: Penguin, 1992.
[example 1.14]

Molière. The Misanthrope and Other Plays. Trans. John Wood and David Coward. Ed. David Coward. London: Penguin, 2000.
[example 1.15]

Smollett, Tobias. The Adventures of Ferdinand Count Fathom. 1753. Ed. Jerry C. Beasley. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1988.
[example 1.16]

Note: The notion of an "edition" can be confusing, since the term is commonly used in several distinct senses. A work can be revised and published in a new edition: in such cases, edition information must be included in your bibliographic entry (e.g., "Rev. ed." [for revised edition] or "3rd ed." or "Abr. ed." [for abridged edition] or "Expanded ed.") [1.6, 1.9, 1.11]. In other cases, a work is republished (i.e., the same, unrevised text) in a new format (e.g., a paperback "edition") or in an "edition" by a new publisher (e.g., after it has been out of print for some time): in such cases, you should include the date of original publication as well as the bibliographic information for the "edition" you are using [1.4, 1.23, 1.24]. Finally, literary and other cultural works are often edited and published in new scholarly or teaching "editions": in such cases, you need to include the name of the editor(s), along with the full bibliographic information for this new edition [1.12-16, 1.20, 1.22].

Rothenberg, Jerome and Pierre Joris, ed. Poems for the Millennium: The University of California Book of Modern and Postmodern Poetry. 2 vols. Berkeley: U of California P, 1995-98.
[example 1.17]

Cassidy, Frederic, ed. Dictionary of American Regional English. 3 vols. to date. Cambridge: Belknap-Harvard UP, 1985- .
[example 1.18]

Rothenberg, Jerome and Pierre Joris, ed. Poems for the Millennium: The University of California Book of Modern and Postmodern Poetry. Vol. 1. Berkeley: U of California P, 1995.
[example 1.19]

Crane, Stephen. The Red Badge of Courage: An Episode of the American Civil War. 1895. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1975. Vol. 2 of The University of Virginia Edition of the Works of Stephen Crane. Ed. Fredson Bowers. 10 vols. 1969-79.
[example 1.20]

Barrows, Herbert. Reading the Short Story. Vol. 1 of An Introduction to Literature. Ed. Gordon N. Ray. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1959.
[example 1.21]

Donne, John. The Anniversaries and the Epicedes and Obsequies. Ed. Gary A. Stringer and Ted-Larry Pebworth. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1995. Vol. 6 of The Variorum Edition of the Poetry of John Donne. Gen. ed. Gary A. Stringer. 8 vols. to date. 1995- .
[example 1.22]

Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. 1925. Introd. Matthew J. Bruccoli. New York: Collier, 1992.
[example 1.23]

The WPA Guide to 1930s Alabama. Tuscaloosa: U of Alabama P, 2000. Rpt. of Alabama: A Guide to the Deep South. 1941.
[example 1.24]

Duck, Stephen. Poems on Several Occasions. London, 1736.
[example 1.25]

You should consult the MLA Handbook for various other cases, such as how to handle publishers' imprints, multiple publishers, books in series, government publications, proceedings of a conference, books with missing publication information, unpublished and published dissertations.

Section 2: Format for Parts of Books

Back to Top || Back to Overview

(1) author's name (lastname, firstname); (2) title of the selection from the whole work (in quotation marks, unless the piece is book-length and was originally published as an independent work---in which case, underline the title); (3) title of the whole work (underlined); (4) name of editor, translator, compiler, etc. (where applicable); (5) edition used (where applicable); (6) publication information (place of publication: name of publisher, year of publication); (7) page numbers.
[template 2]

Reiss, Timothy J. "Mapping Identities: Literature, Nationalism, Colonialism." Debating World Literature. Ed. Christopher Prendergast. London: Verso, 2004. 110-47.
[example 2.0]

Munro, Alice. "Boys and Girls." The Norton Introduction to Literature. Ed. Alison Booth, J. Paul Hunter, and Kelly J. Mays. 9th ed. New York: Norton, 2005. 509-19.
[example 2.1]

Emerson, Ralph Waldo. "Art and Criticism." Emerson's Literary Criticism. Ed. and Introd. Eric W. Carlson. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1995. 84-96.
[example 2.2]

Arnould-Mussot, Jean-François. The American Heroine: A Pantomime in Three Acts. Trans. Samuel Chandler. English Trader, Indian Maid: Representing Gender, Race, and Slavery in the New World; An Inkle and Yarico Reader. Ed. Frank Felsenstein. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1999. 234-46.
[example 2.3]

Beckford, William. Vathek, An Arabian Tale. 1786. Vathek and Other Stories: A William Beckford Reader. Ed. Malcolm Jack. 1993. London: Penguin, 1995. 27-121.
[example 2.4]

Tilley, Virginia Q. "Mestizaje and the 'Ethnicization' of Race in Latin America." Race and Nation: Ethnic Systems in the Modern World. Ed. Paul Spickard. New York: Routledge, 2005. 53-68.
[example 2.5]

Gosse, Edmund. "Behn, Aphra." Dictionary of National Biography. 1885.
[example 2.6]

"Fiction." Def. 5a. Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989.
[example 2.7]

"Broumas, Olga." The Feminist Companion to Literature in English: Women Writers from the Middle Ages to the Present. Ed. Virginia Blain, Patricia Clements, and Isobel Grundy. New Haven: Yale UP, 1990.
[example 2.8]

Goldstone, Richard J. Foreword. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. By Martha Minow. Boston: Beacon, 1998. ix-xiii.
[example 2.9]

Bhabha, Homi K. "Framing Fanon." Foreword. The Wretched of the Earth. By Frantz Fanon. Trans. Richard Philcox. Pref. Jean-Paul Sartre. New York: Grove, 2004. vii-xli.
[example 2.10]

Williams, Raymond. Preface. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. By Williams. Rev. ed. New York: Oxford UP, 1985. 27.
[example 2.11]

Anderson, Benedict. Introduction. Mapping the Nation. Ed. Gopal Balakrishnan. London: Verso, in association with New Left Review, 1996. 1-16.
[example 2.12]

Moretti, Franco. "Conjectures on World Literature." New Left Review 2nd ser. 1 (2000): 54-68. Rpt. in Debating World Literature. Ed. Christopher Prendergast. London: Verso, 2004. 148-62.
[example 2.13]

Tilly, Charles. "Softcore Solipsism." Labour/Le Travail 34 (1994): 259-68. Rpt. in Stories, Identities, and Political Change. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002. 15-24.
[example 2.14]

Lewis, C. S. "Viewpoints: C. S. Lewis." Twentieth-Century Interpretations of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Ed. Denton Fox. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice, 1968. 100-01. Rpt. of "The Anthropological Approach." English and Medieval Studies Presented to J. R. R. Tolkein on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday. Ed. Norman Davis and C. L. Wrenn. London: Allen, 1962. 219-23.
[example 2.15]

Section 3: Format for Articles (etc.) in Periodicals

Back to Top || Back to Overview

(1) author's name (lastname, firstname); (2) title of article (in quotation marks); (3) title of journal (underlined); (4) volume number (and issue number, if pagination begins anew with each issue); (5) year of publication (in parentheses); (6) page numbers.
[template 3]

Das Gupta, Arun. "Rabindranath Tagore in Indonesia: An Experiment in Bridge-Building." Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 158 (2002): 451-77.
[example 3.0]

Gossman, Lionel. "Literature and Education." New Literary History 13 (1982): 341-71.
[example 3.1]

Vaver, Anthony. "Professionalizing English Studies: From the Eighteenth-Century Social Critic to the Postmodern Literary Theorist." Minnesota Review 43-44 (1995): 228-35.
[example 3.2]

Culler, Jonathan. "Anderson and the Novel." Diacritics 29.4 (1999): 20-39.
[example 3.3]

Gillies, Alexander. "Herder and the Preparation of Goethe's Idea of World Literature." Publications of the English Goethe Society ns 9 (1933): 46-67.
[example 3.4]

Reese, Trevor R. "Georgia in Anglo-Spanish Diplomacy, 1736-1739." William and Mary Quarterly 3rd ser. 15 (1958): 168-90.
[example 3.5]

Bolaño, Roberto. "Gómez Palacio." Trans. Chris Andrews. New Yorker 8-15 Aug. 2005: 78-81.
[example 3.6]

Paul, Annie Murphy. "Self Help: Shattering the Myths." Psychology Today Mar.-Apr. 2001: 60-68.
[example 3.7]

Hennenberger, Melinda. "The Leonardo Cover-Up." New York Times 21 Apr. 2002, late ed., sec. 6: 42+.
[example 3.8]

Alaton, Salem. "So, Did They Live Happily Ever After?" Globe and Mail [Toronto] 27 Dec. 1997: D1+.
[example 3.9]

Hirsch, Marianne. "The Day Time Stopped." Chronicle of Higher Education 25 Jan. 2002: B11-14.
[example 3.10]

Porter, Bernard. "An Awfully Big Colonial Adventure." Rev. of The Oxford History of the British Empire, gen. ed. Wm. Roger Louis. TLS 14 Jan. 2000: 4-5.
[example 3.11]

Rev. of Anthology of Danish Literature, ed. F. J. Billeskov Jansen and P. M. Mitchell. TLS 7 July 1972: 785.
[example 3.12]

Bordewich, Fergus M. Rev. of Once They Moved like the Wind: Cochise, Geronimo, and the Apache Wars, by David Roberts, and Brave Are My People: Indian Heroes Not Forgotten, by Frank Waters. Smithsonian Mar. 1994: 125-31.
[example 3.13]

Collins, Jeffrey. "Watteau and the Fête Galante." Rev. of Watteau et la fête galante. Musée des Beaux-Arts, Valenciennes, 5 March-14 June 2004. Eighteenth-Century Studies 38 (2005): 691-96.
[example 3.14]

Tommasini, Anthony. "A Feminist Look at Sophocles." Rev. of Jocasta, by Ruth Schonthal and Hélène Cixous. Voice and Vision Theater Co. Cornelia Connelly Center for Educ., New York. New York Times 11 June 1998, late ed.: E5.
[example 3.15]

You should consult the MLA Handbook for various other cases, such as how to handle entries for abstracts (from an abstracts journal), letters to the editor, serialized articles, and entire special issues of journals.

Section 4: Format for Online Publications

Back to Top || Back to Overview

There is a vast range of kinds of documents published online; like the MLA Handbook, this guide deals only with the more academic sources available on the internet (via online databases or as independent webpages). Moreover, unlike the MLA Handbook, this guide does not deal with documents from email, online discussion lists, synchronous communications (MUDs and MOOs), CD-ROM, diskette, or magnetic tape. In the examples below, I deal first with online materials that have no counterparts in print publication; then I discuss online materials that were originally published in print.

References to online sources are limited by the lack of standards for online presentation. Information about online publication is often missing, incomplete, or unreliable. Many webpages include inaccurate or conflicting information about date of online publication. Many (or most) online documents lack reference markers (such as paragraph or section numbers), so it is hard to specify a particular passage in the document. Moreover, many online sources (especially those found as webpages rather than as part of online databases) are unstable: they migrate to a new location; they change their content or organization; they go off-line.

(1) author's name (lastname, firstname); (2) title of the document (in quotation marks---but see exceptions for entire websites, online books, home pages); (3) information about print publication (if applicable and available); (4) title of the website (underlined); (5) name of editor (where applicable); (6) version number of document (where available); (7) date of online publication (or the latest update) (where available); (8) name of institution or organization that sponsors the site (often listed at the bottom of a site's homepage) (if not cited earlier); (9) date you accessed the material; (10) URL (in angle brackets)
[template 4]

"English Emblem Book Chronology." The English Emblem Book Project. Penn State University Libraries. August 2, 2005. <http://emblem.libraries.psu.edu/
chrono.htm>
[example 4.0]

Note: The MLA Handbook does not insert the word "Accessed" before the date of access, but relies instead on placement to distinguish between date of online publication (item 7 in the list above) and date of access of material (item 9). The last date on which you accessed the webpage is always included, so if there is only one date listed (as in the example above), it is automatically understood to be the access date. If another date (the date of online publication) is included, it will precede the access date. The MLA style conventions provide guidelines for citing sources (including online sources) in a print document (e.g., an essay you turn in in hardcopy); they do not address format issues for citations in an online document (such as this one), in which you might use hyperlinks instead of providing URLs in the body of the text. See the section on "Further References" below for further discussion.

"Asmara Declaration on African Languages and Literatures." Pennsylvania State University, Office of Outreach. 2001. 5 Aug. 2005. <http://www.outreach.psu.edu/
C&I/AllOdds/declaration.html>.
[example 4.1]

Arab Culture and Civilization. National Institute for Technology and Liberal Education. 2005. 5 Aug. 2005. <http://arabworld.nitle.org/>.
[example 4.2]

Matz, Robert. Home page. 5 Aug. 2005. <http://mason.gmu.edu/~rmatz/>.
[example 4.3]

English Department. Dept. home page. George Mason U. 5 Aug. 2005 <http://cas.gmu.edu/english/>.
[example 4.4]

Jann, Rosemary. English 701: Literary Research. Course home page. Aug. 2005-Dec. 2005. English Dept., George Mason U. 25 Aug. 2005 <http://mason.gmu.edu/~rjann/701SyllF2005.htm>.
[example 4.5]

Behn, Aphra. All the Histories and Novels. London: Printed for R. Wellington, 1699. Schoenberg Center for Electronic Text and Image. University of Pennsylvania Library. 5 Aug. 2005 <http://dewey.library.upenn.edu/sceti/>.
[example 4.6]

Thompson, A. Hamilton. "Writers of the Couplet." The Cambridge History of English Literature. Ed. A. W. Ward and A. R. Waller. Vol. 7. New York: Putnam, 1911. Bartleby.com. 5 Aug. 2005. <http://www.bartleby.com/217/index.html>.
[example 4.7]

Frye, Northrop. "The Responsibilities of the Critic." MLN 91 (1976): 797-813. JSTOR 5 Aug. 2005 <http://www.jstor.org/search>.
[example 4.8]

Krugman, Paul. "Design for Confusion." New York Times 5 Aug. 2005. 5 Aug. 2005. <http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/05/opinion/05krugman.html?>.
[example 4.9]

Section 5: Films and Videos

Back to Top || Back to Overview

In what follows, I use the term "film" to refer to any cinematic text, whether recorded on film or video or digital media. The first part deals with films in theatrical release; the second part with films released on DVD or other similar recorded media; the third part with films and clips available online.

(1) title of film (underlined); (2) name of director; (3) optionally, names of other personnel that you wish to include (such as writer, performers, producer); (4) name of distributor; (5) year of release.
[template 5]

The Scavengers. Dir. Eduardo Coutinho. First Run/Icarus, 1992.
[example 5.0]

Mendes, Sam, dir. American Beauty. DreamWorks SKG, 1999.
[example 5.1]

Mifune, Toshiro, perf. Rashomon. Dir. Akira Kurosawa. Daiei, 1950.
[example 5.2]

Goldman, Bo and Lawrence Hauben, adapt. One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. By Ken Kesey. Dir. Milos Forman. Perf. Jack Nicholson, Louise Fletcher. Fantasy Films, 1975.
[example 5.3]

Montuori, Carlo, cinemat. Ladri di biciclette. Dir. Vittorio De Sica. Screenplay by Cesare Zavattini. Based on the novel by Luigi Bartolini. Produzioni De Sica, 1948.
[example 5.4]

(1) title of film (underlined); (2) name of director; (3) optional names of other personnel; (4) year of original release (if relevant); (5) medium or format of reproduction; (6) distributor of reproduction; (7) year of publication of reproduction.
[template 5a]

Battle of Algiers. Dir. Gillo Pontecorvo. 1966. Video recording. Rhino Home Video, 1993.
[example 5a.1]

Wit. Dir. Mike Nichols. Perf. Emma Thompson. Screenplay by Emma Thompson and Mike Nichols. Based on the play by Margaret Edson. DVD. HBO, 2001.
[example 5a.2]

(1) title (underlined); (2) director; (3) any other contributors you wish to list; (4) year of original release; (5) name of website; (6) date accessed; (7) URL of website or web page.
[template 5b]

Nosferatu. Dir. F. W. Murnau. Screenplay by Henrik Galeen. Based on the novel by Bram Stoker. 1922. Google Video. 23 March 2007. <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6185283610506001721>.
[example 5b.1]

EclecticAsylumArt. "NewNuma.com 11608: Speed Painting with Chocolate." YouTube. 22 March 2007. 23 March 2007. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLMpbQxqi0o>
[example 5b.2]

Section 6: Television and Radio

[under construction]

Section 7: Performances

[under construction]

Section 8: Exhibitions

[under construction]

Section 9: Artworks

[under construction]

Section 10: Unpublished and Oral Sources

[under construction]

Section 11: Arrangement of Items in a Works Cited List

Back to Top

Entries in the works cited list are arranged alphabetically, by the authors' last names. Using the letter-by-letter system, you ignore spaces and punctuation marks in a given last name, and alphabetize strictly in terms of the sequence of letters that make up the name. If two authors have the same last name, alphabetize by their first names. For works that have no author, alphabetize using their title (ignoring, for this purpose, any initial articles in the title [A, An, The]); so, too, for reviews that have neither author nor title, alphabetize by the title of the work being reviewed (ignoring "Rev. of" at the start of the entry for this purpose).

If you have more than one work by the same author(s), alphabetize them by title (ignoring any designations after the author's name, such as "ed." or "trans.," and ignoring any initial articles in the titles of the works). Give the author(s) name(s) in the first entry only; in subsequent entries, replace the name(s) with three hyphens, followed by a period. If the author of a given entry reappears as the first of two or more co-authors of the next entry, repeat the author's name in full (do not replace it with three hyphens). The hyphens replace a complete designation of authorship; they are never used in combination with persons' names in a single entry.

Atkins, G. Douglas.
Atkinson, Albert.
Bacon, Francis.
Bacon, Wallace A.
Bazerman, Charles.
Bazerman, Charles and Paul A. Prior, ed.
Bazerman, Charles and David Russell.
Beattie, James. Elements of Moral Science.
---. Scotticisms, Arranged in Alphabetical Order.
Berlin, James A. "Revisionary History: The Dialectical Method."
---. Writing Instruction in Nineteenth-Century American Colleges.
Berlin, James A. and Michael Vivon, ed.
Cohen, Murray.
The College Examination.
Colley, Linda.
Crowley, Tony. Language and History: Theories and Texts.
---, comp. The Politics of Language in Ireland.
---. Standard English and the Politics of Language.
Defoe, Daniel.
De Gategno, Paul James.
Rev. of Devolving English Literature, by Robert Crawford.
Dickson, Tony.
[example 11.1]

This sample of (incomplete) entries from a works cited list illustrates the alphabetization rules discussed above.

If you have several items from a collection of essays or an anthology, you can avoid unnecessary repetition of bibliographic information by making use of cross-references: include a complete bibliographic entry for collection as a whole, but for individual selections from the collection, give the author, title, and then a cross-reference to the collection (identified by the editor's last name) and page numbers:

Akhtar, Shabbir. "The Case for Religious Fundamentalism." Appignanesi and Maitland 227-31.

Appignanesi, Lisa and Sara Maitland, ed. The Rushdie File. Syracuse: Syracuse UP, 1990.

Basu, Shrabani. "Of Satan, Archangels and Prophets." Appignanesi and Maitland 32-33.

Rushdie, Salman. "An Open Letter to the Indian Prime Minister." Appignanesi and Maitland 34-36.
[example 11.2]

Section 12: In-Text Citations: Overview

Back to Top

A works cited list tells your reader which sources you have used in your own work and gives full bibliographic information for each one, but it does not indicate either where in your paper each source is relevant or what part of each source is relevant. These latter two functions are served by in-text citations. Unlike some footnotes and endnotes, in-text citations do not provide bibliographic information about your sources (since that is provided by the works cited list). Rather, they provide the minimal information necessary to identify (1) the source used at a particular place in your text and (2) the specific passage of that source that is relevant in this regard.

The in-text citation often takes the form of specifying the last name of the author of the source you are using at a particular point in your essay and a page reference for the specific place in that source:

Complaints about the professors' failure to lecture, continuing financial problems, and divisive legal conflicts continued up until 1768, when the college building was sold and lectures were continued on a much smaller scale in a room in the Exchange (Burgon 2: 495).
[example 12.1]

Seeing such an in-text citation (note that the page reference in example 12.1 is to volume 2, page 495 of the work by Burgon), the reader can turn to the works cited list, where he or she will find the following entry:

Burgon, Thomas W. The Life and Times of Sir Thomas Gresham. 2 vols. London: Robert Jennings, 1839.

Variations on this basic pattern for in-text citations---"(lastname page[s])"---occur due to various contextual factors having to do either with the local exposition in your paper or the entries in your works cited list. For instance, if there is more than one item by the named author in the works cited list, you will obviously need to supply some information in the in-text citation to allow your reader to distinguish which source you are referring to.

MLA style guidelines call for the minimun necessary documentation in in-text citations. So, if the local context of discussion in your paper makes clear who the author of the cited work is, you only include a page reference in your parenthetical citation. Very often, the signal phrase introducing a quotation or a paraphrase of a source text indicates something about the authorship of the information:

Gramsci distinguished the domains of civil and political society with the shorthand equation of "state=political society + civil society, in other words hegemony protected by the armor of coercion" (263).
[example 12.2]

Here, since we know the quotation comes from the item in the works cited list authored by Gramsci, the simple page reference in the parenthetical citation is sufficient to locate the passage in question. You will often incorporate some of the information that might appear in your parenthetical citation (author's name, title of work) into your own exposition, in which case that information is not repeated in the parenthetical citation. You should formulate your sentences for maximum readability and elegance and then fill in whatever parenthetical citations are needed for documentation purposes. If you paraphrase information that is corroborated by two or more sources, you can combine them in a single parenthetical citation [12.3].

The Irish were forbidden to export their leading product, wool, to any country but England, and prohibitive tariffs were imposed on its import there (see Lecky 57; Simms 14).
[example 12.3]

Mudrooroo remarked at the beginning of the 1990s,

the Aboriginal writer exists in a state of ambiguity. White people assume that he or she is writing for the white world, the world of the invader. It is a curious fate---to write for a people not one's own, and stranger still to write for the conquerors of one's people. (148; emphasis added)
[example 12.4]

In-text parenthetical citations are placed directly after the use of the source material in your exposition. This means that, most commonly, a parenthetical citation will appear at the end of the sentence making use of the source (before the closing period---except in the case of an indented quotation, when the parenthetical citation comes after the final period [12.4]); parenthetical citations also often appear at the end of a clause or phrase (before a comma). The main consideration is to make as clear as possible just what part of your exposition draws on the cited source; within the room for manoeuvre allowed by that stipulation, the parenthetical citation is placed where it will least disrupt the readability of your sentence. When you have a direct quotation from a source, but the rest of the sentence expresses your own thoughts, the parenthetical citation needs to appear immediately after the closing quotation mark. (If, however, the rest of your sentence, after a direct quotation, is also drawing on the same source, the parenthetical citation belongs at the end of your sentence.) If you underline words in the quoted passage that are not underlined in the source itself, you need to indicate this by putting "emphasis added" in the parenthetical citation [12.4].

In some cases, page numbers are omitted, either because you are citing a work that contains no pagination (as is often the case with online sources, and also with sources such as a film, a performance, a lecture) or because pagination is conventionally omitted in certain cases (e.g., citations of reference works that are arranged alphabetically). In all such cases, you can indicate the source in a signal phrase, and avoid the need for a parenthetical citation altogether, or you can simply list the author's last name (or, an abbreviated title, if need be) in the parenthetical citation.

The important thing to remember is that since MLA style involves a minimalist presentation of documentary information in the body of your text, it is crucial that you make sure that you have actually included enough information to identify unambiguously the specific source passage you are drawing on. It is very easy to create ambiguities if you don't examine carefully the in-text documentation you have have provided---in relation to your local exposition and in relation to the works cited list at the end of your paper.

Some common variations on the standard pattern for in-text citations are discussed in the next section.

Section 13: In-Text Citations: Examples

Back to Top

Citing Two or More Works by the Same Author or by Different Authors with the Same Last Name

If there is more than one item in the works cited list by a given author, when you cite any of the works by this author, you will need to indicate which of these works you are citing. MLA style uses abbreviated title references in the in-text citation to distinguish among multiple works by a given author:

Blair also defended his concentration on "faults, or rather blemishes and imperfections" by noting that one can only read the "best authors" with "pleasure, when one properly distinguishes their beauties from their faults" (Lectures 1: 79). An emphasis on correctness was also needed because of the "peculiarities of dialect" of his Scottish students, whose "ordinary spoken language differs much from what is used by good English authors" (1: 430).
[example 13.1]

Some writers also defended their concentration on "faults, or rather blemishes and imperfections" by noting that one can only read the "best authors" with "pleasure, when one properly distinguishes their beauties from their faults" (Blair, Lectures 1: 79).
[example 13.2]

  • The first parenthetical reference here tells us that the source being used is Hugh Blair's Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles-Lettres, rather than any other work by Blair in the works cited list. You don't need to include the whole title in the parenthetical citation to accomplish this purpose---just a selected portion from the beginning of the title (omitting any articles) that is distinct enough to identify the work in question is sufficient. (If there were two works by Hugh Blair in the works cited list that began with Lectures on . . ., obviously you would need to include some more of either title to distinguish between them.)
  • Note that when the author's name is mentioned in the text, it doesn't appear in the parenthetical citation [13.1]. Otherwise, you need the author's last name, a comma, the short title, and a page reference in the parenthetical citation, to identify which of several works by the same author you are referencing [13.2]
  • In example 13.1, the second parenthetical reference only includes a page number (or, a volume and page number), because it is clear from context that we are still talking about the same source that was identified in the previous parenthetical citation.

If there are two or more authors in your works cited list with the same last name, you need to indicate which author you are drawing on in a signal phrase or in the parenthetical citation itself (by adding the author's first initial): e.g., "(W. Bacon 42)" or "(F. Bacon 42)" (to borrow from example 11.1).

Citing Indirect Sources

Whenever possible, you should get your hands on a relevant source and cite it directly. But, often enough, it is necessary to cite a source indirectly, that is, from someone else's citation of that source. When what you take from a source is itself a quotation from another source, use "qtd. in" (quoted in) at the start of your parenthetical citation to the source you have taken this quotation from:

Pope's Dunciad describes "Printing as a scourge for the Sins of the Learned," with paper "so cheap, and printers so numerous, that a deluge of authors cover'd the land" (qtd. in Kernan 74, 11).
[example 13.3]

The author is quoting from Pope's Dunciad, but he or she found the quotation in the book by Kernan listed below, rather than in Pope's original work. The source being cited is Kernan; the author being quoted is Pope---who is "quoted in" Kernan.

Kernan, Alvin. Printing Technology, Letters, and Samuel Johnson. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1987.

If the name of the author of the source text is mentioned in your sentence, you don't need it in the parenthetical citation, and instead of "qtd. in" you simply use "qtd." (with the relevant page number(s):

Kernan has contrasted the attitudes of Johnson's generation with that of Pope, whose Dunciad describes "Printing as a scourge for the Sins of the Learned," with paper "so cheap, and printers so numerous, that a deluge of authors cover'd the land" (qtd. 74, 11).
[example 13.4]

Citing Verse Plays and Poems

For most works, you will give page numbers to specify the particular passage you are referencing in the text. But with verse plays and poems---at least ones published in editions that indicate line numbers---it is conventional to specify the passage by division number (act, scene, canto, book, part) (if needed) and line number, with a period between the numbers:

For a moment, Hamlet teeters on the brink of a transformation that would turn him into a "Nero" (3.3.340):
'Tis now the very witching time of night,
When churchyards yawn, and hell itself breathes out
Contagion to this world. Now could I drink hot blood,
And do such bitter business as the day
Would quake to look on. (3.3.334-38)
[example 13.5]

This is an example of the complex, yet submerged, passion that Liz Rosenberg calls "the easy brotherly / lust of marriage" (lines 22-23).
[example 13.6a]

Rosenberg, Liz. "Married Love." The Norton Introduction to Literature. Ed. Alison Booth, J. Paul Hunter, and Kelly J. Mays. 9th ed. New York: Norton, 2005. 816-17.
[example 13.6b]

  • In quoting from a verse play, like Hamlet, you provide act, scene, and line numbers (in that order), separated by periods [13.5].
  • In quoting from a poem, from an edition that indicates line numbers---e.g., Liz Rosenberg's "Married Love" in the The Norton Introduction to Literature---you cite using line numbers rather than page numbers (though the entry for this work in your works cited list will still specify the pages on which it is found [13.6b]). Your parenthetical citation will give line numbers preceded by the word "line" or "lines" (rather than the abbreviations "l." or "ll." since these can look like numbers) [13.6a]. After the first citation, subsequent parenthetical references can omit "line(s)" before the line number(s), since it is now clear that references to this particular work are to line numbers, not page numbers. But if there's room for confusion, you should include "line" or "lines" in the parenthetical citation

Citing Sacred Writings; Laws, Acts, Treaties; Sections of Books

Normally, you underline the title of any separately published work and put quotation marks around works included in a volume. But these rules do not apply to certain special cases. You do not underline the names of sacred writings (including all books and versions of the Bible) [13.7]; nor the names of laws, acts, treaties, and other political documents [13.9]; nor do you put quotation marks around references to sections of books [13.10]:

Bible, King James Version, Revised Standard Version, Old Testament, Genesis, Gospels, Psalms, Talmud, Koran, Vedas, Upanishads---but The Interlinear Bible, The Talmud of the Land of Israel: A Preliminary Translation and Explanation, The Upanishads: A Selection for the Modern Reader

During the Enlightenment, it was particularly the depiction of God in the Old Testament that came under critical scrutiny.
[example 13.7]

As the New English Bible notes: some scholars consider Ruth a postexilic literary creation, though perhaps based on an older tale; on this view, it was intended to counteract the harsh decrees of Ezra and Nehemiah against foreign wives (Ezra 10.1-5; Neh. 13.23-27).
[example 13.8]

Magna Carta, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Treaty of Utrecht, Geneva Convention

The famous words of the Declaration of Independence, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal . . ."
[example 13.9]

preface, introduction, works cited list, bibliography, appendix, index, chapter 2, act 4, scene 7, stanza 20, canto 32, book 3

The scope of the author's argument is indicated in the introduction, but it is not until chapter 3 that we get a clear sense of just how far-reaching its implications really are.
[example 13.10]

  • Although in-text references to sacred writings are not underlined [13.7], citations of particular published editions of sacred writings are treated like any other published work, both for in-text citations and in the works cited list [13.8]

Section 14: Further References

Back to Top

Gibaldi, Joseph. MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. 6th ed. New York: MLA, 2003. (Third printing, April 2005.)
[The "style bible" that serves as the basis for my own guide to MLA documentation style.]

"Frequently Asked Questions about MLA Style." 10 July 2003. Modern Language Association of America. 4 Aug. 2005. <http://www.mla.org/publications/style/style_faq/style_faq>.
[The MLA's own webpage for FAQs about MLA style.]

Walker, Janice R. and Todd Taylor. The Columbia Guide to Online Style. New York: Columbia UP, 1998.
[Provides guidelines not only for citation of online documents, but also for formatting citations in online documents, the latter being an issue not addressed by the MLA Handbook.]

Kasdorf, William E., ed. The Columbia Guide to Digital Publishing. New York: Columbia UP, 2003. Also available online (by subscription) <http://digitalpublishingguide.com>
[Discusses electronic document processing and delivery issues, again, a terrain not taken up fully by the MLA Handbook.]

Alexander, Patrick H., et al., ed. The SBL Handbook of Style: For Ancient Near Eastern, Biblical, and Early Christian Studies. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1999.
[A specialized style guide for those dealing extensively with Biblical and early Christian materials. Not, of course, the same as MLA style.]

Roberts, Deborah. "A Guide to Citing Sources in Classics." 5 July 2006. Classics Department, Haverford College. 11 July 2006. <http://www.haverford.edu/classics/courses/omni/citations.html>
[Especially helpful for its discussion of standard formats for citing primary (ancient) texts in classical scholarship. Again, not the same as MLA style, but useful to understand if you find yourself reading secondary scholarship published by classicists.]

The Blue Book: A Uniform System of Citation. 18th ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law Review Association, et al., 2005.
[Recommended in the MLA Handbook as an essential guide, if you need to cite lots of legal materials.]

Martin, Peter W. Introduction to Basic Legal Citation. January 2006. Legal Information Institute, Cornell University Law School. 12 July 2006. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/citation/>
[An excellent online source for information about citation of legal materials.]

Valid XHTML 1.0!